Who is Barack Obama? - A Terrifying Analysis - Israel Commentary

Who is Barack Obama? - A Terrifying Analysis

Please watch all of the video clips below, and the story below that. Once you've done that, spread the word!

Redacted from a speech by Dinesh D'Souza, President King's College, NYC, NY and author of The Roots of Obama's Rage
By Jerome S. Kaufman

On March 15, 2011, the Heritage Foundation sponsored a telecast featuring Dinesh D'Souza, President of King's College New York and author of the best selling book, Roots of Obama's Rage. After introducing himself, D'Souza got right into an in-depth analysis of current US President Barack Obama. Obama is the product of an unusual family history, far different from most Americans or people anywhere, for that matter. To say Obama is the product of his parentage and previous environment is a gross understatement.

D'Souza first described his own difficulty understanding Obama. Who did Obama represent, what were his ambitions, his goals, his mind set, etc.? D'Souza concluded that Obama was a different leader from previous Democrats - especially different from so-called liberals like Jimmy Carter, Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton.

There are a host of theories trying to explain Obama. By the Right he has many different designations - a Progressive, a conventional Liberal, a Socialist, a Muslim, not born an American, an alien. But, all of these javelins bounce off Obama with no effect or just glancing blows. He continues to act in apparently mysterious ways - not easily explained. If he were truly a Socialist he would have tried to command the means of production. But, Obama did not nationalize banks but rather infused capital to them. Another inconsistency: Recently banks wanted to pay back their government loan and get off the hook with the Obama administration. But, Obama did not want to take their money. Rather he insisted that the bank undergo some sort of stress test before allowing them off the hook? Why?

There are claims that he is an environmentalist and simply acting out that role - banning vital oil drilling in America, limiting the production of coal, introducing and pouring billions into hair brain solutions like wind mills and sun energy which are far more expensive and will not supply anywhere near the energy required besides, requiring years to develop properly.

Others say he has been motivated by Al Gore's global warming theory. Gore asks for the use of less energy and a smaller carbon footprint to solve this debatable problem. However, Gore wants everyone in the world to cut back, not just the US. Obama does not care who conforms or not. Faster growing economies like China and India, far more responsible for future theoretical global warming, are ignored. Obama's thinking is thus, not that of a true environmentalist.

In addition, Obama is blocking oil drilling all over America and its coastline while, at the same time, encouraging oil drilling in Mexico. To add salt to our wounds, The US Export Import bank has given a two billion dollar loan guarantee to Brazil to do their own off shore drilling. But, the oil is not to go to us but to the Chinese!

Then, there is his inconsistent and apparently illogical approach to all our problems in the Middle East - one minute he is siding with the dictators of Egypt, Libya, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the next minute, making obligatory gestures of compassion to their long suffering populations. (Not to mention his dissing and enthusiastic participation in the dismantling of our only reliable ally in the Middle East, Israel jsk)

Other inane gestures: He somehow made the Muslims party to our space program praising them for their great contributions to its development - huh? He returned a bust of Winston Churchill given to us by the Brits that had been gratefully placed by us in the White House because of Churchill's crucial contribution to the defeat of Adolph Hitler in WWII.

D'Souza ended up concluding it was difficult accounting for all of Obama's apparent weirdness until D'Souza came to his own epiphany that Obama is not weird, foolish, inexperienced naive or any of the above. He knows exactly what he is doing and we had better stop misinterpreting and underestimating the man.

D'Sousa presented his conclusion combining these disparate facts in one impossible to refute hypothesis which negates all the previous theories we might have had. Obama is not Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton or just another American Black shake down artist. Obama has not really been raised American. His early years were in Kenya and then Indonesia. He was first thrust into American culture by his mother when he was already 10-12 years old.

Then, D'Sousa read Obama's book, Dreams from my Father. D'Sousa discovered that indeed, Obama has nothing to do with Black America. He never sat at a segregated lunch counter nor was he descended from slaves. His Dad was an educated immigrant from Kenya and his Mom was white from Kansas. His is not an American dream. He has no understanding or sympathy for American exceptionalism. In fact, he resents the concept.

So, what is Obama's dream? He tells us very explicitly that his dream is his father's dream. Obama Sr. was raised in Kenya. In his 20`s, he married a Black woman in Kezia, had two children by her, and while she was pregnant with the second, he left his family and went to Hawaii as a student. He there met Obama's Mom - Stanley Ann, married her and before Obama Jr. was age two also left her. He then went to Harvard where he took up with a third woman, took her back to Africa and had two children by her. At the same time he reunited with his first wife, from Kezia, and had two more children with her. In total he had four wives, usually two at the same time, and 8 children and with no sense of obligation and nor did he supply care for any of them.

Obama Sr. was a chronic alcoholic who had multiple driving accidents. He kills a man in one, in another hurts himself so badly his two legs have to be cut off and replaced with iron rods. Nevertheless, his courtship style remains intact. He takes up with another woman who bears his eighth child, George Obama.

In summary - he was quite an unusual role model for President Obama! Later, Obama Jr's sister took him to task and demanded how could he admire this despicable man who had abandoned all his wives and children, never gave them a dime or even paid them a visit. Obama Jr., in fact, barely knew him since his Dad had visited him only once, when he was about 10 years old. Consequently, Sr. had no direct influence upon Jr.

That influence was wielded by Obama Sr.'s first convert - Jr's mother, Stanley Ann Obama. Obama's mother was an only child. She grew up in Kansas and somehow became a bohemian rebel against her parents and her country. Despite her marriage and rapid abandonment by Obama's father, she refused to learn from her experience. She finds and marries another third world, anti-American guy, Lolo Satora, He was Indonesian and grew up under the colonial Dutch. Satora wooed Stanley Ann Obama with stories of Indonesian colonialism, married her and took her and her son, Jr. to live in Indonesia.

By a quirk of fate and bad luck for the American people, the Indonesian husband becomes more pro Western, pro American, and anti Communist. He signs up with an oil company and fights against Indonesian rebels in his own countryside. Ann then attacks him as a traitor to the greater cause and quickly sends Jr. back to Kansas to be raised by her parents and escape the pro-American thinking of the Indonesian husband. She remains in Indonesia the rest of her life.

Obama's father, Obama Sr.. was basically an anti-Colonialist - the dominant idea in the third world of the 20th Century. The simple core of this idea was that the world is divided into two - the colonizers or oppressors and the colonized or victims. The colonizers used to be Europe, Britain, France and now it is America in this line of thought. Furthermore, the rich got rich only by looting the colonized and even when they left, powerful economic forces remained in a position of exploitation. Banks, insurance and pharmaceutical companies, oil companies and anyone else that happens to make money are simply now the economic wing of colonialism still into exploitation. And, who to Barack Obama, Jr. is the lead elephant and current exploiter? Why we are, of course.
How is Obama to deal with us, the problem? First, bring us under the rod of the Federal government. Obama's father in 1965 wrote an article in an East African journal saying how this should be done. Bring down all the rich guys by the power of the state, confiscate their land, property, raise taxes as high as you want - 100% if necessary, and obtain their wealth through fiat and legislative piracy. The rationale is that the wealth is not rightfully theirs, in the first place, but had been ripped off from the poor.

That is Dinesh D'Souza's basic hypothesis. So, Obama far from being a multi-culture guy, far from being the first African American president, is actually the first anti-American, anti-colonialism president and driven by that mind-set!

Obama, like the naive would like to believe, is no buffoon, not inexperienced, not unworldly, not apolitical and not a mediocrity. He is a very clever but misdirected guy and out to do us all in. He is the most effective Democratic President since Lyndon Johnson. He has gotten more programs passed in the shortest time, by Democrat or Republican, since Reagan.

If he is to be voted out of office in 2012, Republicans will have to take the full measure of the man. They need a strong guy, perhaps a father figure, a person that appeals to the American public. It will be a very difficult election made more so by mindless, irresponsible media genuflections and the Obama useful idiots that may never see the awful danger that this man represents.

