GBTV - Where the Truth Lives

Election Season 2014

And it has brought us to this trainwreck called ObamaCare and we have bankrupted our kids and grandkids!

We are now headed into the 2014 Election Season and common sense and conservatism are on the rise. Please stand-up and be counted!

Reading Collusion: How the Media Stole the 2012 Election is a great place to start!

The Founding Father's Real Reason for the Second Amendment

And remember the words of Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." See Video of Suzanna Gratia-Hupp’s Congressional Testimony: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For, below (u-tube HERE).

The Leaders Are Here... Palin, Cruz, Lee, Paul, Chaffetz....


Can You Really Still Believe That None of These People Would Have Done a Better Job???

Bloggers' Rights at EFF


Friday, December 31, 2010

The Evolution of the Tea Party and a Look at the Constitution They Believe In

2010 was the year of the rise & FALL of the American Marxists. May we NEVER forget it.  And the reason they did not succeed was the rise of the Tea Party and other patriot groups!!  There continuance and our return to Constitutional law, God and Patriotism is what will save America from going by the way of Rome and ever other empire and super power; most only last 200-years.  We are standing at the presuppose of destruction or rebuilding and beating the historical cycle right now!!

The Tea Party

Video Trailer: The Tea Party Movie  -  The Evolution of the Tea Party

The Tea Party Movie Site

Give Us Liberty: A Tea Party Manifesto

The Tea Party Manifesto

A New American Tea Party: The Counterrevolution Against Bailouts, Handouts, Reckless Spending, and More Taxes

Also:  Tea Party: The Documentary Film

Andrew Breitbart - Santa Ana Tea Party

Andrew Breitbart at Westwood CA Tea Party April 2009

Beginning of Human Circle Around the Captial in DC 03.20.10

Human Circle of Tea Party Activists Around the Capital in DC Protesting the Passage of ObamaCare

Young Citadel Cadets Spoke in Charlston SC

Young Cadets at Charleston SC Tea Party

OC Tea Party - Reagan

Atlanta Tea PartyWestwood TP May 17th - Not My Cup of TeaMichelle Malkin - Conversation with MMMaya In Atlanta

Maya in Atlanta

C-Span Link to Entire Restoring Honor Rally (03:28:29)


Martin Luther King’s Niece Alveda King Praying with Glenn Beck

Sarah and Alveda 8.28.10

Sarah Palin and Alveda King and 8.28 Rally

MLK’s Niece, Dr. Alveda King to Stand With Glenn Beck at ‘Restore Honor Event in…

Tonight! America's Divine Destiny


Glenn Beck at 8.28 Rally


8.28 Restoring Honor Event – A God Inspired Event

Glenn Beck Devine Destiny and Restoring Honor

imageBlack Robe Coalition of Pastors, Priests, Rabbis, Imams and Patriotic Holy Men and Women from All Over the US at 8.28 Event

082910glenn05Laura Ingraham Book Signing at Nixon Library 072610-22

Sarah Palin in Prayer Before 8.28 Speech

Laura Ingraham at Book Signing (The Obama Diaries) at Nixon Library

Some new (Palin endorsed) Tea Party Candidates who won in the  2010 mid-terms


A Serious Look at the Constitution that the Tea Party defends and believes in!!

Serious Look at the US Constitution

Video:  A Serious Look at the Constitution

The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and all of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

America: Freedom to Fascism (Full Length Movie)

Movie: America: Freedom to Fascism

Video:  America:  Freedom to Fascism – Full Length Movie

More info at: 

Who Really Controls America??

George Carlin - "Who Really Controls America"  -  Some Rough Language

Remember: “Those who dance are considered crazy by those who cannot hear the music!” …George Carlin


Think the above isn’t true or couldn’t happen… check these out and please think about it.

Feds Sneaking Around Congress to Regulate Firearms

Why the Rush?

Video:  Judge Napolitano 'Who will protect us from the government?'

FCC Votes 3-2 to Regulate Internet via Net Neutrality… Even though they have no authority to do so

Republicans Cave, Start Treaty on Fast Track to Pass  -  It passed~

Encore – Obama Repeats Appearance on Most Corrupt List… Joined by Boxer, Emanuel, Ensign, Pelosi, Rangel, Waters…

Sunday Evening Surprise: Famine… uh Food Bill Passes Senate Unanimously

Obama’s Last Minute Gifts

Some Things Just Cannot Be Buried~

Obama Worshiper Chris Matthews: Obama Should Release Birth Certificate

(Remember… Chris Matthews is the guy who said he gets a tingle up his leg whenever he hears Obama speak… and even he wonders why Obama won’t produce his documents?!?)

By Jim Meyers

Even MSNBC’s pro-Obama host Chris Matthews has joined the crowd calling on the president to release his long-form birth certificate to settle the controversy surrounding his birthplace once and for all, saying “if it exists, why not put it out?”

Matthews has been critical of the so-called “birthers” who insist that Obama was not born in the United States and therefore is ineligible to be president. Some say he was actually born in Kenya, his father’s home country.

The majority of Americans discount that conspiracy theory. Hawaii state officials insist he was born on the tropical isles, and a legal ad taken out in a local newspaper announcing Obama’s birth days after he was born supports that claim.

Still, many find it interesting that Obama has continued to refuse to release his long-form birth certificate, and Obama joins just a handful of presidents who have no declared place of birth as a significant national landmark.

Instead, during the 2008 campaign, Obama’s aides issued a “certification of live birth,” a summary document that does not include the name of the hospital where he was born or the physician who delivered him, information that would be included on the long-form birth certificate.

Newly elected Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, a Democrat, re-ignited the ‘birther controversy’ when he said he would ask the state attorney general’s office and health officials how he can make public more of Obama’s birth documentation from Aug. 4, 1961.

Obama easily could release the document himself or ask state officials to do so.

During Matthews’ “Hardball” program on Monday night, the MSNBC hosted cited a New York Times poll from April that found that only 58 percent of respondents believe Obama was born in the United States, while 20 percent believe he was not, and 23 percent are unsure.

“I am not a birther,” Matthews declared. “I am an enemy of the birthers.”

But he held up the long-form birth certificate of someone who was born the day before Obama, and compared it with the shorter version Obama has released, which to the birthers, he said, “is evidence that he really ain’t one of us.

“Why has the president himself not demanded that they put out the official document?” Matthews said.

