Video: Hollywood Hypocrites - Producer Vows To Destroy National Rifle Assoc - Sen Ted Cruz On The Record
Watch Ted Cruz’s Takedown of Big-Time Hollywood Producer Behind Upcoming Anti-NRA Movie
Showing posts with label Greta Van Susteren. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greta Van Susteren. Show all posts
Saturday, January 18, 2014
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Thoughts on Syria… From All Sides
This Is About Destroying Sovereignty’: Beck Examines Potential Syria Strike Through the Eyes of a ‘Radical Leftist’
Many have been alarmed by the rapid escalation in Syria this week after years of horrific violence. With the reported use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime, U.S. officials say America could begin missile strikes within the week.
But why now? What exactly do we hope to achieve?
(Photo: TheBlaze TV)
Glenn Beck tackled the issue on his television program Wednesday evening, arguing that the focus of the administration may not be on the war itself — but on the subsequent layout of the world.
“This administration knows that we are on the brink of World War III. The global economy is fragile, global stability is weak, the west is on the edge, it’s only a matter of time before it crumbles,” he said. “Iran will eventually lose any remaining restraint and go after Israel, Syria starts spilling across the border… When it all falls apart and the west is so weakened, who puts it all back together again?”
“War is — after a long period of just running things into the ground — war makes the people of the world forget what the world was like before the war,” Beck continued. “Beyond that, history shows us that war also changes all the players. It changes borders, it changes everything…”
He speculated that after a period of violence, we will “gather at the U.N. because we have to stop an international crisis, and everything is teetering on the edge, and people will cry out, ‘stop the madness!’ And so we do, the international way.”
If we’re not listening to China now, Beck said he guarantees we’ll listen to them at the bargaining table, and we’ll concede. If they say, for instance, we’ll forgive your debts if you just sign the U.N. Arms Treaty, we will.
“This is about destroying sovereignty,” Beck asserted. “The United Nations will, in the end, broker the deal, making them the new superpower and making us just one of the guys. That’s what everybody wants, for the United States just to be average, just like everybody else…”
Considering alternate explanations, Beck said he can think of “a million reasons” why we shouldn’t intervene, “and not one why we should.”
Intervention, he said, will further destabilize Syria, further destabilize the region, and will likely impact our gas prices and the stock market.
If we are intervening purely for humanitarian purposes, why didn’t we intervene sooner? Why don’t we intervene in other cases of mass slaughter? And if the tipping point is truly chemical weapons, Beck asked if you trust the intelligence community more or less than the last time they claimed there were weapons of mass destruction?
Remember the guy who cut his enemy’s heart out and ate it, Beck added? “We’re on his side now.”
The list goes on, Beck said, including the financial cost of the endeavor and the possibility of dragging us into another war we don’t have the energy or resources for.
“Syria is not about teaching Assad a lesson. Two days of bombing probably won’t even seem out of place in Syria today, unfortunately,” he concluded. “Syria is not a response to the shock and horror of murder — hundreds of thousands have died… Syria is this — it is a sick opportunity for the globalist progressive revolutionaries in our own administration and all around the globe to remold the world closer to their heart’s desire.”
Beck - Syria Intervention
8/28/13 - Glenn Beck says the threat of military action against Syria is part of a plot by global progressives to allow the UN to establish peace and avert WWIII and create a One World Government.
Video: George Galloway Explosive Speech British Parliament Debate On Military Action Against Syria
August 29, 2013 - George Galloway Explosive Speech British Parliament Debate On Military Action Against Syria
'Me And My Big Mouth' - UK's Cameron Backs Off From Syria Attack
The French Bow Out Of Syria Strike
And Russia Calls For Urgent UN Security Council Meeting
Some more from BBG:
- RUSSIA CALLED FOR THE SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING, DIPLOMAT
- 5 PERMANENT COUNCIL MEMBERS U.K., U.S., FRANCE, CHINA, RUSSIA
- FIVE PERM. SEC. COUNCIL MEMBERS TO MEET AT 2:30P
Hopefully Putin doesn't whip out incontrovertible proof the chemical gas attack was linked to Al Qaeda, Qatar... and the US of course.
Two Minds on Syria
The New Yorker: So it looks like we’re going to bomb Assad.
Good.
Really? Why good?
Did you see the videos of those kids? I heard that ten thousand people were gassed. Hundreds of them died. This time, we have to do something.
Yes, I saw the videos.
And you don’t want to pound the shit out of him?
I want to pound the shit out of him.
But you think we shouldn’t do anything.
I didn’t say that. But I want you to explain what we’re going to achieve by bombing.
We’re going to let Assad know that chemical weapons are over the line. There’s a reason they’ve been illegal since Verdun or whenever.
Except when Saddam used them against the Kurds—we knew, and we didn’t say a word.
Is that a reason to let Assad use them against his people?
At this point, I don’t think Assad is too worried about the Geneva Conventions.
He should have to think hard before using them again.
He’s a bloody dictator fighting for survival. He’s going to do whatever he has to do.
Not if we really hurt him. Not if we pound his communications centers, his air-force bases, key government installations. He’ll be more likely to survive if he doesn’t use chemical weapons.
Killing civilians while we’re at it.
These would be very specific targets.
The wrong people always get killed.
Maybe. Probably. But if you were a Syrian being bombed by Assad every day, trying to keep your head down and your family alive, wouldn’t you want the world to respond, even if a few more people die? I think so.