Jerome S. Kaufman, Editor
www.israel-commentary.org

Video:  2010.04.06 - FNC - Glenn Beck - Barack Obama Socialist - Obama's Political Upbringing (1of 2)

Video:  2010.04.06 - FNC - Glenn Beck - Barack Obama Socialist - Obama's Political Upbringing (2of 2)

Video:  '>2010.04.06 - FNC - Glenn Beck - Socialist in the White House (Barack Obama's Socialist Policies)

The rest of the Glenn Beck video pertaining to this subject (two more video clips) will be made available on Friday, April first, 2011.

Bombshell Report:  Barack Obama Conclusively Outed as CIA Creation

Obama, the African Colonial

By L.E. Ikenga  -  June 25, 2009

Had Americans been able to stop obsessing over the color of Barack Obama's skin and instead paid more attention to his cultural identity, maybe he would not be in the White House today. The key to understanding him lies with his identification with his father, and his adoption of a cultural and political mindset rooted in postcolonial Africa.

Like many educated intellectuals in postcolonial Africa, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was enraged at the transformation of his native land by its colonial conqueror. But instead of embracing the traditional values of his own tribal cultural past, he embraced an imported Western ideology, Marxism. I call such frustrated and angry modern Africans who embrace various foreign "isms", instead of looking homeward for repair of societies that are broken, African Colonials. They are Africans who serve foreign ideas.

The tropes of America's racial history as a way of understanding all things black are useless in understanding the man who got his dreams from his father, a Kenyan exemplar of the African Colonial.

Before I continue, I need to say this: I am a first generation born West African-American woman whose parents emigrated to the U.S. in the 1970's from the country now called Nigeria. I travel to Nigeria frequently. I see myself as both a proud American and as a proud Igbo (the tribe that we come from -- also sometimes spelled Ibo). Politically, I have always been conservative (though it took this past election for me to commit to this once and for all!); my conservative values come from my Igbo heritage and my place of birth. Of course, none of this qualifies me to say what I am about to -- but at the same time it does.

My friends, despite what CNN and the rest are telling you, Barack Obama is nothing more than an old school African Colonial who is on his way to turning this country into one of the developing nations that you learn about on the National Geographic Channel. Many conservative (East, West, South, North) African-Americans like myself -- those of us who know our history -- have seen this movie before. Here are two main reasons why many Americans allowed Obama to slip through the cracks despite all of his glaring inconsistencies:

First, Obama has been living on American soil for most of his adult life. Therefore, he has been able to masquerade as one who understands and believes in American democratic ideals. But he does not. Barack Obama is intrinsically undemocratic and as his presidency plays out, this will become more obvious. Second, and most importantly, too many Americans know very little about Africa. The one-size-fits-all understanding that many Americans (both black and white) continue to have of Africa might end up bringing dire consequences for this country.

Contrary to the way it continues to be portrayed in mainstream Western culture, Africa is not a continent that can be solely defined by AIDS, ethnic rivalries, poverty and safaris. Africa, like any other continent, has an immense history defined by much diversity and complexity. Africa's long-standing relationship with Europe speaks especially to some of these complexities -- particularly the relationship that has existed between the two continents over the past two centuries. Europe's complete colonization of Africa during the nineteenth century, also known as the Scramble for Africa, produced many unfortunate consequences, the African colonial being one of them.

The African colonial (AC) is a person who by means of their birth or lineage has a direct connection with Africa. However, unlike Africans like me, their worldviews have been largely shaped not by the indigenous beliefs of a specific African tribe but by the ideals of the European imperialism that overwhelmed and dominated Africa during the colonial period. AC's have no real regard for their specific African traditions or histories.  AC's use aspects of their African culture as one would use pieces of costume jewelry: things of little or no value that can be thoughtlessly discarded when they become a negative distraction, or used on a whim to decorate oneself in order to seem exotic. (Hint: Obama's Muslim heritage).

On the other hand, AC's strive to be the best at the culture that they inherited from Europe. Throughout the West, they are tops in their professions as lawyers, doctors, engineers, Ivy League professors and business moguls; this is all well and good. It's when they decide to engage us as politicians that things become messy and convoluted.

The African colonial politician (ACP) feigns repulsion towards the hegemonic paradigms of Western civilization. But at the same time, he is completely enamored of the trappings of its aristocracy or elite culture. The ACP blames and caricatures whitey to no end for all that has gone wrong in the world. He convinces the masses that various forms of African socialism are the best way for redressing the problems that European colonialism motivated in Africa. However, as opposed to really being a hard-core African Leftist who actually believes in something, the ACP uses socialist themes as a way to disguise his true ambitions: a complete power grab whereby the "will of the people" becomes completely irrelevant.

Barack Obama is all of the above. The only difference is that he is here playing (colonial) African politics as usual. 

In his 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father -- an eloquent piece of political propaganda -- Obama styles himself as a misunderstood intellectual who is deeply affected by the sufferings of black people, especially in America and Africa. In the book, Obama clearly sees himself as an African, not as a black American. And to prove this, he goes on a quest to understand his Kenyan roots. He is extremely thoughtful of his deceased father's legacy; this provides the main clue for understanding Barack Obama.

Barack Obama Sr. was an African colonial to the core; in his case, the apple did not fall far from the tree. All of the telltale signs of Obama's African colonialist attitudes are on full display in the book -- from his feigned antipathy towards Europeans to his view of African tribal associations as distracting elements that get in the way of "progress".  (On p. 308 of Dreams From My Father, Obama says that African tribes should be viewed as an "ancient loyalties".)

Like imperialists of Old World Europe, the ACP sees their constituents not as free thinking individuals who best know how to go about achieving and creating their own means for success. Instead, the ACP sees his constituents as a flock of ignorant sheep that need to be led -- oftentimes to their own slaughter.

Like the European imperialist who spawned him, the ACP is a destroyer of all forms of democracy.

Here are a few examples of what the British did in order to create (in 1914) what is now called Nigeria and what Obama is doing to you:

1. Convince the people that "clinging" to any aspect of their cultural (tribal) identity or history is bad and regresses the process of "unity". British Imperialists deeply feared people who were loyal to anything other than the state. "Tribalism" made the imperialists have to work harder to get people to just fall in line. Imperialists pitted tribes against each other in order to createchaos that they then blamed on ethnic rivalry. Today many "educated" Nigerians, having believed that their traditions were irrelevant, remain completely ignorant of their ancestry and the history of their own tribes.
2. Confiscate the wealth and resources of the area that you govern by any means necessary in order to redistribute wealth. The British used this tactic to present themselves as empathetic and benevolent leaders who wanted everyone to have a "fair shake". Imperialists are not interested in equality for all. They are interested in controlling all. 
3. Convince the masses that your upper-crust university education naturally puts you on an intellectual plane from which to understand everything even when you understand nothing.Imperialists were able to convince the people that their elite university educations allowed them to understand what Africa needed. Many of today's Nigerians-having followed that lead-hold all sorts of degrees and certificates-but what good are they if you can't find a job? 
4. Lie to the people and tell them that progress is being made even though things are clearly becoming worse. One thing that the British forgot to mention to their Nigerian constituents was that one day, the resources that were being used to engineer "progress" (which the British had confiscated from the Africans to begin with!) would eventually run out. After WWII, Western Europe could no longer afford to hold on to their African colonies. So all of the counterfeit countries that the Europeans created were then left high-and-dry to fend for themselves. This was the main reason behind the African independence movements of the1950 and 60's. What will a post-Obama America look like?
5. Use every available media outlet to perpetuate the belief that you and your followers are the enlightened ones-and that those who refuse to support you are just barbaric, uncivilized, ignorant curmudgeons. This speaks for itself.

America, don't be fooled. The Igbos were once made up of a confederacy of clans that ascribed to various forms of democratic government. They took their eyes off the ball and before they knew it, the British were upon them. Also, understand this: the African colonial who is given too much political power can only become one thing: a despot.

L.E. Ikenga can be reached at leikenga@gmail.com.