“Why doesn’t the governor just say, snap it up, whoever’s there at the department of records, send me a copy right now? Why doesn’t the president just say, send me a copy right now? Why doesn’t [White House press secretary Robert] Gibbs and [senior adviser David] Axelrod say, let’s just get this crappy story dead? Why not do it?

“The department out there just said the other day that there is such a thing. It exists. The original document of his birth is available. They have it in storage, they said. And if it exists, why not put it out?

“Will there be any harm done by releasing the original document?”

After a discussion with panelists Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune and David Corn of Mother Jones, Matthews concluded: “I’m sure we’ve gotten to the bottom of this as much as mortal men can.”

But Obama’s critics — many of whom don’t buy in the birther theory he was born outside the United States — still note a pattern of secrecy surrounding much of Obama’s life before he entered politics. They note that many Obama never has unveiled many key documents that presidential candidates released to the press and public.

For example:

  • During the presidential campaign, Obama released just one brief document detailing his personal health, while GOP opponent John McCain released what he said was his complete medical file totaling more than 1,500 pages. The Obama campaign eventually released some routine lab-test results and electrocardiograms for Obama.
  • Obama refused to offer his official papers as a state legislator in Illinois and did not produce correspondence, such as letters from lobbyists and other information, from his days in the Illinois State Senate.
  • Obama did not release his client list as an attorney or his billing records.
  • Obama declined to release his college records from Occidental College, where he studied for two years before transferring to Columbia University.
  • Obama’s campaign refused to give Columbia University, where he earned an undergraduate degree in political science, permission to release his transcripts. Such transcripts would list the courses Obama took, and his grades.
  • Obama’s college dissertation, reportedly titled “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament,” has disappeared from Columbia’s archives.
  • Obama did not agree to the release of his application to the Illinois state bar, which would clear up intermittent allegations that his application to the bar may have been inaccurate.
  • Obama has not released records from his time at Harvard Law School.
  • During his campaign for president, Obama promised he would make his White House “the most open and transparent administration in history.”

Chris Matthews: Why Doesn’t Obama Just Release the Birth Certificate?

Chris Matthews: Why Doesn’t Obama Just Release the Birth Certificate? Part 2

And isn’t that the whole question? Why does that guy who promised to be the most transparent President ever when he was a candidate refuse to produce the long and official form of his birth certificate plus all the rest of the documents above… if he is honest, really a qualified citizen to be president and has nothing to hide?  Why?

Editor’s Note: Find out about “Obama Secret Czar Power” in the Newsmax Special Report – Click Here Now.

Source: NewsMax - Chris Matthews: Obama Should Release Birth Certificate

 At a boy Dick

With friends like 72 year old Democratic Governor elect of Hawaii, undocumented B. Hussein Obama doesn't need enemies.

Abercrombie has now vowed to change Hawaii law, from what that Obamite Gov. Linda Lingle just signed into law protecting undocumented Obama. Yes Dick, is going to release Obama's documents one way or the other to deal with the "demon infested hordes" called the Birthers, in Dick's analogy.

There is a quote from Dick which makes me wonder how senile this Obama friend is:

Mr. Abercrombie said that while he did not see the Obamas at the hospital with their newborn son, he does remember the couple bringing baby Barack to social events. He said those who suggest Mr. Obama’s mother somehow slipped off to Kenya to give birth to him are engaging in a “demonological fantasy.”

(Google does not show "demonological" as a word. Another Obama miracle of creation.)

This sort of interests this blog as Dick Abercrombie is now on record stating that he had witnessed the Obama's and child at least twice at some social events in Hawaii.

Now this is most interesting as in 1961 most women did not take their little bundles of joy out into the world for weeks. The problem with that is Stanley Ann Duham Obama's girlfriend in Washington states that Stanley Ann was in that state around the time those Obamite reporters were reporting birth notices were being published in Hawaiian newspapers.

The real problem for Dick's perjerous testimony is Stanley Ann Dunham is recorded to have been attending college classes on the mainland in the fall of 1961.

Translation is Barry Obama was born in August. Fall semester classes start in September. That leaves a very small window for Dick to have been socializing with baby Obama, because testimony is on record stating Stanley Ann was in Washington state shortly after the recorded birth date in August.

So either Democrat Dick Abercrombie is committing perjury or he is senile. His timeline just does not match the facts laid out which we do know is at least as real as other people's memories who would have no political reason to lie.

I look forward to Dick releasing the Obama papers. I look forward to the Indonesian adoption records by Lolo Soetoro. I look forward to the Pan Am airlines travel records for Stanley Ann and Barry Soetoro. I look forward to the passport documentation concerning Hawaii, which will all prove what this Birther has focused on from the start in Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro is a British subject under the British Nationality Act of 1948, is an adopted Indonesian.

Mr. Obama admitted that he was British and therefore no matter how furious Dick gets at Birthers, the reality is, B. Hussein is tri part citizen of 3 nations, (Britain, Kenya and the United States) which makes him unable to serve as President of America, although he could still be President of Kenya or Prime Minister of England.

So Dick, get on the stick and release them papers, as it will either prove you liar or it will prove what Birthers have stated all along in undocumented Obama is not qualified to be President as a tri part citizen, and as an illegal alien in America.

Oh and Dick..............

I bet the Obama White House is going to be phoning you with a bribe from Val-erie Jarrett like she did Nancy Pelosi in that bribe to shut her up...........

Don't take the cash Dick. Hold out for Chinese jade or gold, as Obama has destroyed the Dollar.

This should be rich in Eric Holder suing the state of Hawaii like he is Arizona to protect illegal alien Obama from being discovered, and suing Democratic Governor Dick Abercrombie.

agtG – Lame Cherry


Rush on WikiLeaks:  Where’s Obama’s Birth Certificate

Arizona House to Obama:  No Birth Certificate, No Ballot

ShoreBank, Obama’s Mother, Tim Geithner’s Father

The Jarrett Connection

Obama Family CIA Connection

Forbes Article:  How Obama Thinks…

The Roots of Obama's Rage


Obama's Last-Minute Gifts

Obama's Last-Minute Gifts

By George Neumayr  -  American Spectator

A tension always exists between the cocky rhetoric of the left and its undemocratic tactics. Were left-wing ideas as popular as they claim, liberals wouldn't need to advance them in such an underhanded way. "Progress" on the causes most dear to them usually take place not at the ballot box but in judicial chambers, or, as it happens this week, in an undemocratic lame-duck session of Congress.