Easy for you to say.
Hey, can we not personalize this?
Weren’t you just saying that I don’t care about dying children? (Pause.) So you want us to get involved in their civil war.
I’m not saying that.
But that’s what we’ll be doing. Intervening on the rebel side, tipping the balance in their favor.
Not necessarily. We’ll be drawing a line that says dictators don’t get to use W.M.D.s without consequences.
You can’t bomb targets on one side of a civil war without helping the other side.
It would be very temporary. We’d send Assad a clear message, and then we’d step back and let them go on fighting. We’re not getting involved any deeper than that, because I know what you’re going to say—
The rebels are a bunch of infighting, disorganized, jihadist thugs, and we can’t trust any of them.
I’m not saying we should.
And what do we do if Assad retaliates against Israel or Turkey? Or if he uses nerve gas somewhere else?
We hit him again.
And it escalates.
Not if we restrict it to cruise missiles and air strikes.
Now you’re scaring me. Have you forgotten Iraq?
Not for a single minute.
My point is that you can’t restrict it. You can’t use force for limited goals. You need to know what you’ll do after his next move, and the move after that.
It only escalates if we allow ourselves to get dragged in deeper. Kosovo didn’t escalate.
This isn’t Kosovo. The Syrian rebels aren’t the K.L.A. Assad isn’t Milosevic. Putin isn’t Yeltsin. This is far worse. Kosovo became a U.N. protectorate. That’s not going to happen in Syria.
You think Putin is going to risk a military confrontation with the U.S. and Europe?
I think Russia isn’t going to let Assad go down. Neither is Iran or Hezbollah. So they’ll escalate. This could be the thing that triggers an Israel-Iran war, and how do we stay out of that? My God, it feels like August, 1914.
That was a hundred years ago. Stop with the historical analogies.
You’re the one who brought up Verdun. And Kosovo.
I brought up Kosovo because you brought up Iraq. That’s the problem with these arguments. Iraq! Vietnam! Valley Forge! Agincourt! People resort to analogies so they don’t have to think about the matter at hand.
And because they don’t know anything about the matter at hand.
I know what I saw in those videos.
Thank God Obama doesn’t make foreign policy that way. He knows what he doesn’t know about Syria. He’s always thinking a few steps ahead. He’s not going to get steamrolled by John McCain and Anderson Cooper.
At a certain point, caution is another word for indecisiveness. Obama looks weak! Or worse—indifferent. Anyway, he should have thought ahead when he called chemical weapons a “red line.” He set that trap a year ago, and now we’re in it.
Why does it have to be a trap?
Because our credibility is on the line.
Thank you, Dr. Kissinger.
See, that’s another thing people do in these arguments.
What?
“You sound like so-and-so.” It shouldn’t matter who else is on your side. I mean, you’re in bed with Rand Paul. Anyway, credibility matters even if Kissinger said so. You have to do what you say you’re going to do, especially with bullies.
I don’t think Obama committed himself to any one course of action. But if he does bomb them, we’re involved in that war, and I sure hope his advisers have thought through all the potential consequences better than you have.
Inaction has consequences, too. Assad gases more people, the death toll hits two hundred thousand, the weapons get into Hezbollah’s hands, Iran moves ahead with its nuclear program, the Syrian rebels disintegrate and turn to international terrorism, the whole region goes up in sectarian flames.
And how does firing cruise missiles at Damascus prevent any of this?
It doesn’t. But, look, all of this is already happening with us sitting it out. If we put a gun to Assad’s head, we might be able to have more influence over the outcome. At least we can prevent him from winning.
A violent stalemate. How wonderful for the Syrians. Some people think that’s the best solution for us.
I’m not saying that.
What are you saying?
I don’t know. I had it worked out in my head until we started talking. (Pause.) But we need to do something this time.
Not just to do something.
All right. Not just to do something. But could you do me a favor?
What’s that?
While you’re doing nothing, could you please be unhappy about it?
I am.
___
Above: photo authenticated based on its contents and other A.P. reporting, Syrians inspect buildings damaged by heavy shelling from Syrian government forces in Aleppo, on Monday, August 26th. Aleppo Media Center AMC/AP
Video: Daily State Department Press Briefing FULL. 8/28/2013
Video: "IT'S NOT CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE!" Pentagon Sounding Kinda Defensive About Their Syria Intel
And after all of this… Obama Threatens To Go It Alone On Syria
Ah, yes...President Obama is steaming mad since the Brits and French backed out of his little Syrian adventure, and he saying he's fully prepared to go it alone.
He even sent another American ship towards Syria, a destroyer escort.The Russians already have a fleet of warships headed that way.
Remember what our Dear Leader and his minions said in 2007 and 2008 about 'Cowboy' Bush? Remember the horse manure about "meeting the global Test" and the Magic Wisdom of the International Community?
Biden 2007
Video: Here is Senator Joe Biden: Iran & Impeachment – Biden Saying If “W” Didn’t Get Congressional Approval Before Going to War He’d Seek Impeachment… and Senator Obama Agreed
So what happened? There is very little support by Americans to enter the Syrian Civil War… In a new HuffPo poll, conducted after U.S. officials claimed Syria's government killed thousands of civilians with chemical weapons, shows 25 percent of Americans now support air strikes to aid rebels in Syria, while 41 percent said they are opposed. Another 34 percent said that they're not sure. Germany I also a thumbs down along with Britain and France.