A must read if you haven’t to understand Barack H. Obama Jr.:  The Roots of Obama's Rage

What America has Become Folks! Can't Even stand on your Property or keep a basketball hoop

What America has Become Folks! Can't Even stand on your Property or keep a basketball hoop

Video:  What America Has Become Folks!

Today it is a basketball hoop of a flag pole.  Tomorrow it will be your organic garden or your guns!!

Stand-up America while you still can!!

Remember the Girl Scouts who were stopped from selling their cookies, the children’s whose lemonade stand that was shut down, the Veteran (more than one) who had to take down his flag pole and stop flying the American flag he fought for, and the man in Austria who was yodeling while mowing his lawn and was charged with making fun of his Muslim neighbor?!?

"To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men." Abraham Lincoln

Let us all remember (for this is how it starts):

FIRST THEY CAME...

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

Then they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
I did not protest;
I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics,
I did not protest;
I was a Protestant.

Then they came for the Jews,
I did not speak out;
I was not a Jew.

When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.

If you think your world isn’t changing America and it doesn’t affect you… just in the news  today:

Ohio Town Removes ‘Easter’ From Egg Hunt

6th Grade NYC Boy Charged With Hate Crime for Trying to Rip Off Girl’s Hijab

Boy Suspended for Bringing Bible to School… Files Suit  -  Good for him and his parents!

And if those in power have their way and International Laws like Shariah take hold in America:

Muslim Girl 14. Lashed to Death for Alleged Adultery  -  And she was innocent

"To stand in silence when they should be protesting makes cowards out of men." Abraham Lincoln

Wake-up America… Is this really the country you want to live in?

Inactive Reserves being called up

Obama was already discharged - now in active reserve - organizing inactive reserve units in every branch [ of service].

"They are getting ready for something"

PLEASE REUPLOAD AND SPREAD!! I WILL NOT Support an Illegal War or Murder! [www.keepvid.com].mp4

Video:  PLEASE REUPLOAD AND SPREAD!! I WILL NOT Support an Illegal War or Murder!

I already heard days ago from a friend with a son in the Marines that U.S. Marine boots were already on the ground in Libya.

Related?:

REPORT: OBAMA AUTHORIZES SECRET SUPPORT FOR LIBYAN REBELS

U.S. Dilemma:  Either Arm Jihadist – Infiltrated Libyan Rebels or Let Gadhafi Prevail

Arab League Condemns No-Fly Zone They Called For

Video – Part 2 of 5 – March 29th, 2011 Show  Did Someone Tell Obama That There Is No “I” in Team of Committee?  -  Obama Now Waffling on Commitment to Turn Over Control to NATO

Not Even Jon Stewart Buys Obama’s NATO Argument

Bachmann Doesn’t Rule Out Ground Forces: “This is President Obama’s War’

Leftist Progressive Senator Dennis Kucinich Raises Question of whether President Obama's war on Libya is an impeachable offense

Did Obama Call the Libyan Situation a ‘Turd Sandwich?’ (NBC Anchor Says “YES’) 

‘BULLSH** FROM ROLLING STONE’: JOURNALIST ATTACKS MAGAZINE‘S ’KILL TEAM’ STORY

Forming to the Left:  A Challenge to Obama

Video:  Total Collapse – The Build-Up to World War III

New Book in May: by a Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard with 2 Years Research. "Where' s the Birth Certificate?"

Video:  Corsi 30 HD (Corsi's Truth).mov

Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President  -  Order today! Title will be released on May 17, 2011

And Checkout:  The Donald… Donald Trump: Obama presidency possibly illegal and…

And read:  Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Loves, and Letters of America's First Postmodern President and Revolt! 

Video:  Donald Trump on Fox: Obama's Presidency May Be Illegal - 3/28/2011

Trump Ties Again – The Donald Releases ‘Official’ Birth Certificate

Are We On the Wrong Side… of History??

So much is going on in the world today that just doesn’t make sense. Has the world turned upside-down or are we on the wrong side of history?? 

Video:  POWERFUL VIDEO: I Stand with Israel! Glenn Beck says  the Administration on Wrong Side (excerpt from 03.29.11 Show)

 

Video:  Coming to a City Near You Sooner than You Think. Muslim STREET CLOG!  Streets in UK Filled with Muslims Demanding Sharia Law

So much is going on in the world today that just doesn’t make sense. Has the world turned upside-down or are we on the wrong side of history?? 

Video:  Things Just Don’t Make Sense

 

Obama aide credits the Prez for Libyans' uprising:
Samantha Power, a former news reporter and White House aide (and wife of Cass Sunstein), has said that Obama's speeches on human rights over the last two years have sparked the uprisings in Libya and throughout the Middle East. Read the full story HERE. 

It is looking more and more that as bad a Gadhafi is, we may again be backing the wrong side… the rebels  supported by Al-Qaeda and that we are involved for all the wrong reasons but still being the main player, yet we will be turning over our decision making power to a committee.

Cass Sunstein's wife 'has Obama's ear'
The NYT ran a feature article on Cass Sunstein's wife ('Still Crusading, but Now on the Inside') that explains how this former activist is now part of the President's inner circle when it comes to foreign policy. She's allegedly the voice who pushed the President into 'kinetic military action' with Libya. Glenn explains why the most dangerous man in America's wife is…well, dangerous. Get the details from radio today

Video – Part 1 of 5 – March 29th, 2011 Show  Who is America Standing With… Who Are You Standing With?

Video – Part 2 of 5 – March 29th, 2011 Show  Did Someone Tell Obama That There Is No “I” in Team of Committee?

Video – Part 3 of 5 – March 29th, 2011 Show – The 12th Imam (Iran’s Teachings)… Hope Faith and Charity, Not Hatred

‘The Coming Is Near’:  New Eerie Iran Propaganda Video – Trumpets Imminent Return of the 12th Imam

Video – Part 4 of 5 – March 29th, 2011 Show  Our Financial Debt and the Japanese Financial Tsunami

Japan Says Quake Rebuild to Cost as Much as $309 Billion

DOH! Extreme Leftist Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) Reveals Democrat Strategy for Budget Bill and Rubio (R-FL) on Not Raising the Debt Ceiling

Stephen Lerner doubles down: this is our moment!
No one in the press feels the need to question Lerner on his economic terrorism plot against the United States, but they sure are happy to let him spew his anti-American propaganda in fabulous op-ed columns! Is Lerner backing off his desire to crash the U.S. stock market and in turn the economy? Or is he doubling down? One guess what this radical union thug is doing...find out HERE

Video – Part 5 of 5 – March 29th, 2011 Show  WSJ: Suggestions for Fixing the Financial Crisis

Stephen Lerner Doubles Down on ‘Economic Terrorism’ Plain in New WSJ Op-Ed

Its a Soros NWO and he wants to put America in its place!

ECONOMIC DISORDER

It's a Soros World Order
'Bretton Woods Conference' designed to create global economy

Billionaire investor George Soros has stepped up his funding of direct efforts to establish a global new world order, seeking to reorganize the world economy to reduce the importance of the U.S. economy.

On April 8, Soros is funding what is shaping up to be an international conference aimed at repeating the famed 1944 Bretton Woods conference that helped create the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund at the end of World War II, according to a report by the Media Research Center, or MRC.

This time, Soros is spending $50 million to rally 200 academic, business and government policy leaders to explore "establishing new international rules" and "reform the currency system."

What Soros wants to accomplish is to move along the globalist agenda of replacing the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency, with the goal of diminishing the ability of the United States to set the terms for the global economy.

The Institute for New Economic Thinking, or INET, a New York City-based Soros-funded group, is hosting the conference scheduled for April 8-11, 2011, at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, N. H., the site of the original conference that set the post-World War II global financial structure until now.

The MRC report noted the speakers scheduled at the INET event leave no doubt about Soros' purpose:

Paul Volker, chairman of President Obama's Economic Advisory Board: MRC notes Volker wrote the forward to Soros' best-known book, "The Alchemy of Finance," and praised Soros as "an enormously successful speculator" who wrote "with insight and passion" about the problems of globalization.

