Obama's Push for Copenhagen Deal Could Violate Constitution

President Obama's mission to save the planet from global warming could end up trampling on the U.S. Constitution, critics say.

When Obama arrives in Copenhagen Friday, he is hoping to cut a deal on a new global-warming agreement. Even though the conference is not likely to produce a legally binding deal, critics say if the president signs an international climate treaty pledging reductions in carbon emissions, he will violate the Constitution.

"President Obama cannot bind the American people to job killing international agreements on climate change without the advice and consent of the United States Senate," former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich wrote Wednesday at the conservative Web site Human Events.

The Constitution states that the president cannot sign treaties without the approval of two-thirds of the Senate.

But with climate change legislation stuck in the Senate after the House passed its version earlier this year, the White House is flirting with the possibility of taking action without Congress.

Last week, on the day the climate summit opened in Denmark, the EPA formally declared that greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide are a danger to human health -- a finding that could pave the way for massive new regulations under the Clean Air Act for cars, power plants, crude-oil refineries and chemical plants.

While administration officials have said they would prefer Congress take action on regulating greenhouse gas emissions, Republicans fear the EPA, buoyed by its latest finding, is prepared to act unilaterally.

Democratic Rep. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, co-author of the House climate change bill, told Fox News that the Obama administration has the power to act without Congress through the EPA.

"It's no longer a question of legislation or no legislation," he told Fox News' Chris Wallace. "It is now a question of legislation or regulation. The EPA can act.

"And so this is now something which is going to happen. And the only question now is whether or not, as you say, command and control of the EPA is going to be the way in which we solve the problem, or legislation that allows us to protect trade-intensive, energy-intensive industries, to protect consumers."

But Gingrich warned of an uprising if the Obama administration takes action through the EPA.

"Similarly, he can't bypass the peoples' representatives in Congress by having the EPA pursue the same goals through bureaucratic totalitarianism," he wrote.

"This message to the president is also a message to Congress. Should the Obama administration act unilaterally and subvert the Constitution, the American people will rightfully rise up in opposition."

Global leaders were expected to arrive before Friday's summit finale to sign a political outline of a global warming treaty that would set limits on carbon dioxide pollution by the United States, China and India, as well as extend emissions targets for the 37 countries regulated under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which was never ratified by the U.S.

So far, negotiations in Copenhagen have been rocky. The Obama administration is looking to strike a loose agreement on guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions, with a binding treaty to follow sometime in the future.

But Obama has received one warning from a member of his party on signing a treaty. Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., told Obama in a letter late last month not to commit the U.S. to any binding climate standards in Copenhagen without congressional support.

"As you well know from your time in the Senate, only specific legislation agreed upon in the Congress, or a treaty ratified by the Senate, could actually create such a commitment on behalf of our country," he wrote.

Webb's office could not be reached for further comment.

The Center for Biological Diversity Climate Law Institute, however, argues the Supreme Court has given the president the legal authority to bypass Congress and bind the country internationally through an "executive agreement" and that Congress itself has given the president specific authority to negotiate international agreements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In a report, the institute also claims that Obama could "make an international commitment grounded in his power -- and indeed, his duty -- to enforce existing U.S. environmental laws," such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act.

"In short, any one of these sources of authority would allow President Obama to make a binding, meaningful commitment to the international community," the institute wrote in the report, titled "Yes He Can: President Obama's Power to Make an International Climate Commitment Without Waiting for Congress."

"Together, these congressional enactments and environmental statutes give President Obama a very strong hand -- strong enough to do what the science demands, and not just what a divided and rancorous Congress might someday allow."

But others framed Obama's trip to Copenhagen in very different terms.

"Who will President Obama heed?" Vince Haley, vice president of policy at American Solutions for Winning the Future, wrote in an opinion article published in FoxNews.com. "The American people and our constitutional system of checks and balances, or the collection of dictators, tyrants, and most undemocratic heads of government convened by the United Nations in Copenhagen this week?

"They are tempting the American president to do what he wants to do and what they mostly do: ignore the will of their own people and sign a political agreement based on an unconstitutional sham."

Obama, who will have the venomous pro Cap and Trade Nancy Pelosi at his side, can make promises and agreements, but a treaty requires a 2/3 vote of Congress. And if Obama’s commitments are unconstitutional, they can be reversed. Let us hope he chooses not to over-step and to listen to the American people, if not the combination of Copenhagen and passing ObamaCare, another unconstitutional program in many ways that between 66% and 77% (depending on the poll) of Americans do not want will be his undoing. It will make him a one term president, with huge losses in the House, Senate and Governorships in 2010 as well as 2012, hampering his ability of passing additional unwanted legislation in his final two years and very likely having most of his proposed legislation overturned.

Obama’s poll numbers continue dropping as America’s disappointment, fear and anger grows.

FOXNews.com

COPENHAGEN: AFRICAN DICTATORS DEMAND "DEMOCRACY"

The Copenhagen conference on climate change, held amid record low freezing temperatures that are blanketing Europe, was shattered by a walkout by the G-77 nations, the bloc of "developing" countries that spans from China to Chad. Their demand? More "democracy and transparency" in the negotiations! They also want massive American and European aid under the guise of helping them adjust to climate change.

Dictators from Bejing to Africa are united in their demand for more "democracy" at the conference and are all deeply disturbed that Copenhagen may not turn out to be payday for which they had all hoped.

Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton has called the climate change issue, a "pretext for a massive redistribution of wealth from the developed nations to the less developed ones." That's what the African and Asian dictators are hoping for.

Like anti-poverty storefronts in Harlem that change to drug rehab projects and then morph into stimulus programs, the less developed nations are now hanging out the climate change sign in the hopes of getting aid.

The fact is that almost all the increase in greenhouse gases over the next two decades is going to come from developing countries, principally China and India. As noted in an earlier column, the United States is doing quite well, without a new treaty and without cap and trade, on lowering its emissions to the level demanded by the Kyoto Agreement and the goal set by President Obama. It is about halfway toward each.

But the developing countries are hoping to make a killing in Copenhagen, getting a treaty that does not bind them to specific enforceable goals (and no inspections) while giving them money to accomplish the climate change goals. Money without responsibility suits them fine.

Just as climate change is being hijacked in developed countries by socialists and liberals who want to regulate business and utilities, so it is being exploited by less developed countries as a pretext for more foreign aid.

China, in particular, won't allow any international monitoring of its compliance with the climate change goals. This refusal is giving Democratic trade protectionists the cover they need to raise tariff barriers on imports from abroad. Yet again, climate change is being hijacked by partisans of a particular persuasion - protectionists - to suit their goals.

Meanwhile, most voters in the U.S. are far from convinced that climate change is happening as a result of human activity and there is no broad consensus behind any of the regulatory changes being pushed in Copenhagen. That's the surprise awaiting Obama when he returns, treaty in hand… or at least the commitment of $200 million for 3rd World emissions aid and reduction of US emissions by another 17%, while Americans are struggling to make ends meet and people in the 3rd World continue to starve and die from lack of clean water, food and disease (that any feel are caused by the UN and the like of those running the UN, Cogenhagen and the G20.