The only logical conclusion is that the truth about the scandals Obama is attempting to divert attention from, by getting involved in Syria, are probably a lot worse than any of us thought. Time for more investigation!!
You be the judge… By Marion Algier – AskMarion~
Saturday, June 8, 2013
The Obama IRS Targeting Scandal in Five Minutes – Unbelievable Abuse of Power
Kudos to Greta Van Susteren for putting together this powerful video exposing the Obama Administration’s attack on conservative Americans:
Video: The Obama IRS Targeting Scandal in Five Minutes – Unbelievable Abuse of Power
Gateway Pundit: The IRS targeted hundreds of conservative groups since 2010. 500 conservative and Christian groups were illegally targeted by the Obama IRS starting in 2010. For twenty-seven months the Obama IRS refused to approve any Tea Party applications for tax-exempt status. At the same time the Obama IRS approved dozens of progressive applications within weeks.
Thursday, November 1, 2012
CLINT EASTWOOD Slams Obama on Benghazi Massacre: “There Should Have Been an Attempt” to Save the Men (Video)
The liberal media is not be reporting on the Benghazi scandal – But the word is spreading around… Clint Eastwood slammed Barack Obama for not attempting to save the American heroes in Benghazi on 9-11:
“I find myself being very resentful about this whole thing in Benghazi. That’s been kind of a tragedy that should have never happened. Or there should have been an attempt. All that you can ask is when there is a crisis like that is to make an attempt. That is the American way.”
Clint Eastwood was on with Sean Hannity Thursday 11.01.12.
Video: Clint Eastwood on Hannity… Clint Slams Obama on Benghazi Massacre
It now looks like Obama never gave the order to save the heroes in Benghazi. They called for help – Obama did nothing.
Related:
Benghazi-gate: Should Congress Start Drafting Articles of Impeachment?
Presidential Depraved Indifference
WOMEN’S GROUP Slams Obama For Abandoning SEALs in Benghazi
Father Of Slain SEAL Tyrone Woods Slams "Cowards" At White House
House Armed Services Committee Chair to Obama: Your Libya Remarks Sound ‘Implausible’
‘The Stories Keep Changing’: President Stonewalls Morning Joe’s Libya Questions
Saxby Chambliss Slams White House for Libya Emails
Father of Murdered Ex-SEAL Rips Obama for Libya Deception
Father of SEAL Slain in Benghazi Attack Demands Answers as Grisly Details Emerge
Video: Special Report Investigates: Death and Deceit In Benghazi W/ Bret Baier
Heart Of Darkness – The Real Benghazi Coverup
Republicans Slam Obama Over Benghazi Emails
More than 20 MILLION (yes, MILLION) weapons “outside of the [Libyan] government’s control
Forbes: White House Watched Benghazi Attacked And Didn’t Respond
Amb. John Bolton ‘On the Record’
Greta Van Susteren: Candy Crowley ‘Clumsy’ on Benghazi Debate Interjection
American Intelligence –> UPDATED INFO ON BENGHAZI ATTACK
Body of lies from Benghazi to Barack — Comprehensive investigative report
Colonel: Hillary Made Decision Not to Post Marines at Benghazi
Hillary Clinton Aide Tells Reporter To “F _ck Off” And “Have A Good Life”
Glenn Beck: Suggesting Libya Embassy Attack Was Planned — American People Being Set Up!
Hillary Clinton, the Law of Karma, and Shattered Dreams
All Starting to Unravel for Obama… and Hillary
Winston Churchill once said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last…
No Marines for Libyan Ambassador, Full Security Detail for Valerie Jarrett Vacation
REPORT: Obama administration was warned about attacks, did nothing – 9.14.12
We Can No Longer Trust a Beclowned American Media…
Day Late… Dollar Short… Spinner in Chief
No Marines for Libyan Ambassador, Full Security Detail for Valerie Jarrett Vacation
Technorati Tags: Clint Eastwood,Eastwooding,GOP,The Choice,Benghazi,Benghzigate,Election 2012,2012 Election,Mitt Romney in 2012,vote Romney-Ryan,Sean Hannity,Congress,Hillary Clinton,Impeach Obama,Obama and Hillary must resign,one term Obama,Romney-Ryan 2012,Vote Mitt Romney in 2012,wake-up America,Greta Van Susteren,Catherine Herridge,Fox News,Get Involved,you be the judge,American heroes,cover-up
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Benghazi Alert: How Can Americans Trust a Commander in Chief Like This… With Our Country… Our Lives… Our Children and Grandchildren? We Cannot!
Although many realized immediately that Benghazi was a terrorist attack and that the Obama administration knew about the attacks on 9/11 within hours if not beforehand, but the day after the last presidential debate of 2012, and every day since, we have learned of emails and additional details that broke the news definitively that the Obama administration watched our Embassy being attacked and our Ambassador and 3 other Americans being murdered in real time, yet they told groups and people who could have helped to stand down. We also now know definitively that President Obama and Hillary Clinton lied to the American people as well as to the the parents of those killed in Benghazi… and that presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who was vilified by the Obama administration over his comments on the event, was right.