Jeffrey Sachs, director of The Earth Institute and a long-time recipient of Soros grants: According to MRC, Sachs received $50 million for the U.N. Millennium Project, which he also directs. In 2009, Sachs, a noted leftist, complained about low U.S. taxes, saying the "U.S. will have to raise taxes in order to pay for new spending initiatives, especially in the areas of sustainable energy, climate change, education, and relief for the poor."

Soros' friend, Joseph E. Stiglitz, a former senior vice president and chief economist for the World Bank and Nobel Prize winner in economics: MRC noted Stiglitz shares similar views to Soros and has criticized free-market economists, whom he calls "free-market fundamentalists."

INET Executive Director Rob Johnson, a former managing director at Soros Fund Management who is on the board of directors for the Soros-funded Economic Policy Institute: MRC observed that Johnson has complained that government intervention in the fiscal crisis hasn't been enough and wanted "restructuring," including asking "for letters of resignation from the top executives of all the major banks.

"Have no doubt about it: This is a Soros event from top to bottom," MRC concluded.

"The Soros empire is silent about this new Bretton Woods conference because it isn't just designed to change global economic rules," MRC wrote. "It also is designed to put American in its place - part of a multilateral world the way Soros wants it."

Soros, a post-American globalist

In his many books, billionaire hedge-fund manager George Soros has made clear he views economic globalism as an accomplished fact.

Financial markets became "truly global in the early 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union," Soros wrote in his book "On Globalization."

Yet, Soros warns, "While markets have become global, politics remain firmly rooted in the sovereignty of the state."

He is up-front that the formation of international institutions of governance has lagged behind the development of global markets: "The development of international institutions has not kept pace with the growth of global financial markets.

Private capital movements far outweigh the facilities of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank."

Soros has offered many different proposals for overhauling the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization.

Yet, always his conclusion is the same: Global financial markets require international regulation from a new generation of world governance organizations capable of imposing global political control over global economics.

That Soros derives his perspective from globalism is indisputable. "Globalism has made the world increasingly interdependent," he insists.

And again, "Although it would be utopian to replace the people's sovereignty with something else, that principle, on its own, is inadequate for today's increasingly interdependent world."

Keeping with the theme, Soros characterizes himself as a "stateless statesman."

Much of Soros' intellectual framework is based his education at the London School of Economics, where he was deeply influenced by philosopher Karl Popper's call for an "Open Society."

While Popper refused to give his call for an Open Society a precise definition, Popper railed against ideologies that proclaimed a person could only become free by becoming a true believer.

Popper identified Hitler's Nazism and Stalin's communism as enemies of the Open Society.

The Open Society is best understood as a type of intellectual and political freedom in which all ideas are constantly able to be challenged, based on the premise that there is no "political truth" as such, only a value relativism in which all ideas must be subject to constant challenge.

In a revealing passage, Soros identifies his antipathy to George W. Bush in terms fashioned from Popper's Open Society philosophy: "When I heard President Bush say, 'Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists,' I was reminded of Nazi propaganda."

Fundamentally, Soros criticized the "Bush agenda" as being "nationalistic," too focused on pursuing narrowly defined U.S. nation-state interests.

Soros was particularly vituperative toward Vice President Cheney whom he demonized as "the power behind the throne," and characterized as working with Defense Secretary Rumsfeld as having largely succeeded "in imposing their views on Bush."

Asking how he came to have a position of influence on world affairs, Soros honestly admitted, "I have made a lot of money."

---

FUEL PRICE SPIKE
Gas surges to $3.50 a gallon
Still, U.S. refuses to pressure OPEC, oil giants to increase supply

As average gasoline prices in the United States topped $3.50/gallon last week, according to Energy Information Administration estimates, President Obama was encouraging offshore drilling - in Brazil.

Still, while the liberals in Congress, including Obama, pounded President George W. Bush when gasoline prices spiked, Obama is getting a pass from the mainstream media.

The truth is that the U.S. government, under both Bush and Obama, has largely been responsible for keeping energy prices high, not just by a refusal to develop U.S. domestic oil and natural gas reserves, but by our cooperation with OPEC and the major oil companies in what amounts to international collusion to restrict the supply of oil and keep the price high.

The conundrum is this: Why, with a continuing worldwide economic downturn and the damage done to the Japanese economy by the earthquake and tsunami, are oil prices continuing to spike?

The answer lies in realizing high oil prices remain good business for oil producers, especially when the United States stands by watching, as if helpless to do anything to impact world oil supplies.

We are OPEC

Since the 1973 OPE oil embargo, Americans have largely perceived OPEC as being controlled by oil producers outside the power of the United States.

Still, since the initiation of the Iraq war in 2003 and the fall of Saddam Hussein, the United States has quietly assumed a seat at the OPEC table, through our occupation of Iraq and our control of Iraqi governmental processes.

Until OPEC adopted a $22-$28 per barrel price band for the OPEC basket of crude, oil prices only exceeded $28/barrel during times of war or conflict in the Middle East.

When OPEC abandoned its price band in 2005, oil began to surge.

Iraq currently produces about 2.5 million barrels of oil a day, 2 million of which are exported, a level of production close to that before the U.S.-led war deposed Saddam in 2003, but somewhat less that Iraqi production of oil before the Gulf War in 1991, according to CNN.

Instead of increasing Iraqi oil production for the benefit of the United States, the Obama administration has stood by idly, permitting China in August 2008 to sign a contract with the China National Petroleum Corporation, allowing China to develop a vast oil field in southern Iraq's Wasit province for the next 20 years.

Meanwhile, the Iraqi Oil Ministry has continued to negotiate short-term, no-bid contracts with U.S. and EU oil companies, including Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Total SA, Chevron and BP.

Even as the world demand for oil has tapered in conjunction with the reduced economic activity since 2006, in the worst global economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s, oil has traded at or above $40/barrel, surging recently to more than $100/barrel with the political turmoil sweeping the Middle East and the civil war in Libya.

Still, since 2003 no congressional committee has demanded an investigation into why U.S. government officials from Washington to Baghdad have failed to insist upon a return to the OPEC price band that would hold the price of oil to the traditionally accepted price of oil at somewhere between $22-$28/barrel.

The high oil prices fly in the face of the worst recession since the Great Depression.

Global demand for oil, especially as we teeter on the second dip of a double-dip worldwide recession, should bring about falling prices in a truly free market.

Civil war in Libya is good for business

When U.S. sanctions on Libya were lifted in 2005, Occidental Petroleum was the first American company to resume operations there.

Today, Occidental Production in Libya remains constant at about 13,000 barrels a day, about 2 percent of Occidental's company-wide production, despite the onset of the civil war, Fox Business reported.

Last week, the U.S. Treasury banned U.S. companies from dealing with 14 entities controlled by Libya's National Oil Company, or NOC; the EU almost immediately followed suit with its own sanctions on oil companies owned by the Libyan government, the Wall Street Journal reported.

OPEC cut oil shipments to the lowest level since October, with shipments falling to 23 million barrels a day, down 1.8 percent from 23.46 million in the period to March 12, according to Bloomberg.

"It's a precipitous drop," Oil Movements founder Roy Manson told Bloomberg. "Market tightness will get worse through the spring as refiners are coming out of maintenance now and their capacity is up."

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has pledged to replace lost Libyan output.

Exactly how much the civil war in Libya will push oil prices up depends in large part on how long the conflict lasts.

Still, even with Saudi Arabia increasing output, the Libyan conflict provides a convenient excuse for OPEC to restrict supply, allowing market forces to spike the price of oil, despite the continuing worldwide recession and the disruption to economic activity caused by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

Red Alert wants to thank Carl Olson for suggesting this article.