A smug and beaming Obama declared at the signing ceremony for the repeal of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy on Wednesday that people will look back and wonder why homosexuality in the military was a "source of controversy in the first place." But people are more likely to look back and wonder why such an arrogant president who enjoyed total control over Washington for two years had to wait until a lame-duck session after his party got pulverized at the polls to pass the repeal.

That just shows the repeal is an elitist, not populist, victory, one which a future Edward Gibbon will mark down as yet another illustration of an insular political class's delusion and decadence at a time of terrorism. This elite has long wanted to tear down the military and turn it into a laboratory of political correctness, and Obama has smuggled this gift to his friends through the backdoor of a lame-duck session.

In his remarks on Wednesday, he said that gay soldiers will no longer be forced to "live a lie." Never mind that one can't be forced to join an all-volunteer army. Moreover, he showed no concern about the new deception a majority of combat troops who object to the repeal will now have to live. Those soldiers must swallow the lie of political correctness. In order to stay in the military or get promoted in it, they will henceforth have to pretend to accept all the pro-gay propaganda and pro-gay reeducation sure to follow the repeal. They are now expected to be as enthusiastic about brotherly lust as they had formerly been about brotherly love.

Obama revealed in his signing-ceremony remarks what was foremost in his mind during his very first meeting with his generals: not defeating America's enemies at a time of war but liberalizing the military. "Ending 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' was a topic in my first meeting with Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen, and the Joint Chiefs. We talked about how to end this policy. We talked about how success in both passing and implementing this change depended on working closely with the Pentagon. And that's what we did," he said.

So, while insurgents and terrorists trained, Obama was sitting around with his generals and worrying about how to make the U.S. military gay-friendly. The irony of this "historic" democratizing of the military is that he had to use the undemocratic means of threatened court decisions and a lame-duck session to achieve it.

"We are on the side of history," liberals like to burble, especially after a moment of "progress" such as this one. But this bragging sounds suspicious this week, since the big news from the Census is that Americans are migrating to parts of the country the left regards as racist and homophobic.

Under the new numbers of the Census, liberal bastions like New York and Massachusetts will lose congressional districts, while conservative states like Texas and Arizona will pick new ones up. Most of the shrinking states that are losing congressional districts voted for Obama.

To blunt these population trends, the left will have to resort to the undemocratic tricks afforded them by judicial activists, one of which is the Voting Rights Act.

"With Republicans in control of many state legislatures and governorships after November's historic election, the GOP will have the upper hand during the politically charged battles that take place in the states every decade over the redrawing of congressional boundaries," reports the Washington Post. "This does not give Republicans the ability to draw the lines anywhere they choose. Certain states with a history of racial discrimination are required by the federal Voting Rights Act to draw boundaries in a way that does not put minority populations at a disadvantage."

A movement that relies on politically correct gerrymandering, judicial activism, and lame-duck legislation for its victories speaks not for the people but only for an increasingly manipulative and arrogant elite.

George Neumayr is editor of Catholic World Report and press critic for California Political Review.


Proud Soldier l 12. 23.10

The Military needs to be able to recruit and use the troops it needs in the way it needs to win, not worry about social or political correctness!!

Ret. Marine| 12.23.10 @ 6:38AM

Jeez, why did he have to wait until a lame-duck session to pass these traitorous activities? truth be told, if even half of the We the People were paying attention to this traitor ( especially since its that time of the year for the Christian festivities), Obamas Bin Ly'n, he would have had that smug face of his ⁢*h slapped back to the reality that, a) he could have not got it done because everyone knew first it would not have been made under normal circumstances with adults leading, b) he could not have otherwise gotten a vote for moral-treason without the help of those who just got their arses handed back with the pink slips involved and c) they don't have to answer to anyone, with the exception of God for their treason against the American Public's safety, no one, I repeat no one sells out our National Defense so easily without being involved in a massive cover-up to get a piece of paper with a traitors signature on it. Its all in the plan to "fundamentally" transform our beloved Republic into some hodgepodge punked arse half-black-white sedition setup with no one at the helm to charge him. I am certain history will make notes in a manner of a traitors intentions. May his name be along side that of Satan because he is the one responsible for the treason against this Christian Nation. What a punk we have as a so-called president, no he nothing short of a traitor and I'll be sure to tell the grandchildren who was responsible for their chains of slavery, Hussein, 52% of the idiots that placed this illegal alien in his place, and those who though it was a-o.k. to steal their safety from them.

Political End Runs

By Thomas Sowell – posted at |

The Constitution of the United States begins with the words "We the people." But neither the Constitution nor "we the people" will mean anything if politicians and judges can continue to do end runs around both.

Bills passed too fast for anyone to read them are blatant examples of these end runs. But last week, another of these end runs appeared in a different institution when the medical "end of life consultations" rejected by Congress were quietly enacted through bureaucratic fiat by administrators of Medicare.

Although Congressman Earl Blumenauer and Senator Jay Rockefeller had led an effort by a group of fellow Democrats in Congress to pass Section 1233 of pending Medicare legislation, which would have paid doctors to include "end of life" counseling in their patients' physical checkups, the Congress as a whole voted to delete that provision.

Republican Congressman John Boehner, soon to become Speaker of the House, objected to this provision in 2009, saying: "This provision may start us down a treacherous path toward government-encouraged euthanasia."

Whatever the merits or demerits of the proposed provision in Medicare legislation, the Constitution of the United States makes the elected representatives of "we the people" the ones authorized to make such decisions. But when proposals explicitly rejected by a vote in Congress are resurrected and stealthily made the law of the land by bureaucratic fiat, there has been an end run around both the people and the Constitution.

Congressman Blumenauer's office praised the Medicare bureaucracy's action but warned: "While we are very happy with the result, we won't be shouting it from the rooftops because we are not out of the woods yet."

In other words, don't let the masses know about it.

It is not only members of Congress or the administration who treat "we the people" and the Constitution as nuisances to do an end run around. Judges, including Justices of the Supreme Court, have been doing this increasingly over the past hundred years.

During the Progressive era of the early 20th century, the denigration of the Constitution began, led by such luminaries as Princeton scholar and future President of the United States Woodrow Wilson, future Harvard Law School Dean Roscoe Pound and future Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.