Video: Special Report Investigates: Death and Deceit In Benghazi with Bret Baier
Video: Greta Van Susteren with UN Ambassador Bolton on Benghazi Emails
Video: Benghazi Gate Analzyed & Exposed by Brigitte Gabriel, Tom McInerney, Kirk Lippold, & Gary Bernsten
Video: Leaks, Lies, Libya…Lack of Leadership
If there was any question that President Obama was an amateur, incompetent or had no problem lying to the American people this event answers those questions and doubts. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s entire foreign policy has unraveled before our eyes since 9/11/2012. If it was not so close to an election, they should be impeached… recalled… fired. But with election of 2012 being less than two weeks away, these events should seal the deal… yet the mainstream media is still protecting the president.
Senator McCain says Obama’s Libya handling is either a ‘massive coverup’ or gross incompetence verifying that President Obama is The Amateur many have accused him of being or The Great Destroyer believed of him by others. Either way America is in trouble and we cannot survive another four years with Barack Hussein Obama at the helm.
Wake-up America… we cannot have a Commander in Chief (or a secretary of state) who watches Americans being killed in real time and does nothing, and then lies about it over and over again. If America does not elect Mitt Romney after these events, on top of everything else we know… and don’t know about this president, there aren’t words to describe what history will say about us! Team Obama is doing everything possible to keep Benghazigate from unraveling before the election and the lap dog media is juggling for positions to help him, but thanks to Fox News, insiders and Charles Woods, the father of murdered Tyrone Woods, the truth is out there for those paying attention. Help get the word out. America’s life as a free and great nation and your children and grandchildren’s freedoms depend on Romney-Ryan winning on November 6th, 2012!
Father Of Slain SEAL Tyrone Woods Slams "Cowards" At White House
House Armed Services Committee Chair to Obama: Your Libya Remarks Sound ‘Implausible’
‘The Stories Keep Changing’: President Stonewalls Morning Joe’s Libya Questions
Saxby Chambliss Slams White House for Libya Emails
Father of Murdered Ex-SEAL Rips Obama for Libya Deception
Father of SEAL Slain in Benghazi Attack Demands Answers as Grisly Details Emerge
Heart Of Darkness – The Real Benghazi Coverup
Republicans Slam Obama Over Benghazi Emails
More than 20 MILLION (yes, MILLION) weapons “outside of the [Libyan] government’s control
Forbes: White House Watched Benghazi Attacked And Didn’t Respond
Amb. John Bolton ‘On the Record’
Greta Van Susteren: Candy Crowley ‘Clumsy’ on Benghazi Debate Interjection
American Intelligence –> UPDATED INFO ON BENGHAZI ATTACK
Body of lies from Benghazi to Barack — Comprehensive investigative report
Colonel: Hillary Made Decision Not to Post Marines at Benghazi
Hillary Clinton Aide Tells Reporter To “F _ck Off” And “Have A Good Life”
Glenn Beck: Suggesting Libya Embassy Attack Was Planned — American People Being Set Up!
Hillary Clinton, the Law of Karma, and Shattered Dreams
All Starting to Unravel for Obama… and Hillary
Winston Churchill once said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last…
No Marines for Libyan Ambassador, Full Security Detail for Valerie Jarrett Vacation
REPORT: Obama administration was warned about attacks, did nothing – 9.14.12
We Can No Longer Trust a Beclowned American Media…
Day Late… Dollar Short… Spinner in Chief
Technorati Tags: Wake-up America,Commandar in Chief,Liar in Chief,Mitt Romney 2012,Romney-Ryan 2012,time for change,Benghazigate,Greta Van Susteren,Benghazi,Libya,politics over honor,re-election over duty,Obamaland,Hillary Clinton,state department,shame,Barack Obama,Obama administration,cover-up,Benghazi cover-up,terrorist attack,lies,Leon Pannetta,disgrace,the amateur,the great destoryer,the Manchurian President,the Manchurian Candidate,watch the other hand,Fox News,alerts,Bret Baier,Judge Janine Pirro,CIA,Tyrone Woods,navy seals,Ambassador Stevens,UN Ambassador John Bolton
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Saxby Chambliss Slams White House for Libya Emails
![hn_libya1_092712[1]](http://askmarion.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/hn_libya1_0927121_thumb.jpg?w=696&h=393 "hn_libya1_092712[1]")
Politico (By KATIE GLUECK | 10/24/12 7:17 AM EDT):
A senior senator slammed the Obama administration on Wednesday and called for additional hearings on Libya after emails surfaced showing that White House officials knew within hours that an Islamic militant group was taking responsibility for the attacks on the Benghazi-based U.S. Consulate there.
“I don’t know what the White House’s problem has been through this whole thing,” said Sen. Saxby Chambliss, the vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends.” “Here’s what really concerns me: You’ve got four Americans dead, you’ve got an ambassador, a very important person in any administration, dead — and you don’t have the president out there getting briefed on a regular basis, you don’t have the president informing the public about what happened to four key Americans.”
The Georgia Republican’s comments came a day after a report from Reuters indicated that White House and State Department officials “were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi on Sept. 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack,” according to official emails.
The question of when the Obama administration acknowledged that the attacks in Benghazi resulted from terrorism, rather than from “spontaneous” protests in response to an anti-Islam video, has been a point of contention between Republicans and Democrats for weeks, hitting a boiling point during the second presidential debate.
When asked whether he would pursue hearings on Libya as vice chairman of the select committee, Chambliss said, “we are,” adding that he and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the committee, have had “a couple of conversations about this.”