Ayers & Dohrn fantasize about one world government (video)
This tender, loving, radical couple has been revolting for decades now. For a guy who allegedly has no connection to the President whatsoever, he seems to be a highly sought after speaker. The former domestic terrorists took questions and lovingly wax poetic about the possibility of a one world government system. Those crazy kids will never stop the craziness! STORY

Wade Radke’s startling Admission:  ‘Economic Terrorism’ Engineer Stephen Lerner is still on SEIU Payroll

DOH! Extreme Leftist Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) Reveals Democrat Strategy For Budget Bill & Rubio (R-FL) on Not Raising Debt Ceiling

Posted by Jared Law on March 29, 2011 at 10:01pm in Elections, Issues, News, & Politics

• Send Message View Discussions

This is rich, especially coming from such an extreme, radical leftist like Chuck Schumer. Talk about the soot-encrusted pot calling the gleaming, polished-stainless steel kettle (with a solid copper bottom) black!

The fact of the matter is that the Democrats in 'leadership' positions in the U.S. Senate are hardcore, radical leftists. Many who call themselves Communists are just as far left, as Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid, Frank Lautenberg, and other 'Progressives' in the Democrat party.

It's nice to see what we all know is happening, exposed to the light of day. Those dirty, radical leftists can't hide their scheming to combine against the liberty of the American People forever; thankfully, we have examples to show potential recruits to our cause. Cold, hard evidence which cannot be explained away by the honest and honorable.
--------

On a Senate Call, a Glimpse of Marching Orders

By JENNIFER STEINHAUER | March 29, 2011, 12:30 PM 4:58 p.m. | Updated: Um, senators, ever heard of the mute button?

Moments before a conference call with reporters was scheduled to get underway on Tuesday morning, Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, apparently unaware that many of the reporters were already on the line, began to instruct his fellow senators on how to talk to reporters about the contentious budget process.

After thanking his colleagues — Barbara Boxer of California, Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, Thomas R. Carper of Delaware and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut — for doing the budget bidding for the Senate Democrats, who are facing off against the House Republicans over how to cut spending for the rest of the fiscal year, Mr. Schumer told them to portray John A. Boehner of Ohio, the speaker of the House, as painted into a box by the Tea Party, and to decry the spending cuts that he wants as extreme. “I always use the word extreme,” Mr. Schumer said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.”

A minute or two into the talking-points tutorial, though, someone apparently figured out that reporters were listening, and silence fell.

Then the conference call began in earnest, with the Democrats right on message.

“We are urging Mr. Boehner to abandon the extreme right wing,” said Ms. Boxer, urging the House to compromise on the scale of spending cuts and to drop proposed amendments that would deny federal financing for Planned Parenthood and for government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency.

Mr. Carper continued with the theme, referring to some House Republicans’ “right-wing extremist friends.” Mr. Cardin decried Mr. Boehner’s giving into “extremes of his party.” Mr. Blumenthal closed by speaking of the “relatively small extreme group of ideologues” who are “an anchor” dragging down the budget negotiation process.
How news is made . . .

Update: Later in the day, Mr. Schumer’s spokesman, Brian Fallon, issued this statement about the senator’s remarks: “There’s nothing wrong with reporters overhearing him calling the House Republicans’ [position] extreme, because that’s what it is. He had just given a speech on the Senate floor saying the same thing. The sooner Speaker Boehner abandons the Tea Party’s extreme demands, the sooner there can be a bipartisan deal on the budget.”

--------
CAUGHT: REPORTERS OVERHEAR DEM’S SECRET BUDGET STRATEGY — ‘ALWAYS U...

Posted on March 29, 2011 at 2:21pm by Jonathon M. Seidl
“Um, Senators, ever heard of the mute button?”
That’s how the New York Times — yes the New York Times — begins its story on how Democratic Senators were caught Tuesday morning discussing secret marching orders before a conference call. Apparently, the senators didn’t realize that several of the reporters were already logged into the call and began discussing just how they wanted to verbally paint the GOP, House Speaker John Boehner, and the Tea Party.

The instructions came from the Senate’s No. 3 Democrat, New York’s Charles Schumer. The Times explains his instructions:

After thanking his colleagues — Barbara Boxer of California, Ben Cardin of Maryland, Tom Carper of Delaware and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut — for doing the budget bidding for the Senate Democrats, who are facing off against the House Republicans over how spending for the rest of the fiscal year, Mr. Schumer told them to portray John Boehner of Ohio, the Speaker of the House, as painted into a box by the Tea Party, and to decry the spending cuts that he wants as extreme. “I always use the word extreme,” Mr. Schumer said, “That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.” [Emphasis added]

Eventually, it seems someone did find that mute button. But Schumer‘s instructions didn’t fall on deaf ears. As soon as the call officially started the senators accomplished their mission:

“We are urging Mr. Boehner to abandon the extreme right wing,” said Ms. Boxer, urging the House to compromise on the scale of spending cuts and to drop proposed amendments that would deny federal financing for Planned Parenthood and for government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency.

Mr. Carper continued with the theme, referring to some House Republicans’ “right-wing extremist friends.” Mr. Cardin decried Mr. Boehner giving into “extremes of his party.” Mr. Blumenthal closed by speaking of the “relatively small extreme group of ideologues” who are “an anchor” dragging down the budget negotiation process. [Emphasis added]

Sure, this isn‘t we’re-involved-in-a-third-war shocking — securing messaging is a fact of political life. But it is, if nothing else, worth a chuckle. Especially considering the Democrats — possibly oblivious to the gaffe — said exactly what they said they were going to say.

That, folks, is how the political sausage is made.

Why I Won't Vote to Raise the Debt Limit

Everyone in Washington knows how to cut spending. The time to start is now

By MARCO RUBIO

Americans have built the single greatest nation in all of human history. But America's exceptionalism was not preordained. Every generation has had to confront and solve serious challenges and, because they did, each has left the next better off. Until now.

Our generation's greatest challenge is an economy that isn't growing, alongside a national debt that is. If we fail to confront this, our children will be the first Americans ever to inherit a country worse off than the one their parents were given.

Current federal policies make it harder for job creators to start and grow businesses. Taxes on individuals are complicated and set to rise in less than two years. Corporate taxes will soon be the highest in the industrialized world. Federal agencies torment job creators with an endless string of rules and regulations.

On top of all this, we have an unsustainable national debt. Leaders of both parties have grown our government for decades by spending money we didn't have. To pay for it, they borrowed $4 billion a day, leaving us with today's $14 trillion debt. Half of that debt is held by foreign investors, mostly China. And there is no plan to stop. In fact, President Obama's latest budget request spends more than $46 trillion over the next decade. Under this plan, public debt will equal 87% of our economy in less than 10 years. This will scare away job creators and lead to higher taxes, higher interest rates and greater inflation.

Betting on America used to be a sure thing, but job creators see the warning signs that our leaders ignore. Even the world's largest bond fund, PIMCO, recently dumped its holdings of U.S. debt.

We're therefore at a defining moment in American history. In a few weeks, we will once again reach our legal limit for borrowing, the so-called debt ceiling. The president and others want to raise this limit. They say it is the mature, responsible thing to do.

In fact, it's nothing more than putting off the tough decisions until after the next election. We cannot afford to continue waiting. This may be our last chance to force Washington to tackle the central economic issue of our time.

"Raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure." So said then-Sen. Obama in 2006, when he voted against raising the debt ceiling by less than $800 billion to a new limit of $8.965 trillion. As America's debt now approaches its current $14.29 trillion limit, we are witnessing leadership failure of epic proportions.

I will vote to defeat an increase in the debt limit unless it is the last one we ever authorize and is accompanied by a plan for fundamental tax reform, an overhaul of our regulatory structure, a cut to discretionary spending, a balanced-budget amendment, and reforms to save Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

View Full Image

There is still time to accomplish all this. Rep. Dave Camp has already introduced proposals to lower and simplify our tax rates, close loopholes, and make permanent low rates on capital gains and dividends. Even Mr. Obama has endorsed the idea of lowering our corporate tax rate. Sen. Rand Paul, meanwhile, has a bill that would require an up-or-down vote on "major" regulations, those that cost the economy $100 million or more. And the House has already passed a spending plan this year that lowered discretionary spending by $862 billion over 10 years.

Such reductions are important, but nondefense discretionary spending is a mere 19% of the budget. Focusing on this alone would lead to draconian cuts to essential and legitimate programs. To get our debt under control, we must reform and save our entitlement programs.