As a Professor at Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson wrote condescendingly of "the simple days of 1787" when the Constitution was written and how, in our presumably more complex times, "each generation of statesmen looks to the Supreme Court to supply the interpretation which will serve the needs of the day."

This kind of argument would be repeated for generations, with no more evidence that 1787 was any less complicated than later years than Woodrow Wilson presented-- which was none-- and with no more reasons why the need for "change" meant that unelected judges should be the ones making those changes, as if there were no elected representatives of the people.

Professor Roscoe Pound likewise referred to the need for "a living constitution by judicial interpretation," in order to "respond to the vital needs of present-day life." He rejected the idea of law as "a body of rules."

But if law is not a body of rules, what is it? A set of arbitrary fiats by judges, imposing their own vision of "the needs of the times"? Or a set of arbitrary regulations stealthily emerging from within the bowels of a bureaucracy?

Louis Brandeis was another leader of this Progressive era chorus of demands for moving beyond law as rules. He cited "newly arisen social needs" and "a shifting of our longing from legal justice to social justice."

In other words, judges were encouraged to do an end run around rules, such as those set forth in the Constitution, and around the elected representatives of "we the people." As Roscoe Pound put it, law should be "in the hands of a progressive and enlightened caste whose conceptions are in advance of the public."

That is still the vision of the left a hundred years later. The Constitution cannot protect us unless we protect the Constitution, by voting out those who promote end runs around it.

FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO INFLUENTIAL NEWSLETTER  -  Every weekday publishes what many in the media and Washington consider "must-reading". HUNDREDS of columnists and cartoonists regularly appear. Sign up for the daily update. It's free. Just click here.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

George Soros and His Evil Empire


Exposing the real power behind the radical transformation of America

To conservatives, he’s the evil emperor in “Star Wars” – the Empire’s shadowy and malevolent puppet-master, the real power behind the widespread subversion and destruction of freedom, prosperity and hope.

But to hundreds of organizations on the political and moral left, he is literally their lifeblood, a revered leader, a godfather – almost a god, who provides good things for his children.

Now, in a stunning exposé, the December issue of Whistleblower shines a thousand-watt spotlight on the “dark lord” of the left – billionaire investor George Soros.

“GEORGE SOROS AND HIS EVIL EMPIRE” illuminates the heart and soul of this mysterious leftwing transformer of societies. It reveals how he creates and financially sustains scores of influential and shockingly anti-American organizations – all dedicated to converting America into a European-style, government-controlled, socialist state.

“Soros, like Obama, is wired very differently than most of us,” says WND Managing Editor David Kupelian. “He rejects and reviles most things decent Americans regard as good and sacred, and he tends to favor everything rotten: He wants to legalize drugs. He supports euthanasia. He’s for socialism and opposes free-market capitalism. He’s for devaluing America’s currency, telling the Financial Times last year ‘an orderly decline of the dollar is actually desirable.’ He supports the destruction of American sovereignty in favor of global governance. He detests conservative talk radio, Fox News and WorldNetDaily, and funds organizations that constantly attack the only free press America currently has.”

In short, says Kupelian, “if it’s immoral, subversive or harmful to America, Soros favors it, organizes it and funds it. If it’s noble and freedom-producing, like free markets and small government, he despises it and creates organizations to undermine and ultimately destroy it. This issue of Whistleblower shines intense daylight on all of this.”

Highlights of “GEORGE SOROS AND HIS EVIL EMPIRE” include:

  • “George Soros bets against America” by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., on how Soros attacks capitalism and makes billions on a global recession
  • “The emperor” by David Kupelian, describing the kind of person that can profit personally at the expense of entire nations
  • “The most dangerous man in the world?” by Joseph Farah, who ranks Soros above Obama and other likely “candidates”
  • “Soros: This is ‘when my character was made’” by Art Moore, who takes readers back to the Jewish billionaire investor’s chilling Nazi-occupation drama during his teen years
  • “MAN OF 1,000 FACES: Organizations directly funded by Soros and his Open Society Institute” – a comprehensive list and description of over 150 groups, each more subversive than the last, all financed by Soros
  • “How the leftwing money machine works” by Art Moore, on how the secretive Tides network “launders” donations to radical causes
  • “Rush Limbaugh: Soros is promoting widespread voter fraud”
  • “Progressives won midterms, claims Soros-funded group,” which now calls on Obama to govern via executive order and ignore Congress to push his radical agenda, by Aaron Klein
  • “Soros’ scheme for ‘elite’ judiciary” by Bob Unruh, on Soros’ “highly coordinated, well-funded” campaign to “exclude conservative, rule-of-law judges”
  • “Documentary embraces leftwing terrorists” by Matthew Vadum, revealing Soros’ heavy involvement in underwriting and screening subversive, anti-American films
  • “Group wants feds to probe talk radio” by Aaron Klein, on rising leftwing complaints cable-news networks are engaged in “hate speech”
  • “All the news that fits Soros’s agenda” by Ed Lasky, on how three leftist billionaires conspire to control the future of journalism
  • “Soros, healthcare rationing and the ‘Death Project’” by Jerome R. Corsi, on why Soros is such a big supporter of medical rationing
  • “The problem of the radical non-Jewish Jew” by Dennis Prager, on why George Soros works so hard to undermine his own people

“Soros,” says WND founder and Editor Joseph Farah, “is an America hater. There’s no other way to put it. He recently said only America stands in the way of globalist progress and he’s going to do everything in his power to bring America to its knees.”

Farah adds: “Most of all, I am outraged by Soros’ attempt to buy elections.”

“Make no mistake,” concludes Kupelian. “George Soros’ goal is nothing less than to overthrow the United States of America and its Constitution. Fortunately, armed with the kind of information and insight in this issue of Whistleblower, there’s real hope we can engage and defeat the forces of the atheistic left which, for some strange and ungodly reason, always seem to be offended by everything good.”

For the holidays WMD is running a special: 

SPECIAL CHRISTMAS OFFER: For a limited time, subscribe to Whistleblower, renew your subscription or give a gift subscription for one year and you’ll get $10 off (pay $39.95 instead of the usual $49.95), plus you’ll receive two free gifts: First, you’ll get the acclaimed new DVD documentary, “Cultural Marxism.”

Go to :

If you wish to order by phone, call our toll-free order line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).

Soros Bets on U.S. Financial Collapse

Media Matters recently received $1 million from Soros so that it could try to mute the effectiveness of conservative media organizations and personalities, some of them critical of Soros.