Source: Dick Morris at DickMorris.com and Right Wing Stuff

URGENT: FIGHT BACK AGAINST GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: SIGN THE “INSTRUMENT OF REPUDIATION” NOW (Part VII)

Urgent Letter From Lord Monckton – Please Sign Petition

Urgent letter from Lord Christopher Monckton

As I write this, leaders of 190 countries will soon be gathering at a UN “global warming” conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. They will be negotiating a treaty creating an unelected world government with unlimited powers to end free markets worldwide, to tax financial markets out of existence, to grab the equivalent of more than half the U.S. defense budget each year, to interfere directly in your nation’s economic and environmental affairs, and to redistribute your hard-earned dollars to third-world nations in reparation for imagined and imaginary “climate debt.”

When I first revealed the dangerous scope of the draft Copenhagen Treaty in a speech in the U.S. in mid-October, three million people viewed a video clip of me on YouTube discussing that treaty within three weeks – the quickest and biggest Web response to any political speech, ever.

Why was the response so overwhelming? Because Americans care about their great nation and its great Constitution. You believe in democracy.

FIGHT BACK AGAINST GLOBAL GOVERNANCE:

SIGN THE “INSTRUMENT OF REPUDIATION” AND “ALL PAIN, NO GAIN” PETITIONS NOW!

The tired litany of contrived disasters, debacles, catastrophes, cataclysms, Armageddons, and apocalypses mournfully recited by Al Gore and other “global warming” profiteers is ringing hollow in voters’ ears.

In recent weeks, opinion polls in the U.S., Canada, the UK, and Australia have all confirmed a massive collapse in public belief in the “global warming” superstition, notwithstanding the hundreds of billions being spent worldwide on alarmist propaganda by governments and environmentalists.

For years Gore has been dodging a public debate with me on the question of “global warming.” Why? Because he’d lose, big-time. “Global warming” was not, is not, and will never be a global crisis.

World leaders, led by the nose by a handful of politically-motivated scientists and a crowd of what Lenin called “useful idiots” in the media and in academe, are about to bring democracy to an end worldwide – and all for the sake of stopping “global warming” that will not occur.

Recent science has finally proved that the warming effect of our greenhouse-gas emissions is small, harmless, and even beneficial.

Globally, we increase the atmospheric concentration of CO2 by 2 parts per million by volume per year. Even if the UN’s exaggerated estimate of the warming effect of CO2 were right, it would take 23 years at this rate to push up “global warming” by just 1 Fahrenheit degree.

In practice, though, the effect of CO2 is only one-seventh of what the UN imagines – so make that at least 150 years with no carbon emissions worldwide, at all, just to prevent 1°F of future warming. So the draft Treaty’s draconian measures are as economically futile as they are scientifically pointless. Game over.

FIGHT BACK AGAINST GLOBAL GOVERNANCE:

SIGN THE “INSTRUMENT OF REPUDIATION” AND “ALL PAIN, NO GAIN” PETITIONS NOW!

In fact, there has been no “global warming” for 15 years. There has been global cooling for 9 years. This, too, has gone almost unreported. Until recently, the world had been warming for 300 years.

For at least 280 of those 300 years, we could not have been in any way to blame. Even if the world were still warming, which it is not, the fact of that warming would not tell us anything about the cause of the warming.

So there is no need for the Copenhagen Treaty, and no need for the thousand-page climate policies now before both Houses of Congress.

What can you do to stop the massive costs to both our freedom and economic prosperity? You can take action by signing the “Instrument of Repudiation of the Treaty” and then voice your opinion against global warming policies like cap and trade by signing the “All Pain, No Gain” petition.

Get all of your family, relatives, friends, and contacts to do the same. If you love your great country and its athletic democracy as much as I do, you must act now, before it is too late.

Yours truly,

Lord Christopher Monckton
Third Viscount of Brenchly

Former Advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

P.S. I have just released a brand new short video about the threat of global governance which you can watch on this AllPainNoGain.org website. Please take action immediately to sign the “Instrument of Repudiation of the Treaty” and the “All Pain, No Gain” petition.

Also, please sign Lord Monckton's Instrument of Repudiation opposing the Treaty of Copenhagen.

click to sign here ===> Sign Petition (Instrument of Repudiation) Opposing Treaty of Copenhagen (a US address is required)

click to ===> Read Instrument of Repudiation or View PDF of Instrument of Repudiation (sharper)

click to ===> View Distribution of Signers by Age and Residence State

Please read my urgent letter regarding how the United Nations is planning to use the issue of "global warming" to establish a new global government at a summit taking place in Copenhagen, and sign the petitions below.
Lord Christopher Monckton
Third Viscount of Brenchley

The petition reads:

"We, the undersigned, urge our political leaders to strongly oppose policies like cap and trade and other domestic or international mandates that would recklessly slash carbon emissions, based on unproven fears of man-made global warming. We also urge them to support policies that keep energy reliable and affordable, protect American jobs, fully develop all of our domestic energy resources, and promote genuine environmental progress."

Oppose the upcoming Treaty of Copenhagen – Visit http://www.webcommentary.com/signrep.php to read why and to sign a petition (Instrument of Repudiation) opposing the forthcoming Treaty!

click to ===> Visit our Climate Change page

-----------

Also: Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

Most scientists have a detailed knowledge of their own narrow field of specialization, a general knowledge of fundamental science, an understanding of the scientific method, and a mental model that encompasses a broad range of scientific disciplines. This model serves as the basis of their thoughts about scientific questions.

When a scientist desires to refine his understanding of a specific scientific subject, he often begins by reading one or more review articles about that topic. As he reads, he compares the facts given in the review with his mental model of the subject, refining his model and updating it with current information. Review articles do not present new discoveries. The essential facts given in the review must be referenced to the peer-reviewed scientific research literature, so that the reader can check the assertions and conclusions of the article and obtain more detailed information about aspects that interest him.

A 12-page review article about the human-caused global warming hypothesis is circulated with the petition. To view the entire article in html, 150-dpi PDF, 300-dpi PDF, 600-dpi PDF, Spanish or figures alone in powerpoint or flash, click on the appropriate item in this sentence.

The factual information cited in this article is referenced to the underlying research literature, in this case by 132 references listed at the end of the article. Although written primarily for scientists, most of this article can be understood without formal scientific training. This article was submitted to many scientists for comments and suggestions before it was finalized and submitted for publication. It then underwent ordinary peer review by the publishing journal.