No changes should be made to Medicare and Social Security for people who are currently in the system, like my mother. But people decades away from retirement, like me, must accept that reforms are necessary if we want Social Security and Medicare to exist at all by the time we are eligible for them.

Finally, instead of simply raising the debt limit, we should reassure job creators by setting a firm statutory cap on our public debt-to-GDP ratio. A comprehensive plan would wind down our debt to sustainable levels of approximately 60% within a decade and no more than half of the economy shortly thereafter. If Congress fails to meet these debt targets, automatic across-the-board spending reductions should be triggered to close the gap. These public debt caps could go in tandem with a Constitutional balanced budget amendment.

Some say we will go into default if we don't increase the debt limit. But if we simply raise it once again, without a real plan to bring spending under control and get our economy growing, America faces the very real danger of a catastrophic economic crisis.

I know that by writing this, I am inviting political attack. When I proposed reforms to Social Security during my campaign, my opponent spent millions on attack ads designed to frighten seniors. But demagoguery is the last refuge of the spineless politician willing to do anything to win the next election.

Whether they admit it or not, everyone in Washington knows how to solve these problems. What is missing is the political will to do it. I ran for the U.S. Senate because I want my children to inherit what I inherited: the greatest nation in human history. It's not too late. The 21st century can also be the American Century. Our people are ready. Now it's time for their leaders to join them.

Mr. Rubio, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Florida.

Related:

Red Ink Rumble | The American Spectator

The Donald… Donald Trump: Obama presidency possibly illegal and Says American Airports are "Third World"

'To be honest with you, I want him to have a birth certificate'

Posted: March 29, 2011  -  1:35 am Eastern  -  By Joe Kovacs  -  © 2011 WorldNetDaily

Billionaire developer and possible Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is now suggesting Barack Obama's presidency could be "illegal" if legitimate proof is not provided demonstrating the commander in chief is indeed a "natural born citizen" of the U.S.

Trump's use of the "I" word came last night during a phoneinterviewwith Greta Van Susteren of the Fox News Channel.

Help get TV commercials on the air to bust Obama's eligibility wide open!

"To be honest with you, I want him to have a birth certificate," Trump said, "because [otherwise] that would mean that his presidency was, I guess you'd have to say, illegal. You have to be born in the United States. I hope that he was born in the United States. I hope – but I want to get rid of the word hope, I want to know for sure – I hope that he was born in the United States and I hope this doesn't become a big issue."

Video:  Donald Trump on Fox: Obama's Presidency May Be Illegal - 3/28/2011

Trump defended so-called "birthers," explaining, "They just want to see the president was born in this country."

He also called into question Hawaii's Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie for suggesting he remembered when Obama was born nearly a half century ago.

"I'll bet he didn't even know the parents 50 years ago," Trump said. "I think it's absolutely insane. What he's doing is taking a bullet for the party by making a statement that, 'I remember.'"

Trump also wondered why no doctors or nurses have come forward to announce their presence at Obama's birth.

"Here's the president of the United States, and no doctor, no nurse, nobody's come forward saying, 'I delivered that beautiful baby.'"

A photo of Donald Trump's hospital-generated birth certificate (courtesy ABC News)

Earlier in the day,Trump released an image of his own hospital-generated birth certificate from the Jamaica Hospital in Queens, N.Y., and brought up Obama's spending of large sums of money to keep the history of his early years under wraps.

"He spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue. Millions of dollars in legal fees trying to get away from this issue. I brought it up just routinely. All of a sudden a lot of facts are emerging, and I'm starting to wonder myself whether he was born in this country," Trump said on "Fox & Friends."

"This guy either has a birth certificate or he doesn't," he added. "I didn't think it was such a big deal, but I will tell you it's turning out to be a very big deal. Because people now are calling me from all over saying please don't give up on this issue.

AsWND reported just a week ago, not even one person in 10 says Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president, according to a new scientific poll that also reveals political independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue. Another 32 percent would disregard the questions entirely, concluding they are not valid.

While much of the concern centers on Obama's birthcertificate– he's refused to release his originaldocumentspecifying the birth hospital and doctor's name, substituting instead a computer-generated summary of information purportedly in the Hawaii state archives – there are numerous other documents that remain unavailable.

These are the types of records that typically are available for major political leaders such as someone occupying the Oval Office.They include his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records,his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

Source:  WND  -  Donald Trump: Obama presidency possibly illegal - http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=280725#ixzz1I0xgDiRI

Donald Trump: American Airports are "Third World"

The appeal of Donald Trump is due to the man’s bluntness. It’s remarkably refreshing to hear, even if you disagree with his conclusions.

For instance, The Donald is no fan of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, telling HUMAN EVENTS that Iraq in particular is now the “Harvard University of terrorism.”  Trump would rather build American infrastructure, rather than the infrastructure of some foreign country, especially in a region of the world where a costly piece of property is likely to get blown sky high.

Trump’s philosophy: “I want to build our highways.  When I look at airports in China, at airports in Abu Dhabi and Qatar and the different places, [and then] you land in New York, at LaGuardia Airport, at Kennedy Airport, it’s like a Third World airport system.” (We can attest, LaGuardia Airport is on par with a rat hole.)

Here’s part three of our wide-ranging and in-depth interview with one of the most successful businessmen in the history of the planet. Besides America’s crumbling infrastructure, don’t miss what he has to say about George W. Bush.

Exit question: If a President Donald Trump were given what he thought was solid intelligence from this country and our allies abroad, that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and was ready to use them, what would he have done? Find out.

Source:  Human Events

Related:

On GretaWire: DONALD TRUMP going ON THE RECORD at 10pm (and is HE fired up!)  -  Donald the Birther?

On GretaWire: Amb John Bolton, Gov Sarah Palin, Kirsten Powers, Donald Trump ….all …  -   Palin on Obama's 'War'  & Amb Bolton: Who's Really in Charge of Libya Mission?

O’Leary:  NRA, Evangelical (and Tea Party) Uprising Will Win in 2012

Rush:  Trump’s Birth Certificate Outcry Is Service to Everyone

VIDEO: Donald Trump Takes on Whoopi, 'The View' Over Obama's Birth Certificate

Exclusive to NewsMax:  Donald Trump Releases His Birth Certificate  -  As all presidential candidates legally must if asked.

Group Warns EPA ready to increase radioactive release guidelines - As Nuclear Alert for Fukushima Reveals a Meltdown Has Started

The EPA is preparing to dramatically increase permissible radioactive releases in drinking water, food and soil after “radiological incidents,” according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

What is termed a guidance that EPA is considering - as opposed to a regulation - does not require public airing before it’s decided upon.

EPA officials contacted today in the Atlanta and D.C. offices had no response on the issue as of 6 p.m.

The radiation guides called Protective Action Guides or PAGs are protocols for responding to radiological events ranging from nuclear power-plant accidents to dirty bombs.

Drinking water, for example, would have a huge increase in allowable public exposure to radioactivity, the group says, that would include:

A nearly 1000-fold increase in strontium-90

A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for iodine-131

An almost 25,000 rise for nickel-63

The new radiation guidance would also allow long-term cleanup standards thousands of times more lax than anything EPA has ever before accepted, permitting doses to the public that EPA itself estimates would cause a cancer in as much as every fourth person exposed, the group says.

These relaxed standards are opposed by public health professionals inside EPA, according to documents PEER said it obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

PEER is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals

Source:  The Tennessean

NUCLEAR ALERT FUKUSHIMA...MELTDOWN STARTED - PLUTONIUM LEAK OF RADIATION OFFICIALS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JV09rHS1JY&feature=feedf

The contradictory reports are confusing the public.
Expert on ABC News Admits Slow Meltdown is Already Happening

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfegXmTRZdM&feature=feedf

This is a copy - the original was pulled from the Internet. This is heartbreaking!

Radiation in Massachusetts Rainwater Likely From Japan

I found this posted late yesterday on Free Republic.
Full text:

A text message from my nephew in Japan. He works for a contractor that services news organizations worldwide.