“I told her, I said I think we need to have an open hearing — which is unusual for us, most of ours are classified — but we need to have an open hearing, we need to get the intelligence officials in and just let them lay it out there,” Chambliss said. “This thing is getting more and more traction, more and more legs, and it’s getting uglier every day. And I think the thing we need to do is be honest with the American people — and say, here’s what we knew, here’s when we knew it, here’s what the president knew and when the president knew it.”
Three members of the Senate Armed Services Committee sent a letter to President Barack Obama Wednesday in the wake of the report, writing that “the American people deserve answers” to myriad questions surrounding the Benghazi attacks, and the administration’s response in the days and weeks after the Sept. 11 violence in Libya.
“These emails make clear that your Administration knew within two hours of the attack that it was a terrorist act and that Ansar al-Sharia, a Libyan militant group with links to Al-Qaeda, had claimed responsibility for it,” wrote Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Kelly Ayotte. “This latest revelation only adds to the confusion surrounding what you and your Administration knew about the attacks in Benghazi, when you knew it, and why you responded to those tragic events in the ways that you did.”
McCain (R-Ariz.), Graham (R-S.C.) and Ayotte (R-N.H.) have been especially vocal critics of the administration’s handling of Libya, making the rounds for weeks on morning talk shows and issuing statements demanding answers.
“We believe the American people deserve answers to these and other questions that you and your Administration still have not adequately answered,” they wrote.
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, argued Wednesday that there were consequences to erroneously blaming the anti-Islam video for the attacks in Benghazi.
“And why this is important — not because who did what, when, is a problem here,” Rogers said on CNN’s “Starting Point.” “It’s about the fact that decisions were made, big policy decisions, including elevating the video that, if you…read those e-mails, nothing about the video, it elevated the video and actually caused more protests across the Middle East.”
He referenced protests that occurred in places like Tunisia in the days after the Benghazi attacks.
“What I believe happened…is that somebody saw something that they thought was the way that they wanted to talk about it, versus what the facts on the ground were,” Rogers said. “Because, think about it, even when that narrative was starting to develop, ‘Oh, this was spontaneous, it wasn’t planned, it wasn’t really a terrorist attack,’ on Sept. 13, we had another jihadist attack on an embassy in Tunisia….So you see this pattern of activity; it’s really hard to come to this conclusion that was just spontaneous, and just kind of happened. So that’s what we’re trying to figure out.”
Hillary Clinton… tap dancing and trying to save her political future said that the Republicans are cherry picking emails. Read more at: Hillary Clinton urges caution on newly released emails detailing Libya attack.
People in the know, people who were paying attention or just have good instincts, and most in the intelligence committee knew from day… no, moment one, that Benghazi was a terrorist attack and that Ambassador Stevens and the other men killed there were worried about their lives because of lack of security. And nobody believed that the Benghazi attacks we spontaneous or had anything to do with an amateur hardly watched video. There is no doubt much more to this cover-up and and what they are covering up and it will no doubt be long after the election before we get the details, if ever. But Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney was right in his initial assessment, yet the media allowed the Team Obama demonize him. Wake-up America… vote Romney-Ryan on November 6th. Team Obama is doing everything possible to keep Benghazigate from unraveling before the Election.
Related:
Republicans Slam Obama Over Benghazi Emails
More than 20 MILLION (yes, MILLION) weapons “outside of the [Libyan] government’s control
Forbes: White House Watched Benghazi Attacked And Didn’t Respond
Amb. John Bolton ‘On the Record’
Greta Van Susteren: Candy Crowley ‘Clumsy’ on Benghazi Debate Interjection
American Intelligence –> UPDATED INFO ON BENGHAZI ATTACK
Body of lies from Benghazi to Barack — Comprehensive investigative report
Colonel: Hillary Made Decision Not to Post Marines at Benghazi
Hillary Clinton Aide Tells Reporter To “F _ck Off” And “Have A Good Life”
Glenn Beck: Suggesting Libya Embassy Attack Was Planned — American People Being Set Up!
Hillary Clinton, the Law of Karma, and Shattered Dreams
All Starting to Unravel for Obama… and Hillary
Winston Churchill once said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last…
No Marines for Libyan Ambassador, Full Security Detail for Valerie Jarrett Vacation
REPORT: Obama administration was warned about attacks, did nothing – 9.14.12
We Can No Longer Trust a Beclowned American Media…
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Rush Limbaugh Isn’t the Only Media Misogynist
Van Susteren Blasts President for Keeping $1 Million From ‘Serial Pig’ Bill Maher: ‘Is That the Obama Price Tag for Decency?’
Do you wonder if the Obama campaign is laughing with Bill Maher? Or worse…laughing at Americans?
Outspoken On The Record host Greta Van Susteren blasted President Obama, along with his senior campaign strategist David Axelrod, for what she sees as the clear double standard relating to Bill Maher‘s history of misogynistic comments and Rush Limbaugh’s remarks about Georgetown agitator Sandra Fluke.
On her blog Thursday, Greta lampooned the president for “looking the other way” and keeping Maher’s $1 million contribution to the Obama Super PAC. She asked if that was the president’s “price tag for decency.”
She also tore into Axelrod’s slated appearance on Bill Maher’s Real Time – directly after he criticized Mitt Romney for not condemning (to his degree of satisfaction) Limbaugh.