The United Nations IPCC also publishes a research review in the form of a voluminous, occasionally-updated report on the subject of climate change, which the United Nations asserts is “authored” by approximately 600 scientists. These “authors” are not, however – as is ordinarily the custom in science – permitted power of approval the published review of which they are putative authors. They are permitted to comment on the draft text, but the final text neither conforms to nor includes many of their comments. The final text conforms instead to the United Nations objective of building support for world taxation and rationing of industrially-useful energy.

http://www.petitionproject.org/review_article.php

Under pressure from the powers that be the EPA Formally Declares CO2 a Dangerous Pollutant

The EPA declares CO2 a dangerous pollutant. CO2 is a natural substance and what you exhale. This is ridiculous. Most conservative analysts see this as a warning to Congress to pass Cap & Trade or else the EPA will get involved with harsh restrictions on carbon emissions. To show how crazy that is, H2O is the major green house gas in the atmosphere at 65-85%, so with this logic water could be declared a dangerous pollutant.
I saw a commentator say that instead of Congress bowing to the EPA by passing Cap & Trade they should pass a bill to revoke the EPAs ability to regulate CO2 output. Not a bad idea! The liberals will never go along with that, but we can try.

I heard Dick Morris say earlier that we are half way to what would have been the suggested CO2 emission levels for the US , set by the Kyoto treaty, without government interference or UN regulation. That's right, just with good old Yankee ingenuity and the free market... What a concept~

Both Cap and Trade and Obamacare are designed to destroy American freedoms and sovereignty and to hand huge amounts of additional power to the government. Add to that the financial destruction the costs of these two programs will do to the Country and average Americans… you have created the ingredients of a socialistic state… or worse a state of the “World” controlled by the United Nations. Stopping ObamaCare, Cap and Trade, additional spending by government, the loss of any additional freedoms and preventing Obama from making anymore ‘world” commitments . We stand at a precipice! The time to act is now… or your decisions and future life will me made for you! The time is much shorter than you think!

Please join this fight today!! Sign and share the petition above, educate yourself if you do not know the issues and the Constitution and join the fight for the freedom of
America… the greatest Republic the World has ever seen~

Danish Parliamentary Speaker: Climate debate derailed? - Saying politicians gullibly turn shaky theories into facts

THE Speaker of the Danish Parliament suggests politicians gullibly turn theories into facts. - Foto: BORBERG THOMAS

The Speaker of the Danish Parliament has issued a damning criticism of the climate debate, saying politicians gullibly turn theories into facts.

As the world prepares to converge on Copenhagen for the COP15 Climate Summit, Denmark’s Speaker of Parliament has expressed serious doubts as to the way in which the climate debate has developed.

“The problem is that lots of people go around saying that the climate change we see is a result of human activity. That is a very dangerous claim,” Parliamentary Speaker and former Finance Minister Thor Pedersen (Lib) tells DR.

“Unfortunately I seem to experience that scientists say: ‘We have a theory’ – then that crosses the road to the politicians who say: ‘We know’. Who can be bothered to hear a scientist who says ‘I have a theory’ when politicians go around saying ‘I know’” Thor Pedersen says.

SPEAKER Thor Pedersen (Lib) "Scientists say: ‘We have a theory’ – then that crosses the road to the politicians who say: ‘We know’"

No temperature rise
Thor Pedersen adds that the temperature has not risen in the past decade.

“I’m not saying that in the decade that the temperature has fallen or stagnated is enough to evaluate developments. But one should only say what one knows,” the Speaker adds.

“You should say that although we believed in our models, that the temperature would rise from 1998 to 2008, we have to admit that it has not risen. We cannot explain why it has not risen, but we believe we still have a problem. I’m just asking that people say what they actually know,” Pedersen tells DR.

Pedersen says that a major challenge is how to ensure energy and food to cater for the major population growth the world will be experiencing, and that the COP15 Climate Summit could result in an agreement that reduces the pressure on the Earth.

“We should all shake hands and agree to do everything possible to create good living conditions. That has nothing to do with the climate debate, in which we try to determine the globe’s temperature. It is common sense,” Thor Pedersen says in his interview with DR.

Edited by Julian Isherwood – Politiken.DK

This is a good sign… and Climategate was an unexpected gift, but Obama, who is interested in redistribution of wealth and not what is good for Americans is not only plodding along and stopping off in Copenhagen, but is now changing his Copenhagen visit to correspond with other world leaders (China and India) and at a more crucial time during the gathering and process.

Mind you... Fat Albert (Gore) has now backed out of speaking at Copenhagen. Do you need anymore proof?? But Obama still plans to go there and commit to reducing our carbon emmissions to 2005 levels, which is just about impossible then to commit $10 Billion a year to under developed countries to fight carbon emissions... First of all, do we have that money to spend... oh sorry or leader is into redistribution of wealth at our expense? And secondly, how about using that money for food, water and infrastructure in third world countries instead, if we are going to commit it?? Hello??

We are Days Away from Disaster! - STOP Obama’s Copenhagen GREEN Tax!

Supposed Climate Data that Proves Global Warming Has Been Missing for 20+ Years

Australia’s Parliament defeats global warming bill – At least someone has some guts! Go Aussies!!!

Cap-And-Trade Loss A Stunner in Aussie Vote

United Kingdom Ceased to be a Sovereign State

North Korea’s Currency Has Collapsed

CBS Commentator (Finally): Handling of Climate Change Data Wouldn't Pass Muster at Grade 9 Science Fair

Hopenhagen... Please Sign Petition

Do Not Let Them Get Away With This… Climategate is our Warning– C & T Price Tag: $145 Trillion and Your Way of Life…

Fat Albert Visits the Windy City and Is Confronted On His Lies

The snake Al Gore and his inconvenient lies on display. Note the Mercedes SUV at the end. GM is struggling, the least he could do is buy the new Cadillac or GMC hybrid SUV as an American. Oh wait...never mind...he is a traitor.

Can you believe it?? The UK signed away its sovereignty today to the EU (Obama’s Goal is to sign away our sovereignty as well through the Copenhagen Treaty) and even with all the evidence coming out of Climategate… the lame stream media is still not covering it and Sen Inhofe assigned Gore worshipper … Boxer to investigate Climategate for the Senate… Hello??

The good news… yes there is some is that Australia’s Parliament voted down their version of Cap and Trade, after the liberals thought they had it in the bag.

Obama’s Goal is to sign away our sovereignty as well through the Copenhagen Treaty

Keep praying and pressuring Congress my friends, the tide is turning.

Are You Willing to Pay $145 Trillion for a Program Shrouded in Lies?

Yes, you read that right… Cap and Trade… leading to the Copenhagen Treaty… leading to the full implementation of the United Nation’s Agenda 21 Treaty (already signed and started) would cost $147 Trillion Dollars

And even with the lack of scientific evidence and the release of the emails proving the data rape, lies of parties involved and the destruction of the supposed information that the entire belief (or scam) of man-made global warming is based… our two uber liberal Senators – Boxer and Kerry are still trying to cram a cap and trade bill through the Senate.

The Earth has been cooling for almost 11 years now and the general belief in the scientific community is that the warming before that was not caused by man.

Climategate’s “Harry Read Me” File is a Must Read!

As another pundit said: this isn’t just the smoking gun pointing to the fraud of global warming, it’s a mushroom cloud!

As researchers around the world report on their findings in the hacked emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain you often hear references to the infamous “Harry Read Me” file. The entire file, 247 pages long, is an encyclopedia chronicling the absolute mess that temperature records, upon which much global warming theory is based, are in.