MARK - ARRIVED HERE ONE WEEK AFTER QUAKE. 145 MILES FROM REACTORS. AREA IS INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE COMPOUND. WE HAVE TRUCKS FOOD WATER FUEL GENERATORS BATTERIES BEDDING HYGIENE CAMERAS DISH AND RADIOS DROPPED HERE 8 DAYS BEFORE QUAKE. 2 - 6.0+ QUAKES HERE SINCE. BUILDINGS OK. 3 NEWS TEAMS USING OUR STUFF. BUSY. NRC AND DOD HAS WAREHOUSES IN HERE. DOD JUST SET UP SECURITY. NRC GUYS HERE ARE PISSED. THEY WANTED MILES OF TRASH BURNED BEFORE IT COULD BLOW AND FLOAT INTO THE NORTH PACIFIC GYRE. NOW IT IS CONTAMINATED AND BURNING MAY BE BAD. US STATE DEPARTMENT AND JAPANESE GOVERNMENT STOPPED THE BURN. RESUPPLY HERE SLOW. BE HOME MAY 15-20. BACK HERE IF CONTRACTS SIGNED BY JUNE. GITD GARY-

Source: TEXT FROM JAPAN

Radiation In Massachusetts Rainwater Likely From Japan

BOSTON -- Health officials said Sunday that one sample of Massachusetts rainwater has registered very low concentrations of radiation, most likely from the Japanese nuclear power plant damaged earlier this month by an earthquake and tsunami.

John Auerbach, the Massachusetts commissioner of public health, said that radioiodine-131 found in the sample – one of more than 100 that have been taken around the country – has a short life of only eight days. He said the drinking water supply in the state was unaffected and officials do not expect any health concerns.

Nevada and other Western states also have reported minuscule amounts of radiation, but scientists say those presented no health risks.

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health said the in-state sample was taken in the past week, but they did not say where. The testing is part of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency network that monitors for radioactivity.

State officials said similar testing was done in California, Pennsylvania, Washington and other states, and showed comparable levels of I-131 in rain.

Massachusetts testing last week of samples from the Quabbin and Wachusett reservoirs showed no detectable levels of I-131, health officials said.

Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Richard K. Sullivan Jr. directed the Department of Environmental Protection to collect additional samples for testing from several water bodies across Massachusetts. Results will be available over the next several days.

In Japan, mounting problems, including miscalculated radiation figures and inadequate storage tanks for huge amounts of contaminated water, stymied emergency workers Sunday as they struggled to bring the country's nuclear complex back from the edge of disaster. Workers were trying to remove radioactive water from the nuclear compound and restart the regular cooling systems for the dangerously hot fuel.

Source:  HuffPost Green

Video:  Radioactive iodine-131 DETECTED in rain water - Massachusetts - March 27, 2011

Video:  URGENT - USA / Europe - Radiation and Jet stream FORECAST UPDATE - march 27, 2011

Also, Congressman Ed Markey is suggesting people within a 20 mile radius from a Nuclear plant take potassium iodide as a precaution.  Isn’t that peculiar, just as the EPA is upping the allowable levels?!?  See Here: Group Warns EPA Ready to increase Radioactive Release Guidelines.

I’m with him!!  Better to err on the side of caution!

Related:

Dr. Mercola:  Why 95% of Japanese May Not Suffer from Radioactive Iodine Exposure

Potassium Iodide Runs Low As Americans Seek It Out

Total Collapse - The Build-up to World War III

Video:  Total Collapse – The Build-Up to World War III

O'Leary: NRA, Evangelical Uprising Will Win in 2012

The GOP has a clear shot at retaking the White House in 2012, but winning will require strong support from core groups such as the National Rifle Association, Christian conservatives, and the ever-expanding tea party movement, veteran political consultant and best-selling author Brad O’Leary tells Newsmax.

“How can Obama be beaten? You have to talk to the people about what he really believes.” says O’Leary, publisher of The O’Leary Report and co-author of a book in process titled “How Obama Can Be Defeated in 2012.”

“You’re not going to be able to fight this election and win unless you have the support of the NRA. That’s a truism we can start with,” says O’Leary, who adds that the current administration’s poor record on gun rights has cost the Democrats dearly in recent elections.

Video:  O’Leary :  NRA, Evangelical Uprising Will Win in 2012

“In his heart, President [Barack] Obama would love to take on the NRA. He believes that restrictions on owning a gun can be put in place by the states. Hardly anyone in America would be able to own a gun,” O’Leary says. “Will the Democratic Party, who suffered such a calamity in the last election, have the guts to take on the NRA? I think they’ll choose to be hypocrites all the way.”

The NRA's power will be on display next month at its annual members' meeting in Pittsburgh. Attendance hit a record of 71,000 last year, and this year's event could draw an all-time high of 75,000.

In a wide-ranging interview with Newsmax.TV, O’Leary also expounded on:

• The solid cadre of national conservative candidates and how that field is likely to shake out this election cycle
• The administration’s efforts to appoint activist judges to rewrite the Constitution and impinge on American freedoms
• Obama’s brand of Christianity and how it fuels his strong belief in the redistribution of wealth.

Like NRA members, O’Leary says Christian conservatives are likely to be driven to the polls in record numbers in 2012 to hold the line on issues and positions they feel the Obama administration is threatening.

“Religious conservatives … weren’t out in massive number last election but they’re there,” O’Leary tells Newsmax. “Anyone who thinks we solved gay marriage, and solved many other issues that would turn people out doesn’t know anything about America.

“Since the Civil War, churches have played an important part in turning out their people to vote in elections,” he says.
Even with the NRA and the Christian vote secured, however, GOP candidates need to be mindful of the burgeoning power of the tea party, O’Leary adds.

“Any successful candidate . . . is going to have to have the support of groups like the tea party,” he insists. “They are not going away. They didn’t come to the table and elect so many people, especially electing 700 new state representatives, [to] then fade into the darkness of politics.

“They are going to have more time to organize, more time to turn people out, and they’re going to get you focusing on the issues.”

O’Leary says he thinks all of the candidates being mentioned in the 2012 GOP presidential mix will be willing to take the gloves off and challenge Obama on the issues in a way they didn’t in 2008.

Most of the candidates and potential candidates now aren’t getting a lot of attention from voters because they aren’t as “flashingly politically famous as we’ve had in previous elections.”

O’Leary’s take on some of the top GOP contenders:

Mitt Romney: “Tested. Good organization and business background. Hasn’t quite learned the terms that are going to sell his vision yet.”

Mike Huckabee: “Has a certain warmth that gets through to his audience and will get through to America.”

Sarah Palin: “She loves her family so much and owes so much to them. Running for president is very difficult, but if she decides to run, she has the right priorities!”

Tim Pawlenty: “Started slow. Picked up momentum. He could be the last guy standing.”

Haley Barbour: “Successful at everything he’s done. The more you see Haley, the more you like him.”

Rick Santorum: “Been silent politically for years. Just allowing himself to get re-known by the American public.”

Donald Trump: “Hard time believing someone as successful as Trump is going to take the time necessary to run for president.  But he is beholden to no one and speaks his mind.”

On the subject of activist judges, O’Leary calls Supreme Court justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor “total examples” of the administration’s desire to effect liberal legislative changes from the bench.

Source: Newsmax

Related:

NRA Boss Unveils Shocking News On Radio

Michele Bachmann Steals the Show in Iowa

Is Romney Really a Tea Party Favorite?