Another financial expert is expressing his deep disgust with the Federal Reserve’s decision toprint more money and buy more U.S. debt, saying it is a sign that the U.S. capitalist system is moving closer to collapse.

“This is the type of stuff we accused the communist and socialist governments of doing—interfering in free markets through currency manipulation,” declared Zubi Diamond, author ofThe Wizards of Wall Street. “What the Fed is doing is not good for free market capitalism and it is not good for America.”

In an interview with Accuracy in Media, Diamond went on to say, “The Fed is following the economic models of Third World countries by printing more money and devaluing their currencies. If you keep doing what Third World economies do, eventually you will become a Third World economy.”

The Fed’s new action, labeled “quantitative easing” or QE2, follows a first attempt at “QE,” known as QE1. QE means that the Federal Reserve is printing more money and buying more government debt. In total, according to Investor’s Business Daily, “the Fed will have created $2.5 trillion out of the blue.”

Diamond said the result of the Fed’s policy will be to “increase the debt, devalue our currency and create a bigger problem that won’t solve the crisis.” Eventually, America could “collapse under its own weight of massive debt,” he warned.

The QE2 “will devalue the dollar and lead to higher commodity prices, asset and price inflation. It may even lead to the end of the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency,” Diamond predicted. He noted that Obama Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner floated the idea of the dollar losing its status as the world’s reserve currency, “only to backpedal from it when it raised some eyebrows.”

“What is most troubling to me about this,” Diamond added, “is that the Fed’s QE2 is in alignment with George Soros’s agenda to destroy global capitalism.” The decline of the dollar “is what George Soros wants and what he has proposed in the past,” he noted.

Soros, the billionaire hedge fund operator who finances various leftist and Marxist groups, including Media Matters, has made his fortune by betting on the collapse of national economies and currencies. He was convicted of insider trading in France.

Media Matters recently received $1 million from Soros so that it could try to mute the effectiveness of conservative media organizations and personalities, some of them critical of Soros.

In recent Fox News programs, Glenn Beck has been focusing on the decline of the dollar and how Soros has proclaimed that “an orderly decline of the dollar is actually desirable.” Programs like these have made Beck into a toptarget of Media Matters.

AIM has been warning for years about the intentions of Soros, noting in a 2004 report that he “specializes in weakening or collapsing the currencies of entire nations for his own selfish interests.”

We noted, “Despite his vision of an ‘open society,’ he operates an unregulated ‘hedge fund,’ open only to the super-rich.” His Soros Fund Management is a member of the “founder’s council” of the Managed Funds Association (MFA).

Diamond said that as Soros is betting on a U.S. financial collapse, his net worth and the amount of money under the management of his hedge fund have ballooned. The money that Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is putting into the economy, Diamond said, is designed to “replace the stolen money from American families and the capitalist corporations” under the cover of the financial crisis.

The collapse of capitalism will be “a big pay day for George Soros and members of the Managed Funds Association,” he said. “They are betting against the dollar and moving assets to gold and to the emerging economies. They are betting against U.S. survival as a capitalist nation.”

Referring to the members of the MFA who are betting against the U.S., Diamond asked: “Have you heard them say they want to restore capitalism? No. But you will hear them talk about the ‘new normal’—meaning that we are not going back to capitalism. And this is by design.”

Diamond’s criticism follows the shocking statements of Charles Ortel, managing director of Newport Value Partners,who told AIM that the Federal Reserve plan to buy $600 billion of U.S. Government securities “borders on the criminal” because the impact will be the devaluation of the dollar by 20 percent and the destruction of $10 trillion of household net worth.

Ortel told AIM that the Obama Administration’s “war on capitalism” has become a “war on wealth” under the direction of Fed chairman Ben S. Bernanke.

Republican Rep. Tom Price and Senator-elect Rand Paul have led the criticism of the Federal Reserve, with Paul saying, “With so much blame going around for the current financial crisis it is surprising that so few in the mainstream press have discussed the role of the Federal Reserve System.”

As if to prove the point, the Sunday TV interview shows featured lengthy discussions about proposed budget cuts and federal spending but no detailed examination of the actions of the Federal Reserve.

Charles Ortel had told AIM that the result of the upheaval will be a new “global regulatory regime” to manage the U.S. and other economies. In this regard, talk of global taxes by the United Nations has increased recently and Obama himself endorsed the concept in a document adopted by the September 20-22 U.N. Summit on the Millennium Development Goals.

Senator David Vitter’s Senate resolution 461 would put the Senate on record against any global tax scheme.

Like Ortel, Diamond notes that previous attempts to “save” the economy through the actions of the Federal Reserve have demonstrably failed. Rather than allow the Fed to pour more printed money into the economy, Diamond said that the new Congress should be “following the money paper trail and try to recover as much of the stolen money as possible.” Instead of holding the looters accountable, he said that the Fed is allowing the looters to digest the stolen money and dig us deeper into the hole.”

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), he said, should reinstate regulations designed to protect invested capital from the hedge fund short-sellers. “What is needed is the legal protection for the invested capital, protection for the value of our homes and policies that encourage capitalism and risk taking,” he said. The hedge fund short-sellers should be monitored and regulated like mutual funds, he said.

While Bernanke takes the brunt of Diamond’s critique, Diamond doesn’t lose sight of the President who re-appointed Bernanke to that post.

“President Barack Obama is doing everything he is not supposed to do—and is failing to do the things he is supposed to do—to fix this economic crisis,” he said.

Consider the matter of “stimulus” spending, for example. “Obama got $700 billion in stimulus money, supposedly for shovel ready jobs. But he later admitted there were no shovel ready jobs. So it is just more money down the drain, more debt and deficit, digging us deeper into the hole,” he said.

He concluded, “This is the person the pundits and talking heads on TV insisted is smart and intelligent. Misguided Americans may have inadvertently elected a dummy or an enemy agent as their President. Take your pick.”

BY CLIFF KINCAID ON NOVEMBER 8TH, 2010  - Posted at Back to Basics

The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party

Monday, December 27, 2010

Obama Embraces 'Death Panel' Concept in Medicare Rule

Sunday, 26 Dec 2010 06:41 PM

During the stormy debate over his healthcare plan, President Barack Obama promised his program would not "pull the plug on grandma" and Congress dropped plans for death panels and "end of life" counseling that would encourage aged patients from partaking in costly medical procedures.