-----------

Lord Christopher Monckton releases the definitive report on ClimateGate

The whistleblower deep in the basement of one of the ugly, modern tower-blocks of the dismal, windswept University of East Anglia could scarcely have timed it better.

In less than three weeks, the world’s governing class – its classe politique – would meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss a treaty to inflict an unelected and tyrannical global government on us, with vast and unprecedented powers to control all once-free world markets and to tax and regulate the world’s wealthier nations for its own enrichment: in short, to bring freedom, democracy, and prosperity to an instant end worldwide, at the stroke of a pen, on the pretext of addressing what is now known to be the non-problem of manmade “global warming.”read more…

by F. Swemson

--------------

‘Botch after botch after botch’
Leaked ‘climategate’ documents show huge flaws in the backbone of climate change science
By LORRIE GOLDSTEIN
Toronto Sun
29th November 2009

…The file — 274 pages long — describes the efforts of a climatologist/programmer at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia to update a huge statistical database (11,000 files) of important climate data between 2006 and 2009.

The computer coding, along with the programmer’s apparently unsuccessful efforts to complete the project, involve data that are the foundation of the study of climate change — recordings from hundreds of weather stations around the world of temperature and precipitation measurements from 1901 to 2006, sun/cloud computer simulations, and the like.
…
The CRU at East Anglia University is considered by many as the world’s leading climate research agency. Here’s how CBSNews.com…’s Declan McCullagh describes its enormous impact on policymakers:

“In global warming circles, the CRU wields outsize influence: It claims the world’s largest temperature data set, and its work and mathematical models were incorporated into the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 report. The report … is what the Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged it ‘relies on most heavily’ when concluding carbon dioxide emissions endanger public health and should be regulated.”

As you read the programmer’s comments below, remember, this is only a fraction of what he says.

- “But what are all those monthly files? DON’T KNOW, UNDOCUMENTED. Wherever I look, there are data files, no info about what they are other than their names. And that’s useless …” (Page 17)

- “It’s botch after botch after botch.” (18)
- “The biggest immediate problem was the loss of an hour’s edits to the program, when the network died … no explanation from anyone, I hope it’s not a return to last year’s troubles … This surely is the worst project I’ve ever attempted. Eeeek.” (31)

- “Oh, GOD, if I could start this project again and actually argue the case for junking the inherited program suite.” (37)

- “… this should all have been rewritten from scratch a year ago!” (45)

- “Am I the first person to attempt to get the CRU databases in working order?!!” (47)

- “As far as I can see, this renders the (weather) station counts totally meaningless.” (57)

- “COBAR AIRPORT AWS (data from an Australian weather station) cannot start in 1962, it didn’t open until 1993!” (71)

- “What the hell is supposed to happen here? Oh yeah — there is no ’supposed,’ I can make it up. So I have : – )” (98)

- “You can’t imagine what this has cost me — to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO (World Meteorological Organization) codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a ‘Master’ database of dubious provenance …” (98)

- “So with a somewhat cynical shrug, I added the nuclear option — to match every WMO possible, and turn the rest into new stations … In other words what CRU usually do. It will allow bad databases to pass unnoticed, and good databases to become bad …” (98-9)

- “OH F— THIS. It’s Sunday evening, I’ve worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done, I’m hitting yet another problem that’s based on the hopeless state of our databases.” (241).

- “This whole project is SUCH A MESS …” (266)

The Devil’s Kitchen calls this “data horribilia” and rightly so. Lorrie Goldstein concludes her piece by saying what many of us have over the years: “And based on stuff like this, politicians are going to blow up our economy and lower our standard of living to “fix” the climate? Are they insane?”

Canadian blogger Small Dead Animals has also been covering the story in detail with a number of excellent resources.

UN Digs In

Meanwhile, over at the United Nations, an organization which stands to rake in billions if the Warmers agenda for global warming is enacted, they are digging in for a fight:

Leaked emails won’t harm UN climate body, says chairman Rajendra Pachaurisays there is ‘virtually no possibility’ of a few scientists biasing IPCC’s advice, after UAE hacking breach
By James Randerson
Guardian.co.uk,
Sunday 29 November 2009

[Mike's note: Would YOU trust this guy?]

There is “virtually no possibility” of a few scientists biasing the advice given to governments by the UN’s top global warming body, its chair said today.

Rajendra Pachauri defended the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the wake of apparent suggestions in emails between climate scientists at the University of East Anglia that they had prevented work they did not agree with from being included in the panel’s fourth assessment report, which was published in 2007.

The emails were made public this month after a hacker illegally obtained them from servers at the university.

Pachauri said the large number of contributors and rigorous peer review mechanism adopted by the IPCC meant that any bias would be rapidly uncovered.

“The processes in the IPCC are so robust, so inclusive, that even if an author or two has a particular bias it is completely unlikely that bias will find its way into the IPCC report,” he said.

What absolute bunk! From the very beginning of the global warming story we’ve seen example after example which confirms how the UN climate panel process has been corrupted. The hacked emails simply confirm what we have known all along. This isn’t about science, it’s about money and power.

What we are likely to find is that the mess at CRU-East Anglia is also replicated at the other big Warmer data factories since their conclusions are all very similar. The only way to be sure is to have an open and transparent investigation of ALL the major data centers doing this work in the United States, Great Britain and elsewhere.

There is absolutely no reason to proceed with any further world plans to address global warming with this kind of doubt, corruption and incompetence on such full display!

Obama Propose Reduction of Carbon Emissions to 2005 levels at Copenhagn – Probably Impossible, will make no difference in global warming or cooling and with be the final nail in the US financial coffin

UK Climate Scientist to Step Down Temporarily – Pending Investigation

In Obama's Own Words... "If Cap and Trade Passes, the Cost of Electricity Will Skyrocket!"

Time to move on…. End the swindle!

Hopenhagen... Please Sign Petition

Obama to Go to Hopenhagen With Emissions Target – Of Course

Obama has been tap dancing with American Public for weeks now, like with his troop decision

from the newly re-awakening NYTIMES, all the news that's fit to print on November 26, 2009 :-)

Obama to Go to Copenhagen With Emissions Target

By JOHN M. BRODER

WASHINGTON — President Obama is pledging a provisional target for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, the first time in more than a decade that an American administration has offered even a tentative promise to reduce production of climate-altering gases, the White House announced Wednesday.

At the international climate meetings in Copenhagen next month, Mr. Obama will tell the delegates that the United States intends to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions “in the range of” 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050, officials said.

The figures reflect targets specified by legislation that passed the House in June but is stalled in the Senate. Congress has never enacted legislation that includes firm emissions limits or ratified an international global warming agreement with binding targets.

Mr. Obama will travel to the United Nations talks to deliver the promise in hopes of spurring significant progress there. He will appear Dec. 9, near the beginning of the 12-day session, on his way to accept the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo on Dec. 10, officials said.