Bolton: Obama Still Not Qualified to be President

The (Created) Hate for Sarah Palin 

Huckabee Has Slight Edge, Palin Down, in GOP '12 Preferences

Monica Crowley Refutes Eleanor Clift’s Claim Tea Party Candidate Can’t Win National Election

VIDEO:  NOW...Is It Time To IMPEACH Barack Obama? [HQ]

UN ordered depopulation of 3 billion people by food malnutrition has started – PBSpecial Report

Posted by PCSpecial Report Monday, December 13th, 2010

While investigating the WHO and UN role in the biological weapons attack called the A-H1N1 (Swine Flu) pandemic of 2009, criminal intelligence (CI) agents from Canada and the US have stumbled upon a covert and sinister plan to kill off as many as 3 billion people by food malnutrition. The organization that is responsible for preparing for the murder of 3 billion people is called the Codex Alimentarius Commission. It was established in 1963 by the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Their officially stated purpose is to develop international food standards to protect consumer health and to facilitate fair trading practices in foods. Today, there are 181 member governments including Canada. CI agents have uncovered the real purpose of this WHO / UN organization – to murder 3 billion people. How will they murder some 3 billion people?

It was Henry Kissinger, who in 1974 conceived the idea of the food genocide to control world population – less people to consume world resources – more for the rich nations (elites) to exploit the sources of the world to satisfy their greed. On December 10, 1974 the US National Security Council under Henry Kissinger prepared a classified study ‘National Security Study Memorandum 200 (Full text of NSSM 200 (governmental source – pdf file)) – which falsely claimed that the worldwide population growth poses a great threat to US national security interests.

US Air Force weapon of mass destruction military installation called HAARP – live cam image from November 29, 2010. Red arrow points to military truck parked at installation and lights are clearly shown to be on at each of the trailers. HAARP is active and is responsible for causing recent earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, heat waves and monsoon rainfall that caused major flooding.

Classified UN documents reveal that 1 billion people will be killed by starvation as UN trade agreements and WHO health moratoriums will forbid any country from selling and exporting any food to targeted regions for depopulation. Starvation of 3 billion people has already begun as the United States has been using its weapon of mass destruction called HAARP to control, alter and intensify the weather of the targeted nations. This past summer HAARP was used to create a heat wave in Russia, resulting in the near complete destruction of its crops. Also this past summer the US used HAARP to cause the massive flooding in China and Pakistan – an attempt to wipe out the crops of China and Pakistan resulting in the mass starvation of their populations. 2 billion more will be murdered by diseases and illnesses associated with malnutrition from crop destruction, pasteurization and irradiation. The Codex Alimentarius Commission will be responsible for causing disease and illness from malnutrition by implementing the 2 latter killing instruments. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has begun this process by labeling the life sustaining nutrients (vitamins, minerals and enzymes) in our foods as poisons. Now that nutrients are classified as poisons they have been given the authority by the United Nations to eradicate all nutrients in our foods. They have already begun the eradication process by pasteurizing (exposing to high heat) and irradiating (exposing to radiation) all of our food. Milk was the first to be targeted for eradication as milk is the most important life sustenance on Earth. It is packed full of vitamins, minerals and enzymes. All essential for keeping us healthy and alive. Next was eggs. Another very important food that keeps us very healthy and alive.

With the recent false declarations of E. coli contamination in fruits and vegetables the member nations of The Codex Alimentarius Commission have been ordered to pasteurize or irradiate all fruit and vegetables. Why? Pasteurization and irradiation destroys all of the nutritional value of our food. These processes don’t eliminate the microorganism they claim they are killing in our food. It kills the organisms and everything else including the vitamin, mineral and enzyme content of our food. Furthermore pasteurization and irradiation doesn’t clean or filter out the bad organisms in our food it just kills them and when we drink or eat pasteurized or irradiated foods and beverages we are consuming the dead, rotting and disease and illness causing bodies of the organisms. Because all of the vitamins, minerals and enzymes have been destroyed by pasteurization and irradiation your body can’t stop or fight off the disease and illnesses caused by consuming the dead and rotting organisms.

Who is behind this mass murder of 3 billion people?

In the investigation of the WHO and UN plans for murdering 3 billion people there is one region of the World that seems to have been exempted. The only region that is not being targeted for mass depopulation are the countries that made up old Europe. Why everywhere else but old Europe. Because, according to information written in the classified UN documents, Canada, the US, China, Russia, Pakistan, the Middle East and Africa are nations populated with people who are considered inferior races. The only superior race of people is the Aryan Race. Adolf Hitler started WWII to reinstate the Aryans as a master race of Indo-Europeans. The Aryans are supposed to be Nordic in appearance and directly ancestral to the Germans. During WWII the Nazi SS officers and soldiers were put in charge of slaughtering all inferior races of people by whatever means possible, including; war, famine, poison, biological diseases and mass executions. Today the UN has been put in charge of slaughtering as many as 3 billion people.

Very few people realize that the UN was created by former high ranking politicians and war criminal officers of Nazi Germany. Even fewer people know that an International organization existed during WWII and it was that League of Allied Nations who were responsible for the defeat of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. Immediately after WWII the League of Nations was destroyed by the Nazi Germans in retaliation for defeating them in WWII. In its place the Nazi Germans formed the UN. The UN (the negative prefix un means – Opposite of; contrary to: unrest.) was formed to bring about global unrest. Once global unrest was achieved a New World Order governed by “The Four principles” (The Fourth Reich) – * One Leader * One Budget * One Programme and * One Office would be implemented. To have an understanding of the clandestine agenda of the UN you must have an understanding of the meaning of Reich. Reich is the territory or government of a German state, as the Holy Roman Empire (the Vatican), or First Reich , from 962 to 1806; the German Empire, or Second Reich, from 1871 to 1919 (Germany’s WWI); the Weimar Republic, from 1919 to 1933; and the Third Reich, from 1933 to 1945 (Nazi Germany’s WWII). The Nazi formed United Nations launched the“Delivering as One” initiative in 2007 – the Fourth Reich. Today Germany is once again the leader of the new and Fourth Reich. A former Nazi German Youth – Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger ( served the Third Reich for at least 4 years) is now leader of the Vatican – the original or First Reich.

The Nazi war criminals also formed many of the International and national organizations we have today, including NATO (created by commanding officers and ex-multinational conscripts that made up the German Waffen SS army units), the CIA (created by former Gestapo agents to spy on, sabotage, torture and kill agents, military personal and political figureheads of the Soviet Union ), the WHO (created by former Auschwitz death camp scientists and physicians), NASA (created using former Nazi rocket scientists who were smuggled into the US in Operation Paperclip).

Now that our governments have been ordered by the Nazi UN to begin pasteurizing and irradiating every consumable food the only question left to ask is “how much time do we have left before we starve to death from eating?”

A viewer just reminded me of a very important historical fact that relates to this story. I was reminded of the fact that the Royal Family of England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Windsor, are actually descendants of the German arm of European Royalty – the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family. Due to anti-German sentiment in the United Kingdom during the German Reich World War I, George V of the United Kingdom changed the name of his branch from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor in 1917. The same happened in Belgium where it was changed to “van België” (Dutch) or “de Belgique” (French). The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is a German dynasty, the senior line of the Saxon House of Wettin that ruled the Ernestine duchies, including the duchy of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. The House of Wettin is a dynasty of German counts, dukes, prince-electors (Kurfürsten) and kings that once ruled the area of today’s German states of Saxony, the Saxon part of Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia for more than 800 years as well as holding at times the kingship of Poland. Agnates of the House of Wettin have, at various times, ascended the thrones of Great Britain, Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Saxony, and Belgium; of these, only the British and Belgian lines retain their thrones today. This historical fact means that Germans rule the United Kingdom, Canada and a host of other Commonwealth Nations. The head of state in Canada is the sovereign or Queen of Canada (a German from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) . The Queen’s powers are exercised by the Governor General of Canada except when the Queen is in Canada. The Governor General, like the sovereign or Queen, is not political and remains above politics. That would suggest that Canada and other Commonwealth Nations are servants of the German Reich.

Source: Short URL: http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=131

Too Crazy to believe?  Not Sure??  Do your homework.  There is a lot of information out there that confirms the data in this article.  Check it out for yourself.

Related:

Bill Gates Confirms Population Reduction Through Vaccination on CNN

Bill Gates:  Register Every Birth by Cellphone To Ensure Vaccination, Control Population Growth

Hillary Clinton:  Population Control Will Now Become the Centerpiece of U.S. Foreign Policy