Opponents of Obama's plan, including former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, dubbed such efforts as "death panels" that would encourage euthanasia.

But on December 3rd, the Obama administration seemingly flouted the will of Congress by issuing a new Medicare regulation detailing -- "voluntary advance care planning" that is to be included during patients' annual checkups. The regulation aimed at the aged "may include advance directives to forgo aggressive life-sustaining treatment," The New York Times reported.

death,panel,obama,palin,medicare,ruleThe new provision goes into effect Jan. 1, 2011 and allows Medicare to pay for voluntary counseling to help beneficiaries deal with the complex and decisions families face when a loved one is approaching death. Critics say it is another attempt to limit healthcare options for the elderly as they face serious illness.

Incoming House Speaker John Boehner said during the healthcare debate that, “This provision may start us down a treacherous path toward government-encouraged euthanasia.”

Specifically, the measure was known as Section 1233 of the bill passed by the House in November 2009. It was not included in the final legislation, however. It allowed Medicare to pay for consultations about advance care planning every five years. In contrast, the new rule allows annual discussions as part of the wellness visit.

Elizabeth D. Wickham, executive director of LifeTree, a pro-life Christian educational ministry, told the Times was concerned that end-of-life counseling would encourage patients to forgo or curtail care, thus hastening death.

“The infamous Section 1233 is still alive and kicking,” Ms. Wickham said. “Patients will lose the ability to control treatments at the end of life.”

The rule was issued by Dr. Donald M. Berwick, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, according to The New York Times. He is a longtime advocate for rationing medical procedures for the elderly.

Before being tapped by Obama to his Medicare post, Berwick had long applauded Britain's National Health Service, which uses an algorithm to determine if the aged are worthy of additional expenditure for medical care and advanced treatments.

Berwick has argued that rationing will have to eventually be implemented in the U.S, stating, “The decision is not whether or not we will ration care. The decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.”

Seniors appear to be a major target for precious resources under the Obama healthcare plan. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Obama plan cuts nearly $500 million in Medicare benefits to seniors as the federal government adds 30 million uninsured Americans to private and public health care systems.

The cost of caring for the elderly has not been lost on Berwick.
“The chronically ill and those towards the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill out here… there is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place,” he said.

During the heated healthcare debate, supporters of the Obama vigorously denied rationing for seniors would take place and scoffed at "death panel" critics like Palin.

Last month, however, economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman told ABC News that rising Medicare costs could only be dealt with by "death panels and sales taxes."

He added: "Medicare is going to have to decide what it's going to pay for. And at least for starters, it's going to have to decide which medical procedures are not effective at all and should not be paid for at all. In other words, it should have endorsed the [death] panel that was part of the healthcare reform.’"

Read more: Obama Embraces 'Death Panel' Concept in Medicare Rule

The NY Times Concedes Governor Palin “Forced [Obama] Onto the Defensive.”

The NY Times concedes that Governor Palin put Obama “onto the defensive” with “death panels” (emphasis added):

Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice-presidential candidate, and Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader, led the criticism in the summer of 2009. Ms. Palin said “Obama’s death panel” would decide who was worthy of health care. Mr. Boehner, who is in line to become speaker, said, “This provision may start us down a treacherous path toward government-encouraged euthanasia.” Forced onto the defensive, Mr. Obama said that nothing in the bill would “pull the plug on grandma.”

Has any other potential Republican presidential candidate other than Palin been able to force the New York Times to concede that he or she put Obama on the defensive? Has any other potential Republican presidential candidate other than Palin destroyed a liberal policy to such an extent that the Democrat Party is afraid to publicize what it is doing and can only get it implemented through channels outside of the legislative arena?

“Death Panels” Regulation Begins Obama’s Rule by Fiat

by Ben Johnson – Posted at

In a foretaste of outrages to come, the Obama administration managed to sneak out a federal regulation paying doctors to provide “end of life counseling” to those covered by ObamaCare. The Medicare rule, which Congress never voted on, may encourage thousands to forego lifesaving treatment. This move is a voluntary precursor to the inevitable rationing engendered by socialized medicine. Many conservative media outlets have objected to the pro-death aspects of this decision. However, they have ignored a vital aspect of this story: the way he implemented the policy. This federal regulation inaugurates Obama’s two-year strategy to rule by executive order. The New York Times reports:

When a proposal to encourage end-of-life planning touched off a political storm over “death panels,” Democrats dropped it from legislation to overhaul the health care system. But the Obama administration will achieve the same goal by regulation, starting Jan. 1.

Under the new policy, outlined in a Medicare regulation, the government will pay doctors who advise patients on options for end-of-life care, which may include advance directives to forgo aggressive life-sustaining treatment.

Although the NYT just discovered this, Steven Ertelt at reported the regulation nearly a month ago. (We covered it at the time.) For once, the Times included some salient facts along with its whitewash of the administration’s activities.

This program will be overseen by the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Dr. Donald Berwick, a fanatical believer in limiting (read: denying) care. The paper quotes Berwick as saying, “Using unwanted procedures in terminal illness is a form of assault. In economic terms, it is waste.” Berwick added advanced directives were one of “several techniques” that led “to both lower cost and more humane care.” There is no question they lead to lower costs, in addition to providing an economic stimulus to tombstone carvers, morticians, and cemetery plot salesmen.

The Times reports the regulation was pushed by two Congressional Democrats: Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon and Sen. Jay Rockefeller IV of West Virginia. This backing unintentionally reveals the measure’s greater significance: The liberals could not ram a death panels provision through even the Democratic-controlled 111th Congress, so Obama is imposing it with the stroke of a pen, without a single vote. The New York Times admits this is the wave of the future:

While the new law does not mention advance care planning, the Obama administration has been able to achieve its policy goal through the regulation-writing process, a strategy that could become more prevalent in the next two years as the president deals with a strengthened Republican opposition in Congress.

This author first exposed Obama’s plan to rule by executive order, in October. The following month, the Center for American Progress released a lengthy report compiled by Sarah Rosen Wartell calling for the president to implement a “progressive” agenda by fiat over the next two years. In its foreword, CAP president and CEO John Podesta called on Obama to rule through:

• Executive orders
• Rulemaking
• Agency management
• Convening and creating public-private partnerships
• Commanding the armed forces
• Diplomacy

Just last week, the inside-the-Beltway Bible Politico featured an article by John F. Harris and James Hohmann which concluded, “Republican gains in Congress make it essential for [Obama] to use new avenues of power,” including regulations and executive orders.