By making the pledge in an international forum, Mr. Obama is laying a bet that Congress will complete action on a climate bill next year and will be prepared to ratify an international agreement based on the commitment.

But White House officials acknowledged that those outcomes were uncertain. They will depend in large measure on whether the Democratic sponsors of the legislation can win 60 votes for a measure that is at the moment unpopular and whether major developing nations, notably China and India, deliver credible emissions reduction pledges of their own.

Mr. Obama has met over the past two weeks with the leaders of China and India, the fastest-growing sources of greenhouse gases, to discuss climate change and the Copenhagen conference.

American officials said that both countries told the president they would be prepared to announce steps to reduce the rate of growth of emissions if the United States put a pledge on the table.

Neither has done so yet, although Chinese officials have hinted that they will announce a near-term target for reducing energy use relative to economic growth, or “carbon intensity,” before the Copenhagen conference opens.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry announced on Thursday that Prime Minister Wen Jiabao would attend the conference.

“Obviously, we hope other major economies will put forth ambitious action plans of their own,” Carol M. Browner, the president’s senior adviser for energy and climate change, said at a White House briefing on Wednesday morning.

Mr. Obama, who had not previously committed either to emissions targets or to going to Copenhagen, has been under considerable pressure from other world leaders and environmental advocates to reassert American leadership on climate change.

Andreas Carlgren, the Swedish environment minister, said that Mr. Obama had now raised expectations for the Copenhagen talks, but he expressed a note of disappointment about the timing of his visit. He said he hoped Mr. Obama would come in the final days of negotiations, when dozens of other heads of government were planning to arrive.

A White House official said a return trip was “highly unlikely.”
It was unclear what effect Mr. Obama’s promise of domestic emissions reductions would have on the slow progress of climate legislation through Congress. Until now, the administration’s negotiators have said they will not get ahead of Congress in making promises in an international forum, but Mr. Obama has now essentially adopted the targets of a climate and energy bill that passed the House in June.

The House bill aims at greenhouse gas reductions of 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and sharper cuts in the following decades, through a cap-and-trade system that includes most of the nation’s major sources of carbon dioxide emissions. Last month, a Senate committee passed a measure calling for a 20 percent cut by 2020, but that is expected to be weakened as the legislation moves through other Senate committees and onto the floor, perhaps next spring.

“By putting a serious number for U.S. emission reductions on the table, the president has just called the world’s bet and then raised it for our negotiating partners,” said Representative Edward J. Markey, co-sponsor of the House legislation.

Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, co-sponsor of the Senate legislation, said he believed that the president’s actions would give a boost to the Copenhagen talks and help move the Senate bill. He called the decision to declare an American target a “game changer,” domestically and internationally.

“By announcing a provisional target, contingent on the support of Congress, the president has defined a path to an international agreement that challenges the developed and developing nations to fulfill their obligations,” he said. “It lays the groundwork for a broad political consensus at Copenhagen that will strip climate obstructionists here at home of their most persistent charge, that the United States shouldn’t act if other countries won’t join with us.”

But Senator James M. Inhofe, the Senate’s most outspoken skeptic on climate change, said that Mr. Obama’s public pledge would do little to speed an international agreement and foolishly prejudged the outcome of a Senate debate that had barely started. Mr. Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma, said that Senate climate legislation was “dying on the vine” and that the Senate would never ratify a treaty that did not require strong emissions reductions from major developing countries.

“The U.S. Senate has made clear on numerous occasions that unilateral action by the United States is unacceptable, because it will harm our economy and have virtually no effect on climate change,” Mr. Inhofe said.

Mr. Obama takes little risk in appearing briefly at the Copenhagen conference because he and other world leaders punctured expectations for the session 10 days ago in a side meeting of leaders of Pacific nations. The leaders agreed that they would work at Copenhagen toward an interim political declaration on climate change that stopped short of a binding international treaty. Delegates are expected to pledge to complete work on a treaty next year.

Mr. Obama came to office promising to end eight years of relative inaction on climate change under the Bush administration, but the inaction of Congress has limited the administration’s ability to negotiate with other nations. At the Kyoto climate conference in 1997, the Clinton administration joined other industrialized nations in pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 5.2 percent by 2012, but Congress refused to ratify the agreement because it made no demands of developing nations.

Many foreign leaders, particularly those in European nations that have been more aggressive in dealing with climate change, have become critical of Mr. Obama’s seeming passivity on the issue. The White House appears to hope that the announcement of the targets and the trip to Copenhagen will quiet some of the dissension and help Mr. Obama re-establish American leadership on what he calls one of the signature issues of the time.

Mr. Obama said recently that he would attend the session if his presence could help lead to a successful outcome. It is significant that he will appear at the beginning rather than at the end of the 12-day meeting. Most major decisions at such environmental talks come in the closing days.

Yvo de Boer, head of the United Nations climate directorate, said in an e-mail message that he would like to see the American target in writing and a pledge of money to help poorer nations adapt to a changing climate.

“If the president comes in the first week to announce that,” Mr. de Boer said, “it would be a major boost to the conference.”
The White House also announced that several cabinet secretaries would speak at the Copenhagen conference: Lisa P. Jackson, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator; Steven Chu, the secretary of energy; and Ken Salazar, the secretary of interior.
James Kanter contributed reporting from Brussels.

Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’? - Not if your Progressive Agenda 21 (video) Supporting Leaders Can Help It!! See: Progressives In Congress

Mind you, Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry are frantically trying to sneak a Cap and Trade Bill through the Senate for Obama to take to Copenhagen to Sign the Copenhagen Treaty to cede US Sovereignty to the UN and to step up the progression of Agenda 21 and meeting their Dec 31, 2009 deadline goal. Much of its provisions have already started or are in place just waiting for Cap and Trade and the Copenhagen Treaty to be signed my Obama.

Related:

The Global Warming Stood Still

AGENDA 21 Videos and Why Are Americans IGNORANT of ‘ AGENDA 21’

More On Codex

Slavery or Freedom – A Choice We Have To Make!

Ever wonder why they don’t hear us?? Checkout: http://www.commieblaster.com/progressives/index.html#Anchor-14210

Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?

If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip:Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

Here are a few tasters. (So far, we can only refer to them as alleged emails because – though Hadley CRU’s director Phil Jones has confirmed the break-in to Ian Wishart at the Briefing Room – he has yet to fess up to any specific contents.) But if genuine, they suggest dubious practices such as:

Manipulation of evidence:

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

Suppression of evidence:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.

Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.

Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:

Next
time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat
the crap out of him. Very tempted.

Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):

……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….

And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.

“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”

“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”

Hadley CRU has form in this regard. In September – I wrote the story up here as “How the global warming industry is based on a massive lie” – Hadley CRU’s researchers were exposed as having “cherry-picked” data in order to support their untrue claim that global temperatures had risen higher at the end of the 20th century than at any time in the last millenium. Hadley CRU was also the organisation which – in contravention of all acceptable behaviour in the international scientific community – spent years withholding data from researchers it deemed unhelpful to its cause. This matters because Hadley CRU, established in 1990 by the Met Office, is a government-funded body which is supposed to be a model of rectitude. Its HadCrut record is one of the four official sources of global temperature data used by the IPCC.

