GBTV - Where the Truth Lives

Election Season 2012 has Officially Begun

Obama has officially announced his run for a second term and the GOP field is full. We are in the fight of our lives America... Don't sit this one out and don't be swayed away from the better candidates by the left's false reporting. Campaign, Support and Fight like Hell for the candidate of your choice in the primaries. And then unite behind the GOP candidate whomever she or he is because we are voting for Freedom. Our Nation's Future are at stake!!


Not voting because your candidate of choice is not the GOP standard bearer or voting for write ins and 3rd party candidates will only guarantee 4-more years of Obama and the demise of America. Please stand-up and be counted!



The Founding Father's Real Reason for the Second Amendment

And remember the words of Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." See Video of Suzanna Gratia-Hupp’s Congressional Testimony: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For, below (u-tube HERE).

Palin Fevor... Catch It~

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Democrat Proposes Jail Time for 'Hostile' Bloggers

Wow… What happened to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press??

We know that the government is becoming more and more audacious in its attempts to control our lives and regulate our speech and whatever it thinks we're thinking (see the newest iteration of the federal Hate Crimes law), so a new story from Wired should come as no surprise. Looks like Democratic Rep. Linda Sanchez, Calif., is ready to throw mean-old bloggers in the hoosegow.


From the Wired report:

Proposed congressional legislation would demand up to two years in prison for those whose electronic speech is meant to “coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person.”  

Instead of prison, perhaps we should say gulag.  

The proposal by Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Los Angeles, would never pass First Amendment muster, unless the U.S. Constitution was altered without us knowing. So Sanchez, and the 14 other lawmakers who signed on to the proposal, are grandstanding to show the public they care about children and are opposed to cyberbullying.

The bill, HR 1966, is available to read here.  

UPDATE: In case the Thomas link to HR 1966 doesn't work, here's the portion of the text of the bill that would actually change the U.S. Code.
SEC. 3. CYBERBULLYING.
(a) In General- Chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
`Sec. 881. Cyberbullying
`(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
`(b) As used in this section--

`(1) the term `communication' means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user's choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; and
`(2) the term `electronic means' means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.'

Source:  Townhall.com

Related Resources:

0 comments:

Post a Comment