The Left is irresistibly drawn to collecting as much unbridled power as possible, because its agenda is so unpopular it could never receive sufficient popular support to pass an election. Since the November election, Obama, Reid, and company have followed the authoritarian path I predicted. I wrote in November, “Look for an aggressive agenda in the lame duck session of Congress, focused especially on passing the DREAM Act and repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’” Harry Reid unleashed precisely these two measures (and passed one of them) in his lame duck power grab, cramming in a bid to pass a $1.27 trillion budget besides. Next, I wrote, “After January, Cabinet agencies will issue regulations at a faster clip.” This follows that prediction. Finally, I wrote, “Obama will rule increasingly through executive orders and appeals to the United Nations.” If this regulation means anything, it means we have not seen anything yet.

How fitting one of the first expressions of Obama’s new strategy was a measure to let people die. He seems to have the same fate planned for the U.S. Constitution.

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Thought for the Day Christmas Day 2010 – The American Christmas Meal and Remembering our Troops~

Typical American Christmas  Meal

perfect turkey

The most common items eaten for American Christmas Dinner are:

Turkey + Stuffing
Cranberry Sauce
Green Beans (Most popular style is green bean casserole.)
Mashed Potatoes (Sweet Potatoes or both were a close second!)
Gravy made from the turkey drippings/giblets.
CORN! This is what sets US Christmas dinners from all others around the world.
A few different types of pie and rolls.

The Original Military Christmas Poem

Merry Christmas, My Friend

By James M. Schmidt, a Marine Lance Corporal
stationed in Washington, D.C., in 1986

Twas the night before Christmas, he lived all alone,
In a one bedroom house made of plaster & stone.

I had come down the chimney, with presents to give
and to see just who in this home did live

As I looked all about, a strange sight I did see,
no tinsel, no presents, not even a tree.
No stocking by the fire, just boots filled with sand.
On the wall hung pictures of a far distant land.

With medals and badges, awards of all kind,
a sobering thought soon came to my mind.
For this house was different, unlike any I'd seen.
This was the home of a U.S. Marine.

I'd heard stories about them, I had to see more,
so I walked down the hall and pushed open the door.
And there he lay sleeping, silent, alone,
Curled up on the floor in his one-bedroom home.

He seemed so gentle, his face so serene,
Not how I pictured a U.S. Marine.
Was this the hero, of whom I’d just read?
Curled up in his poncho, a floor for his bed?

His head was clean-shaven, his weathered face tan.
I soon understood, this was more than a man.
For I realized the families that I saw that night,
owed their lives to these men, who were willing to fight.

Soon around the Nation, the children would play,
And grown-ups would celebrate on a bright Christmas day.
They all enjoyed freedom, each month and all year,
because of Marines like this one lying here.

I couldn’t help wonder how many lay alone,
on a cold Christmas Eve, in a land far from home.
Just the very thought brought a tear to my eye.
I dropped to my knees and I started to cry.

He must have awoken, for I heard a rough voice,
"Santa, don't cry, this life is my choice
I fight for freedom, I don't ask for more.
My life is my God, my country, my Corps."

With that he rolled over, drifted off into sleep,
I couldn't control it, I continued to weep.

I watched him for hours, so silent and still.
I noticed he shivered from the cold night's chill.
So I took off my jacket, the one made of red,
and covered this Marine from his toes to his head.

Then I put on his T-shirt of scarlet and gold,
with an eagle, globe and anchor emblazoned so bold.
And although it barely fit me, I began to swell with pride,
and for one shining moment, I was Marine Corps deep inside.

I didn't want to leave him so quiet in the night,
this guardian of honor so willing to fight.
But half asleep he rolled over, and in a voice clean and pure,
said "Carry on, Santa, it's Christmas Day, all secure."

One look at my watch and I knew he was right,
Merry Christmas my friend, Semper Fi and goodnight

Tell our troops: "Even if you can't make it home for the holidays, you'll be at home in our hearts," by making a special contribution to the USO today.

Camouflage and Christmas Lights

Video:  Camouflage and Christmas Lights

Joy to the World

Classic Christmas Movies

Christmas with Norman Rockwell

Norman Rockwell's Christmas Book: Revised and Updated


Merry Christmas! : Celebrating America's Greatest Holiday

A Century of Christmas Memories, 1900-1999 (Keepsake)

Feds sneaking around Congress to regulate firearms

Originally Posted: December 23, 2010 -  9:15 pm Eastern  © 2010

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, or ATF, has a long history of excess and overreaching … and they're at it again.

Using exaggerated reports of gun smuggling from the U.S. into Mexico as their justification, the agency has filed for an emergency regulation requiring gun dealers to keep track of their customers and file special reports to ATF whenever a customer purchases more than one semi-automatic rifle within any 5-day period. Such special reporting is already required for multiple sales of handguns and has proven to be thoroughly useless as a law enforcement tool.

ATF's requested regulation – which is unconstitutional, violates a statutory prohibition against firearms registration schemes and was obviously filed as an "emergency" simply as a means of bypassing Congress – would be "temporary," meaning that it would have to be renewed in four or five months, and is said to only apply to gun dealers in states bordering Mexico, though the regulation, as submitted, seems to be missing that specific limitation.

At this point the proposed regulation is awaiting approval from the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Political observers will recall that OIRA is headed by President Obama's old friend Cass Sunstein, who famously advocated for the abolition of all hunting and for the extension of legal rights – including the right to have a court-appointed attorney – to animals.

While Mr. Sunstein is an attorney and college professor specializing, in part, in constitutional law, his record shows that his Constitution does not include the Second Amendment. It is expected that Sunstein's office will approve ATF's Emergency Regulation by the first week of January unless there is immediate and vehement objection from members of Congress and the public.

In the late '70s, shortly after my late father, Neal Knox, took over the NRA's lobbying efforts, ATF leaders attempted to expand their power by implementing a regulatory scheme requiring that gun manufacturers add a government-defined 13-digit serial number to every gun and that dealers report detailed information, including that new serial number, to ATF for every sale. Records of those sales, guns, and purchasers were to be stored in ATF computers. It was gun registration, pure and simple. The scheme might have slipped through had it not been for the heightened visibility of ATF due to Dad's efforts and his immediate sounding of the alarm when the proposal was introduced.