I asked in my title whether this will be the final nail in the coffin of Anthropenic Global Warming. This was wishful thinking, of course. In the run up to Copenhagen, we will see more and more hysterical (and grotesquely exaggerated) stories such as this in the Mainstream Media. And we will see ever-more-virulent campaigns conducted by eco-fascist activists, such as this risible new advertising campaign by Plane Stupid showing CGI polar bears falling from the sky and exploding because kind of, like, man, that’s sort of what happens whenever you take another trip on an aeroplane.

The world is currently cooling; electorates are increasingly reluctant to support eco-policies leading to more oppressive regulation, higher taxes and higher utility bills; the tide is turning against Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. The so-called “sceptical” view is now also the majority view.

Unfortunately, we’ve a long, long way to go before the public mood (and scientific truth) is reflected by our policy makers. There are too many vested interests in AGW, with far too much to lose either in terms of reputation or money, for this to end without a bitter fight.

But if the Hadley CRU scandal is true,it’s a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility which is never likely to recover.

By: James Delingpole is a Brittish writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome to Obamaland: I've Seen Your Future And It Doesn't Work, How To Be Right, and the Coward series of WWII adventure novels. His website is www.jamesdelingpole.com

Related:

The Day Global Warming Stood Still

We Have Until December... 2009

Agenda 21

A Solution and a Choice: Slavery or Freedom

The Day Global Warming Stood Still

Climate Change: As scientists confirm the earth has not warmed at all in the past decade, others wonder how this could be and what it means for Copenhagen. Maybe Al Gore can Photoshop something before December.

It will be a very cold winter of discontent for the warm-mongers. The climate show-and-tell in Copenhagen next month will be nothing more than a meaningless carbon-emitting jaunt, unable to decide just whom to blame or how to divvy up the profitable spoils of climate change hysteria.

The collapse of the talks coupled with the decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to put off the Kerry-Boxer cap-and-trade bill, the Senate's version of Waxman-Markey, until the spring thaw has led Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the leading Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee, to declare victory over Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and the triumph of observable fact over junk science.

"I proudly declare 2009 as the 'Year of the Skeptic,' the year in which scientists who question the so-called global warming consensus are being heard," Inhofe said to Boxer in a Senate speech. "Until this year, any scientist, reporter or politician who dared raise even the slightest suspicion about the science behind global warming was dismissed and repeatedly mocked."

Inhofe added: "Today I have been vindicated."

The Ada (Oklahoma) Evening News quotes Inhofe: "So when Barbara Boxer, John Kerry and all the left get up there and say, 'Yes. We're going to pass a global warming bill,' I will be able to stand up and say, 'No, it's over. Get a life. You lost. I won,'" Inhofe said.

Now we have the German publication Der Spiegel, which is rapidly becoming the house organ for climate hysteria, weighing in again with the sad news that the earth does not have a fever so we really don't have to throw out the baby with the rising bath water.

In an article titled, "Climatologists Baffled By Global Warming Time-Out," author Gerald Traufetter leads off with the observation: "Climatologists are baffled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years." They better figure it out, Der Spiegel warns, because "billions of euros are at stake in the negotiations."

We are told in sad tones that "not much is happening with global warming at the moment" and that "it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year." But how can it be that the earth isn't following all those computer models? Is the earth goddess Gaia herself a climate change "denier"?

The article gloomily notes that a few weeks ago Britain's Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research pointed out that the earth had in fact only warmed 0.07 degree Celsius from 1999 to 2008 and not by the 0.2 degree Celsius predicted by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

An even more inconvenient truth, according to the British experts, is that when their figures are adjusted for two naturally occurring climate phenomena, El Nino and La Nina, the resulting temperature trend is reduced to 0.0 degree Celsius. No, that's not a typo.

As if that weren't enough, it seems hackers broke into the computer network run by the Hadley Climate Research Unit, removing 61 megabytes of e-mails and data.

While we don't condone theft, the hacked data and e-mails have spilled onto the Web and reveal something startling: The scientists at Hadley, one of the world's leading climate change study centers, aren't scientifically objective at all.

Indeed, in e-mails, they boast of twisting scientific data to suit their views and to "hide" the truth. At one point, a scientist actually gloats over the death of global warming skeptic John L. Daly, saying, "In an odd way, this is cheering news."

If true, this is massive scientific fraud.

To add to the warm-mongers' woes, patron saint Al Gore, the man who claimed to have invented the Internet, might also have claimed the discovery of Photoshop. Dr. Roy Spencer, of the University of Alabama at Huntsville, formerly with NASA, has taken a look at the pictures used to illustrate Gore's new book, "Our Choice: A Plan To Solve the Climate Crisis."

Gore Photoshopped NASA imagery of the earth for the fold-out cover photo, adding four hurricanes at once, including one spinning in the wrong direction next to Florida and, in a physical impossibility, one on the equator next to Peru. Somewhere in the process, the island of Cuba was deleted.

It is the warm-mongers who are spinning in the wrong direction. We win. You lose. Get a life.

Source: Investors Business Daily

Gore prominently quotes Deuteronomy, "I’m offering you the choice of life or death."

The cover of Nobel Laureate Al Gore's new book "Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis" was intentionally doctored to exaggerate the appearance of hurricanes in the northern hemisphere as well as reduce the amount of ice present in the Arctic.

Maybe even more ominously, Florida was so diminished it's almost totally gone.

The cover opens and closes half and half — so you only see one hurricane…as in the press release photo or the one on Amazon.

But this is the real picture sequence from the book which I looked at Borders today and took cell-phone pictures, original (before the retouching by some “artist”) Note all of the Arctic ice and the size of the Florida Peninsula…

And the final product:

A midget Southern Hemisphere cyclone is off the coast of Florida, another hurricane is sitting on the equator off the coast of Peru — and the Arctic Ice is gone (perhaps it is summer) and the Florida Peninsula is half gone

Don't let your guard down just yet. There are hundreds of trillions of dollars at stake, and the true driving force behind this travesty - i.e., the let's redistribute the wealth socialists like George Soros - will not give up easily. They simply are going to make it a two-step process instead of one. What will get signed at the meeting simply paves the way for the final step later.

Here are my opinions:

"Follow the money trail..."

And there are several trails to follow.