From Greta Wire:
Is everyone for sale? At least Ed Schultz and Rush Limbaugh apologized (which I think appropriate) for their boorish behavior and their boorish behavior is nothing like Bill Maher! Maher is a serial pig. And Maher, to get cover for continuous vile behavior, gives a million dollars to the Obama super Pac so that the President looks the other way and the President does. Go figure! Is that the Obama price tag for decency? Give a million and you can be as nasty to women as you want? How does President Obama – who dragged his daughters into this, I did not – handle this with his daughters when Maher is the quintessential woman degrader? The C word to women – Maher’s apparent favorite – is as vile as it gets. Do you wonder if the Obama campaign is laughing with Bill Maher? Or worse…laughing at Americans?
Greta adds a “PS” in which she says Maher “can’t hide behind, ‘I am comedian.’”
“Being a comedian is not license to be a bigot or degrade women. Seinfeld is more successful and never degrading,” she concluded.
Needless to say, many will cheer Greta’s candor in exposing the hypocrisy of the left, and in this particular instance, the administration.
(h/t Mediaite)
Rush Limbaugh Isn’t the Only Media Misogynist
Rush Limbaugh apologized on Saturday for calling a Georgetown Law student a slut for testifying about contraception and starting a firestorm of outrage. Kirsten Powers says the liberals who led the charge need to start holding their own side accountable.
Did you know there is a war on women?
Boycotts are reserved for people on the right like Rush Limbaugh, who finally apologized Saturday for calling a 30-year-old Georgetown Law student, Sandra Fluke, a “slut” after she testified before congress about contraception. Limbaugh’s apology was likely extracted to stop the departure of any more advertisers, who were rightly under pressure from liberal groups outraged by the comments.
Let it be shouted from the rooftops that Rush Limbaugh should not have called Ms. Fluke a slut or, as he added later, a “prostitute” who should post her sex tapes. It’s unlikely that his apology will assuage the people on a warpath for his scalp, and after all, why should it? He spent days attacking a woman as a slut and prostitute and refused to relent. Now because he doesn’t want to lose advertisers, he apologizes. What’s in order is something more like groveling—and of course a phone call to Ms. Fluke—if you ask me.
But if Limbaugh’s actions demand a boycott—and they do—then what about the army of swine on the left?
During the 2008 election Ed Schultz said on his radio show that Sarah Palin set off a “bimbo alert.” He called Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut.” (He later apologized.) He once even took to his blog to call yours truly a “bimbo” for the offense of quoting him accurately in a New York Post column.
Keith Olbermann has said that conservative commentator S.E. Cupp should have been aborted by her parents, apparently because he finds her having opinions offensive. He called Michelle Malkin a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick.” He found it newsworthy to discuss Carrie Prejean’s breasts on his MSNBC show. His solution for dealing with Hillary Clinton, who he thought should drop out of the presidential race, was to find “somebody who can take her into a room and only he comes out.” Olbermann now works for über-leftist and former Democratic vice president Al Gore at Current TV.
The grand pooh-bah of media misogyny is without a doubt Bill Maher.
Left-wing darling Matt Taibbi wrote on his blog in 2009, “When I read [Malkin’s] stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of balls in her mouth.” In a Rolling Stone article about Secretary of State Clinton, he referred to her “flabby arms.” When feminist writer Erica Jong criticized him for it, he responded by referring to Jong as an “800-year old sex novelist.” (Jong is almost 70, which apparently makes her an irrelevant human being.) In Taibbi’s profile of Congresswoman and presidential candidate Michele Bachmann he labeled her “batshit crazy.” (Oh, those “crazy” women with their hormones and all.)
Interactive: 150 Fearless Women
Chris Matthews’s sickening misogyny was made famous in 2008, when he obsessively tore down Hillary Clinton for standing between Barack Obama and the presidency, something that Matthews could not abide. Over the years he has referred to the former first lady, senator and presidential candidate and current secretary of state as a “she-devil,” “Nurse Ratched,” and “Madame Defarge.” Matthews has also also called Clinton “witchy,” “anti-male,” and “uppity” and once claimed she won her Senate seat only because her “husband messed around.” He asked a guest if “being surrounded by women” makes “a case for commander in chief—or does it make a case against it?” At some point Matthews was shamed into sort of half apologizing to Clinton, but then just picked up again with his sexist ramblings.
Matthews has wondered aloud whether Sarah Palin is even “capable of thinking” and has called Bachmann a “balloon head” and said she was “lucky we still don’t have literacy tests out there.” Democratic strategist Jehmu Greene, who is the former president of the Women’s Media Center, told Fox News’ Megyn Kelly in 2011 that Matthews “is a bully, and his favorite target is women.” So why does he still have a show? What if his favorite target was Jews? Or African-Americans?
But the grand pooh-bah of media misogyny is without a doubt Bill Maher—who also happens to be a favorite of liberals—who has given $1 million to President Obama’s super PAC. Maher has called Palin a “dumb twat” and dropped the C-word in describing the former Alaska governor. He called Palin and Congresswoman Bachmann “boobs” and “two bimbos.” He said of the former vice-presidential candidate, “She is not a mean girl. She is a crazy girl with mean ideas.” He recently made a joke about Rick Santorum’s wife using a vibrator. Imagine now the same joke during the 2008 primary with Michelle Obama’s name in it, and tell me that he would still have a job. Maher said of a woman who was harassed while breast-feeding at an Applebee’s, “Don't show me your tits!” as though a woman feeding her child is trying to flash Maher. (Here’s a way to solve his problem: don’t stare at a strangers’ breasts). Then, his coup de grâce: “And by the way, there is a place where breasts and food do go together. It’s called Hooters!”