Congress had upon numerous occasions debated the idea of a federal gun registration law and had rejected the idea on each occasion. For ATF to decide to bypass Congress and implement such a registration scheme via regulation was rightly perceived as an affront by many members of Congress, and their indignant response was to remove some four million dollars from the agency's operating budget (the amount ATF said they expected to spend on the scheme.)

That overreach, along with egregious abuses of honest gun dealers by the ATF led to the introduction of the McClure-Volkmer Firearms Owners Protection Act to repeal some of the more onerous and confusing sections of the Gun Control Act of 1968.

It is to be hoped that current members of Congress will have a similarly indignant response to ATF's overreaching in this instance, as here again the agency is trying to implement by regulation something which the Congress has considered and rejected in the past.

Rights opponents will argue that rights activists like me are overly sensitive and unyielding in our positions and that we reactively oppose any firearms regulations regardless of how benign or effective they may be. There will be an inclination to accept ideas like this and then place the burden of proof upon rights advocates to explain why it's a bad idea.

Really, the burden of proof belongs to those who wish to interfere with our rights. It is up to ATF to show the legal authority to institute this proposed regulation and that it does not violate the spirit or intent of any existing law. It is also up to the ATF to show that their proposed regulation will be effective and productive as a means of fighting illegal gun trafficking.

The fact is that ATF can present no such evidence in support of their idea, just the suggestion that the proposal sounds reasonable and might be of use. That's not good enough.

It is overreaching for an agency to follow after Congress and enact regulations where Congress has refused to enact laws, especially where Congress considered and discarded those exact actions.

It is extra-legal for an agency to ignore statutory limitations barring the collection or archiving of information about gun purchasers, not to mention limitations under the Paperwork Reduction Act forbidding unnecessary increases in paperwork burdens.

The multiple-sales reporting scheme claims to be aimed at keeping guns out of Mexico, but it fails on that point as well.

First, it will have little effect on gun smuggling in Mexico, for smugglers familiarize themselves with the laws they are breaking. They will easily avoid ensnaring themselves in such an obvious trap.

Second, while the actual number of guns that arrive in Mexico from the USA is impossible to determine, we know that the number being reported is inflated since the ATF only traces those guns selected by the Mexican authorities. There is strong evidence that American civilian gun shops are only one of many sources of guns in Mexico, and a minor one at that. Pictures of confiscated arms in the Mexican press routinely include grenades, rocket launchers and heavy machine guns, arms that aren't in the U.S. civilian inventory.

Finally, the proposed multiple-sale scheme places a significant burden on dealers and puts them at increased risk of prosecution for clerical errors if they fail to detect a repeat buyer in a timely fashion.

You can tell the ATF and Congress that you oppose the ATF's overreach through any − or all − of the following ways:

  1. Call the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulation Affairs, Department of Justice, desk officer at (202) 395-6466
  2. E-mail Barbara A. Terrell, ATF, Firearms Industry Programs Branch at
  3. Call your senators and representative through the United States Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121

There is no such thing as reasonable infringement on liberty.

Jeff Knox is a second-generation political activist and director of The Firearms Coalition. His writing can regularly be seen in Shotgun News and Front Sight magazines as well as here on WorldNetDaily.

Is there anyone else out there that just finds the timing on this and the shooting in Arizona by a left-wing nut job, just little too convenient??

· Something very, very, very strange!!  -  Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:04:14 PM · by djf · 49 replies

Here is Gabrielle Giffords YouTube channel: Scroll all the way to the bottom of the page, and look on the left under Subscriptions (2) See Classitup10??? Guess who that is!!! As I said on another thread, this whole deal reeks of weird mind control MK-Ultra black-ops stuff... Are the hairs on the back of anybody’s necks standing up yet???

Watch the Other Hand – Chaos Being Pushed on the Left and the Right – Part l

Watch the Other Hand – part ii:  Dems, Media Blame Tea Party, Palin for Shooting; Yet Shooter Linked to Left-Wing Politics

· Unbelievable: Democrat Group Using Gifford’s Shooting For Fundraiser!

An extreme, left-wing Democrat group calling itself 21st Century Democrats has had the gall to send out an email blast using as a fundraising tool Saturday’s criminal shooting of Representative Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona. Judge John Roll and four others were killed in the incident, one of them a 9-year-old girl, but these Democrats are ignorant enough to be using this incident to try and squeeze donations from its supporters. Some might think the action of 21st Century Democrats is itself a crime — a crime against decency.The email blast sent out Sunday morning to its supporters tells members...

Friday, December 24, 2010

Ronald Reagan Christmas Address (video) and More…

Video: Ronald Reagan’s Christmas Address as delivered to the nation December 23, 1981 -  29 years ago this week:

"Like the National Christmas Tree, our nation is a living,
growing thing -
planted in rich American soil.
Only our devoted care can bring it to full flower..."

In a world of political correctness and Christmas culture wars, Reagan's national address is almost unbelievable! It is a breath of fresh Christmas air! What happened to the politicians like him who are not afraid to hold fast to the Christian faith despite what others think or say?  No wonder almost everyone loved him, even if they didn’t agree with his politics.  Ronald Reagan inspired people in a positive way!!

President Ronald Reagan’s Christmas Address 12/23/81

Video:  Ronald Reagan Christmas Address (12/23/81)

Camouflage and Christmas Lights

Video:  Camouflage and Christmas Lights

As America Celebrates Christmas, Rev. Franklin Graham Says Secular 'War' Rages Against Christians

By David A. Patten and Kathleen Walter

As Americans gather with their families to celebrate Christmas, the Rev. Franklin Graham decries the continuing cultural “war” against Christ and his believers.

The campaign against Christianity rages “not just in America, but in many countries around the world,” the noted evangelist and son of world-renowned preacher Billy Graham declares during an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV.

Also during his Christmas message to America via Newsmax, Graham reveals that his inspirational father fully intends to return to the pulpit. The last time the elder Graham preached was in July 2006, during a revival at Baltimore’s Camden Yards. But Franklin says his father’s joy during the Christmas season remains undiminished.

“My father loves Christmas because we’re celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ, and my father, his entire life has been about sharing this wonderful message of God’s love for the world,” he says

To Read rest of article and video Click Here: As America Celebrates Christmas, Rev. Franklin Graham Says Secular 'War' Rages Against Christians

From 1879, Christmas Wild Game Recipes

Merry Christmas, God Bless America and Support our Troops!!!