1. Environmental activists - need to raise funds to survive, but if there isn’t a cause, there’s no funding and they would all have to go out and get real jobs that they are qualified for, like flipping burgers. The Holly Grail of causes is the totally fictitious false mantra of “Global Warming”, and it arose from the shambles of their previous attempt to spread voodoo-science Chicken Little scare tactics back in the early 70’s when they falsely claimed that our industrial emissions were contributing to a looming, global ecological catastrophe known as “Global Cooling” and that if drastic, costly measures weren’t implemented immediately, glaciers would over run Canada and the northern US by end of the (last) century. (One plan even called for dumping vast quantities of black soot on the arctic ice caps to cause the glacial ice to melt.) But the Earth didn’t cooperate, as it was busy on one of its natural cycles of slight warming (these warm-cool cycles have been going on for hundreds of millions of years prior to the arrival of the first SUV). So “Global Cooling” became Global Warming”. Yet that gosh darn stubborn ‘ol Earth still refuses to cooperate by not conforming itself to any of the voodoo-science predictive computer models and in fact it has continued along its merry way in a natural cycle of cooling for well over a decade. So the envrionuts change the disaster label to “Climate Change”, which is a good one because no one can disprove that the climate doesn’t change, as it does so by the minute. Now the envirowhackos are rolling in cash and never have to fear doing and honest day’s work in their lives. MONEY!

2. Governmental Infiltration by Environuts – who stated out doing some noble work, but soon the left took over entire agencies (just like they did the Universities, the AARP, etc.) and suddenly grant money became available to “study” the causes and impacts of Global Warming – NOT to study whether or not there was such a phenomenon as Global Warming, but instead only to substantiate its existence. They stated with the base assumption that Global Warming was a reality and then set out to prove it so, which is a complete perversion of the scientific method. Grant money was available to produce results that supported the Global Warming concept, but not to do anything that might disprove it. Many of my colleagues in the Earth sciences at that time became seduced by the lure of the grants and sold their scientific souls to join the charade. MONEY!

3. The big breakthrough for the fraudulent movement came when large corporations that really knew the Global Warming nutjobs were a disgrace to the real scientific community caved in anyway and suddenly started worshiping in the Church of Bogus Facts because they saw they could make money by doing so. “My product is greener than my competition’s products” has become one of the largest marketing ploys in modern time, as it crosses the entire spectrum of food, vehicle, appliances, household cleaning products, etc., etc. This is also when carpetbagging, snake-oil salesman, shyster and failed politician Al Gore jumped in to secure his fame, glory and future wealth by becoming the keynote huckster and posterboy of the fraud. MONEY!

4. The convenient truth for a global movement that has been festering since the 1930’s to create a utopian society in which the masses had the exact same standard of living whether they contributed to it or not and the few, powerful elite enjoyed the finer things in life that the masses provided them in exchange for baubles and trinkets (i.e., socialists, Marxists, communists, etc. failed ideologies), that fell into their laps was the Global Warming conspiracy. It became evident early on that some parts of the world, which happened to consist of nations with high standards of living because their populations were smart and industrious, contributed more emissions than other countries that lacked those inherent creative talents and missed the self–created prosperity of he industrial-train as it roared past them, didn’t contribute to emissions. So, using the false science of Global Warming, the utopians of the left initiated a campaign to make the prosperous nations feel guilty about being the sole cause of the eventual destruction of the Earth, and that all those poor nations that were innocent needed to be compensated by the bad guys for committing the crime of being prosperous and frying the Earth as a result. We now have the UN spearheading that cause, and the richest nations (we know who leads that list, don’t we boys and girls) will all have to redistribute their wealth accordingly – i.e., the standard of living of the prosperous people declines while that of the nations that failed to make themselves prosperous increases. Why, it’s only fair, right? MONEY!

I do not confess to recalling the exact data from the ICCP reports, but they projected that if nothing is done the Earth’s average temperature will rise seven degrees in 50 or 100 years (I forget which), which IS a big deal. But they further stated that if you added up the total CO2 emissions from ALL sources (cars, trucks, trains, planes, factories, power plants, etc., etc.) that that amount reportedly causes the Earth’s temperature to rise one degree in 50 or 100 years (I forget which). So think about it: Even if we stopped EVERYTHING (no more cars, trucks, trains, planes, factories, power plants, etc., etc. ever again), we’d only managed to knock one degree off that total of seven – i.e., we don’t even make a dent by stopping all energy consuming and emission generating activities (i.e., we all just freeze in the dark).

So, IF the ICCP reports are factual (and they are not because they have the fundamental flaw that CO2 in the atmosphere leads to increasing Earth temperature), then, by their own math, the ICCP reports show that there already is nothing we can do to avert disaster. Perhaps instead of spending billions of dollars trying in vain and also sending 2% of our annual GDP to third-world nations as the UN Climate Control Treaty would mandate that we do, how about building a bunch of biga*s dikes and barriers along all coasts to keep the seawater out?

"Global Warming" is the most outrageous hoax ever played on a global society!

The Great Man-Made Global Warming Swindle

Arctic Sea Ice Video (Jan 2000 - May 2009)

WAR ON HUMAN LIFE: A WARNING - New Video

But Do Not Think That Because We Have Figured Out That Global Warning Is A Farce... That They Will Stop - Remember, Agenda 21 Has Already Been Signed (Under Bush 41) and Put In Place Under Both His and Clinton's Administrations... Hmmm... Clinton-Gore???? Agenda 21 is real and must be revoked!!

Related:

Federally Created Dust Bowl in CA - Another Test Crisis?

Hopenhagen... Please Sign Petition

PICTORIAL HISTORY OF OUR FUTURE DEMISE-FROM BEGINNING TO END (SCHEDULED FOR DEC 31, 2009)

Links you need to explore: Club of Rome & Codex Alimentarious/Earth Charter/UNESCO…

Agenda 21 - Video

AGENDA 21 - DEPOPULATION 2009 PART 1 Continue – Video

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty? - Video

AGENDA 21 Videos – And Why Are American Still Ignorant of Agenda 21?

Obama's Copenhagen World Green TAX!

Obama's Copenhagen World Green TAX!

We are ONE MONTH AWAY FROM DISASTER!!

Right now, we must SEIZE THE MOMENT!

December's Climate Treaty is nearly here, and even though those who respect and honor the free enterprise system in the United States have made tremendous strides and even some victories, even still . . .

THE STAGE IS SET IN COPENHAGEN FOR THE . . . . . WORLD CLIMATE ORDER!!

This is where I need your help IMMEDIATELY! - YOU CAN HALT THE OBAMA "GREEN EXPRESS" IN COPENHAGEN!

FAX Obama And All 100 Senators - STOP Obama's CLIMATE TREATY! https://secure.conservativedonations.com/cdfe_greentreaty/?a=3252

Or do it yourself: Senators from your State. contact info and Call the White House at 202-456-1414 or 1111 and tell President Obama you have had enough!

Through your fax blasts and your giving, the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise (CDFE) can greatly assist the disruption of such a disastrous decision! If Obama, Al Gore, and their cronies have their way, we will be ratifying this "greenhouse debacle" within days.

STOP THE COPENHAGEN GREEN WORLD ORDER!
We have prepared special faxes (see below) to be sent to President Obama and every Member of Congress. Let's put the brakes on this very bad blow to our American free enterprise system. Will you assist the CDFE today?

All the G20 nations know perfectly well that "adaptation" to global warming would destroy their economies! It is my hope that someone, anyone who is a key insider adviser to President Obama, will let him know!

The last United Nations negotiating session before next month's Copenhagen summit on climate change has ended in Spain, yet there is no agreement yet. There is still a change for good to win over evil.