Liberals—you know, the people who say they “fight for women”—comprise Maher’s audience, and a parade of high-profile liberals make up his guest list. Yet have any of them confronted him? Nope. That was left to Ann Coulter, who actually called Maher a misogynist to his face, an opportunity that feminist icon Gloria Steinem failed to take when she appeared on his show in 2011.
This is not to suggest that liberals—or feminists—never complain about misogyny. Many feminist blogs now document attacks on women on the left and the right, including Jezebel, Shakesville, and the Women’s Media Center (which was cofounded by Steinem). But when it comes to high-profile campaigns to hold these men accountable—such as that waged against Limbaugh—the real fury seems reserved only for conservatives, while the men on the left get a wink and a nod as long as they are carrying water for the liberal cause.
After all, if Limbaugh’s outburst is part of the “war on women,” then what is the routine misogyny of liberal media men?
It’s time for some equal-opportunity accountability. Without it, the fight against media misogyny will continue to be perceived as a proxy war for the Democratic Party, not a fight for fair treatment of women in the public square.
by Kirsten Powers – Originally Posted: Mar 4, 2012 10:00 AM EST – The Daily Beast
Read Power’s full piece: Kirsten Powers Tells Megyn Kelly ‘Liberal Men Are Allowed to Be Misogynist, Apparently’
And to make this all ever more unbelievable is that has come to light that Sandra Fluke was absolutely a plant by the left with connections and direction from as high as the White House… through former WH Marxist operative Anita Dunn.
Related: Fluke Spin
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Best Political Commercial – Barry Hinckley
Am I right? is this campaign ad the best ever? who is the star? Senate candidate Barry Hinckley’s son…. He is 5 years old
Video: Best Political Commercial – Barry Hinckley
Hinckley for US Senate - Economics for five year olds - A Rhode Island economics lesson with 5 year old Hudson Hinckley, son of Barry Hinckley.
h/t to Greta Van Susteren - Greta says, I am not telling you to vote for or against Barry Hinckley… but this is a cute commercial!!
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
PALIN SLAMS GOP PRESIDENTIAL FIELD: ‘THEY DON’T HAVE A RECORD TO STAND ON’
The ever-elusive Sarah Palin is at it again. Following last night’s CNN/Tea Party Express GOP debate, the former Alaska governor launched attacks on a good portion of the Republican presidential field — a move that could further fuel speculation that she is looking to take a last-minute jump into presidential campaign waters.
Palin’s complaints about the candidates are plentiful. To begin, she feels they haven’t properly touched upon debt or deficit spending. Because of what she sees as a lack of focus in this area, she says, “they don’t have a record to stand on.”
Then there’s Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s HPV drama, which Palin also commented on. The Hill has more:
“I knew there was something to it,” Palin said of learning while she was Alaska’s governor that her Texas counterpart had given the go-ahead to the vaccine. “Now we’re finding that now, yea, something was up with that issue. It was an illustration or bit of evidence of some crony capitalism.”
Here Palin is referring to Rep. Michele Bachmann’s charge that Perry allowed a law mandating that young girls get the HPV shot because of a $5,000 campaign donation and a relationship he had with a former chief of staff.
Despite uttering these negative views, she did commend Bachmann for her willingness to call out fellow Republicans. Additionally, she called former House Speaker Newt Gingrich “bold” for addressing government waste and dubbed businessman Herman Cain’s private sector background “great.”
Watch her make these comments on Fox News’ “On the Record” with Greta Van Susteren, below:
Video: Palin on CNN/Tea Party Debate With Greta On The Record
While Palin still refuses to declare whether or not she’ll seek the American presidency, she’s “getting kind a kick” out of the way in which the candidates are responding to her. According to the former vice-presidential nominee, those vying for the GOP nod tend to adopt and then cover whatever topic she’s speaking about.
“I’m still thinking about it,” she said following Monday night’s debate. “I’m not going to let the media tell me, dictate when a drop-dead date should be,” she added.
Thus, the speculation continues.
(h/t The Hill)
CNN / GOP Tea Party Debate - The True Winners
CNN teamed up with the Tea Party Express to air another GOP Debate live from Tampa FL last night.
Patriots, give yourselves a round of applause. You were the true stars and winners of the CNN/Tea Party Express Republican Presidential Debate last night. Opinions vary as to which presidential candidate won. We The People were the biggest winners because for the first time millions who do not watch Fox News, do not listen to conservative talk radio and do not read conservative blogs got to see who we really are; not a bunch of redneck racists.
As Mary and I sat in the audience, I felt extremely proud of my Tea Party family. You showed the world you are articulate and well-informed regarding the issues. Regardless of the candidate, in response to their answers, you cheered and booed at the correct times. The contrast between tea party patriots and clueless Obama voters is quite glaring.
Brother and sister patriots, we have come a long way in two and a half years. I realized at the debate the days of simply attending “ra-ra” rallies are over. You guys have morphed into a massive army of well-educated well-prepared foot soldiers; boots on the ground doing the work to take back America. Just as Jesus instructed His disciples to fail not to assemble themselves together, tea party rallies are now for inspiration, ministering to each other and fellowship.
