US Army Report on Millenialism

A U.S. Army Major From the School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Levenworth, Kansas, has published a Monograph titled, “Strategic Implications of American Millenialism” ( 2008). The report, written by Major Brian L. Stuckert, US Army, is 78 pages.

If you are a student of the Bible or participate in any religion, Christian, or otherwise, and believe the book of Revelation, this report is about you. After page 40 or so, many well known Christians and Christian organizations are named as inhibitors to what a Godless government would like to achieve, sans anyone who believes in millenialism.

Check out the document on this link: Strategic Implications of American Millennialism
Here are a few excerpts:

Top of page 1:

“Military leaders, planners and strategists require greater understanding of American millennial thought. Millennialism shapes both American culture and U.S. government policy. While most Americans are influenced to some degree by the ideas of pre-millennialism, many are unaware of the philosophical or theological underpinnings. Military leaders charged with interpreting policy into strategy and acting on behalf of the nation on the international stage cannot afford to remain ignorant of the effects of pre-millennialism. Due to a general lack of awareness of millennialism and an uneasy reticence to discuss religious factors, understanding and analysis of our own policies and motives is often deficient. Additionally, the cultural imprint that derives from millennialism impairs our understanding of the words, actions and motives of other actors on the world stage. These factors can be problematic for any military leader or planner attempting to achieve U.S. Government policy objectives through strategy, operations and programs.”

Top of page 57:

“Millennialism is an important consideration when evaluating or implementing U.S. policy with respect to Israel or in the broader Middle East. Tenets of pre-millennialism are at odds with the U.S. official government position with respect to the Roadmap Peace Plan. (my emphasis) It is unlikely that either a presidential administration of either party or the Congress will ever take substantive action to force implementation of the Roadmap. Since the U.S. is a guarantor of the Roadmap, this millennial reality may undermine U.S. credibility in foreign policy over the long-term and lead to continued conflict throughout the Middle East. Additionally, the confusing and inconsistent nature of U.S. actions will likely erode relations with the E.U., Russia and Arab nations.”

Bottom of page 58-59:

“Pre-millennial interpretations of biblical prophecy that predict the emergence of a one-world government led by an anti-Christ causes distrust and even antagonism toward organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the European Union, NAFTA and OPEC. Reflecting on her time as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Madeleine Albright notes that many of her efforts were frustrated because the U.N. was widely perceived as playing the “villain’s role” as the architect of world government by many American Christians.
Albright goes on to explain that she constantly found herself “on the defensive” and, as a functionary within the U.N., was perceived by many as “quite literally – the devil’s advocate.” The Christian right constantly works to undermine the U.N. One particularly noteworthy example was a videotape produced by Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Forum titled Global Governance: The Quiet War Against American Independence, which prominently featured future Attorney General John Ashcroft denouncing the U.N.”

H/T to Diana Peyton a AAM