Unfortunately, most Americans are uninformed about this climate change issue. You see, that is one of the main reasons why we exist---to use research and education to PROPERLY INFORM Americans on these free enterprise matters.

Unfortunately, this treaty is a matter of life and death to us as a sovereign nation. In 1776 the United States was formed as a completely sovereign nation.

We must do everything within our power to keep that sovereignty!!

This takeover of our sovereignty amounts to real TREASON!!
The Copenhagen Climate Treaty has two basic objectives:

1. Prescribe energy use and consumption to the "haves"!!
2. Shift wealth from the "haves" to the "have nots"!!

The accomplishment of these two objectives amounts to outright socialism at best—and global totalitarianism at worst. Both are NOT a win-win!!

Obama stands ready to sign the treaty!

That's why our Senators must hear from us right away!

YOU CAN HALT THE OBAMA "GREEN EXPRESS" IN COPENHAGEN!

Copenhagen can lead to a significant political agreement, but if it happens it will be a major disaster for the developed world, with the United States the biggest loser, since it would bankrupt the nation to bribe poor countries into surrendering their own development.

Insiders at the negotiating session in Spain said the missing ingredient - even more than the absence of agreement on targets, money and technology - was trust.

But treaty organizers are determined to have it pass. And with the help of our U. S. Senators and President Obama, it will! Swedish Finance Minister Anders Borg said at the close of the Spain session, "There will be a deal in Copenhagen, that's quite clear. We won't solve the problem in Copenhagen, but there will be progress."

It is up to you and I to STOP THAT PROGRESS!
Part of the Copenhagen Climate Treaty unbelievably reads: "Industrialized countries have a dual obligation under the Treaty, representing their overall responsibility for keeping the world within limits of the global carbon budget and ensuring that adaption to the impacts of climate change is possible for the most vulnerable.

THIS DUAL BINDING OBLIGATION TAKES THE FORM OF EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS AS WELL AS THE PROVISION OF SUPPORT TO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES."

Yes, that means we are giving away a part (a big part) of our great country's sovereignty!

If all elements of the Treaty (which hardly anyone knows a lot about!!) were to be voted in place, this December, it would establish a GLOBAL GOVERNMENT for the first time in history!!
This tyranny must come to a screeching HALT!

It is time for YOU to choose: tyranny or freedom?

YOU CAN HALT THE OBAMA "GREEN EXPRESS" IN COPENHAGEN!

FAX Obama And All 100 Senators - STOP Obama's CLIMATE TREATY! https://secure.conservativedonations.com/cdfe_greentreaty/?a=3252

Or do it yourself: Senators from your State. contact info and Call the White House at 202-456-1414 or 1111 and tell President Obama you have had enough!

Here is precisely how this Copenhagen Climate Treaty will adversely affect you:

1. Double digit inflation as a result of all goods and materials becoming much more expensive
2. Raise the deficit through increased borrowing by our Treasury
3. Transfer economic growth and profits from the United States to lesser-prepared countries
4. Delay the recovery of the United States, which will affect EVERY SEGMENT of our society
5. Increased U. S. manufacturing job loss through new cap and trade laws
6. Be even more in debt to communist China
7. Increase your state and federal taxes
8. Regulation of personal spending on energy by law and high prices
9. Move away from the U.S. Dollar to a One-World currency
10. Increased costs per gallon of gas

THE LIST GOES ON AND ON!
And yet, too few Americans have ever researched this subject at all! Or, they've seen Al Gore interviewed on some television program; and believe all the "doom and gloom" that he professes.
You thought that Obama's "Healthcare Reform" was the most important issue. Lord knows, we've lived through all the debates these past few months---and months to come! YET…..

If we do not stand firm against Obama and the U. S. Senate ratifying this Copenhagen Treaty, YOU may be enslaved to a new Green World Order! (Obama and the other G20 Members have already declared a New Economic World Order… How is that working out for you so far?)

This will not wait until someone else is president. This will not even wait until the elections of 2010. We are facing devastation next month!
YOU CAN HALT THE OBAMA "GREEN EXPRESS" IN COPENHAGEN!
FAX Obama And All 100 Senators - STOP Obama's CLIMATE TREATY! https://secure.conservativedonations.com/cdfe_greentreaty/?a=3252

Or do it yourself: Senators from your State. contact info and Call the White House at 202-456-1414 or 1111 and tell President Obama you have had enough!

Let your voice, fax and check book be heard!

NO MORE SOVEREIGNTY SUICIDE!!

Even though President Obama pledged his allegiance to uphold the Constitution at his inauguration, his actions have not meshed with what can happen, literally, next month!

The U. S. Constitution dictates that treaty ratification must have approval votes by a TWO-THIRDS majority in the U. S. Senate.
Please join us in this SOVEREIGNTY SUICIDE STRUGGLE!

Act now! Don't delay.

We will be looking for your urgent fax to the President and every U. S. Senator.

The nation you save will be your own.
Sincerely,

Ron Arnold
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise
www.cdfe.org

P. S. I cannot underscore how important this issue really is. Do not let our President or our Senators SELL US OUT under the mis-guidance of helping other under-developed countries. Sure, we have compassion for others less fortunate, but NOT at the expense of losing our sovereignty.

YOU CAN HALT THE OBAMA "GREEN EXPRESS" IN COPENHAGEN!
FAX Obama And All 100 Senators - STOP Obama's CLIMATE TREATY! https://secure.conservativedonations.com/cdfe_greentreaty/?a=3252

Or do it yourself: Senators from your State. contact info and Call the White House at 202-456-1414 or 1111 and tell President Obama you have had enough!

Or SEND your donation to:
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise
Dept Code - 3252
12500 NE 10th Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

Related:

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?

We Have Until December…

Agenda 21

Smithsonian Exhibit ‘Now’ Outdated: “Global Cooling… Now a Myth” – Now Selling Out to Global Warming Pressure

The Great Man-Made Global Warming Swindle

We Were Fools to Think the Fall of the Berlin Wall had Killed off the Far Left!

The Boxer-Kerry green boondoggle

Preview: Not Evil Just Wrong… Get Your Copy of the Full Movie Here

This mindset also led to the belief that a sense of nationhood was the cause of all the ills in the world, precisely because western nations embodied western values. So transnational institutions or doctrines such as the EU, UN, international law or human rights law came to trump national laws and values (which is where we find ourselves now if we allow Cap and Trade to pass and Obama to sign the Copenhagen treaty or if Senator Boxer and Secy Hillary Clinton have their way and push us into the UN’s - Rights of the Child treaty taking away parental rights and giving it to the UN.)

Editorial: The UN Housing Police… Sent to the US… Hello? Wake-Up… It is Starting!!

How Did Your Congressman Vote On Cap and Tax... uh Trade???? - They have already passed a Cap and Trade Bill

When election time comes remember the people who are not representing you and vote them out (starting with Sen Boxer, Sen Kerry and the WH)! Who is pushing Cap and Trade? Who is voting to give away rights and sovereignty??