Each of you please continue using your gifts and talents and following your passion for our common goal. And still, our extraordinary Tea Party movement does not have a single Commander-in-Chief.
On second thought, I take that back. I believe we DO have a Commander-in-Chief. God!
I was amazed by the number of you who told me about your new conservative radio show, new books, new outreach to minorities, new art project to spread the conservative message, new prayer group for America and etc. You guys blew me away. You are awesome! We are winning! God bless.
By Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
Co-Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.
Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.
Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin
LloydMarcus.com
Related:
Santorum Blasts Paul on 9/11 Comments…
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
The Donald… Donald Trump: Obama presidency possibly illegal and Says American Airports are "Third World"
'To be honest with you, I want him to have a birth certificate'
Posted: March 29, 2011 - 1:35 am Eastern - By Joe Kovacs - © 2011 WorldNetDaily
Billionaire developer and possible Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is now suggesting Barack Obama's presidency could be "illegal" if legitimate proof is not provided demonstrating the commander in chief is indeed a "natural born citizen" of the U.S.
Trump's use of the "I" word came last night during a phoneinterviewwith Greta Van Susteren of the Fox News Channel.
Help get TV commercials on the air to bust Obama's eligibility wide open!
"To be honest with you, I want him to have a birth certificate," Trump said, "because [otherwise] that would mean that his presidency was, I guess you'd have to say, illegal. You have to be born in the United States. I hope that he was born in the United States. I hope – but I want to get rid of the word hope, I want to know for sure – I hope that he was born in the United States and I hope this doesn't become a big issue."
Video: Donald Trump on Fox: Obama's Presidency May Be Illegal - 3/28/2011
Trump defended so-called "birthers," explaining, "They just want to see the president was born in this country."
He also called into question Hawaii's Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie for suggesting he remembered when Obama was born nearly a half century ago.
"I'll bet he didn't even know the parents 50 years ago," Trump said. "I think it's absolutely insane. What he's doing is taking a bullet for the party by making a statement that, 'I remember.'"
Trump also wondered why no doctors or nurses have come forward to announce their presence at Obama's birth.
"Here's the president of the United States, and no doctor, no nurse, nobody's come forward saying, 'I delivered that beautiful baby.'"
A photo of Donald Trump's hospital-generated birth certificate (courtesy ABC News)
"He spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue. Millions of dollars in legal fees trying to get away from this issue. I brought it up just routinely. All of a sudden a lot of facts are emerging, and I'm starting to wonder myself whether he was born in this country," Trump said on "Fox & Friends."
"This guy either has a birth certificate or he doesn't," he added. "I didn't think it was such a big deal, but I will tell you it's turning out to be a very big deal. Because people now are calling me from all over saying please don't give up on this issue.
AsWND reported just a week ago, not even one person in 10 says Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president, according to a new scientific poll that also reveals political independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue. Another 32 percent would disregard the questions entirely, concluding they are not valid.
While much of the concern centers on Obama's birthcertificate– he's refused to release his originaldocumentspecifying the birth hospital and doctor's name, substituting instead a computer-generated summary of information purportedly in the Hawaii state archives – there are numerous other documents that remain unavailable.
These are the types of records that typically are available for major political leaders such as someone occupying the Oval Office.They include his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records,his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
Source: WND - Donald Trump: Obama presidency possibly illegal - http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=280725#ixzz1I0xgDiRI
Donald Trump: American Airports are "Third World"
The appeal of Donald Trump is due to the man’s bluntness. It’s remarkably refreshing to hear, even if you disagree with his conclusions.
For instance, The Donald is no fan of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, telling HUMAN EVENTS that Iraq in particular is now the “Harvard University of terrorism.” Trump would rather build American infrastructure, rather than the infrastructure of some foreign country, especially in a region of the world where a costly piece of property is likely to get blown sky high.
Trump’s philosophy: “I want to build our highways. When I look at airports in China, at airports in Abu Dhabi and Qatar and the different places, [and then] you land in New York, at LaGuardia Airport, at Kennedy Airport, it’s like a Third World airport system.” (We can attest, LaGuardia Airport is on par with a rat hole.)
Here’s part three of our wide-ranging and in-depth interview with one of the most successful businessmen in the history of the planet. Besides America’s crumbling infrastructure, don’t miss what he has to say about George W. Bush.
Exit question: If a President Donald Trump were given what he thought was solid intelligence from this country and our allies abroad, that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and was ready to use them, what would he have done? Find out.
Source: Human Events
Related:
On GretaWire: DONALD TRUMP going ON THE RECORD at 10pm (and is HE fired up!) - Donald the Birther?
On GretaWire: Amb John Bolton, Gov Sarah Palin, Kirsten Powers, Donald Trump ….all … - Palin on Obama's 'War' & Amb Bolton: Who's Really in Charge of Libya Mission?
O’Leary: NRA, Evangelical (and Tea Party) Uprising Will Win in 2012
Rush: Trump’s Birth Certificate Outcry Is Service to Everyone
VIDEO: Donald Trump Takes on Whoopi, 'The View' Over Obama's Birth Certificate
Exclusive to NewsMax: Donald Trump Releases His Birth Certificate - As all presidential candidates legally must if asked.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
