The President has put Executive Orders (EO's), Directives, and legislation in place that will affect our freedom. I'm providing all links so that you can look at this research to understand why we all need to be very concerned, spread the word, and take action against what he is doing by contacting your Congress Members (you can use the attached letter; just add your name and contact info at the bottom of it and fax or mail it to as many Congressman as you can).
Congressman Rogers (R-MI) is trying to revoke Obama's EO’s with HR 4453. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-4453
To understand how URGENT this is, when I learned about HR 4453, I faxed a letter to Congressman Rogers' office to let him know of the other legislation Obama is putting in place which gives him DICTATOR POWER, and within about 10 minutes I GOT A CALL FROM HIS OFFICE.
I had a lengthy chat with the Congressional Assistant that called me, and he was so appreciative that I sent the information about Obama's other legislation so that they can take action on it. He revealed that despite Obama's loss of a majority in the Senate, the Obama agenda hasn't changed; he will use other ways, like EO's, to fulfill his agenda.
I assure you that after you look at this research of the legislative framework being enacted by Obama, you will realize that freedom as we know it is about it come to an end. This IS Obama's ultimate agenda.
To understand the importance of HR 4453, Congressman Jones (R-NC), one of the co-sponsors of HR 4453, wrote this article: http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-c-2010-01-15-241697.112112...
(Disarming a population is the first step in overtaking that population).
To see the 6 other courageous Congress Members co-sponsoring HR 4453 thus far, go to: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4453
We must urge Congress Members to co-sponsor H.R. 4453, sponsored by Congressman Michael Rogers (R-MI), to revoke EO 13524 and restore verbiage to EO 12425.
Two days after the President was sworn in, he began putting other dangerous legislative mechanisms in place; hence, it is critical to revoke EO 13524 as a first step. Please review this, and you will understand the framework that is being put into place.
DoD Directive 1404.10: “DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce” dated Jan 23, 2009 which builds and authorizes a civilian 'Force' to operate within the DoD. The 1992 directive mentions the term “overseas” no fewer than 33 times. The 2009 directive does not mention the term “overseas” even once.” http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140410p.pdf
Soros-supported RAND Corp Report: “A Stability Police Force for the United States” 2009 (heavily redacted) which describes the feasibility, methods and cost associated with creating the ‘Force’ to circumvent the Posse Comitatus Act http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9432/
H.R. 675: “TO AMEND TITLE 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms.” introduced Jan 26, 2009 (in committee) to expand the DoD ‘Force’.http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-675
H.R. 645: "National Emergency Centers Establishment Act" introduced Jan 22, 2009 (in committee) which creates facilities to house people under the direct control of DHS (not FEMA) http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645
EO 12425 on Dec 16, 2009, whereby an international police ‘Force’ is authorized to act within the U.S. that is no longer subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure (expanding the ‘Force’ and disarming Americans).http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending...
President Obama, during the campaign - which no one, and I mean NO ONE asked him to explain.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s
DHS' 2009 report defines who the 'terrorists' are http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf
[DHS basically deems patriotic Americans as terrorists]
RAND Corp Report - A Stability Police Force for the U.S. [text excerpt: “CONCLUSIONS”]
Conclusions
"Weighing all considerations, the researchers concluded that the best option would be a 6,000-person hybrid force headquartered in the U.S. Marshals Service. The personnel in reserve status could be employed in state and local police forces so they would be able to exercise police functions in a civilian population daily and could be called up as needed. The Marshals Service was deemed to have many of the requisite skills. However, its training and management capabilities would need to be expanded to take on this large mission, and it would have to recruit additional personnel as well. The annual cost, $637 million, is reasonable given the capability it buys. The cost savings in relieving military forces of these duties could be greater than required to create the SPF.
The Military Police option was attractive for a number of reasons, especially its capacity, training, and logistical capabilities, but its inability to engage in policing activities when not deployed was a major stumbling block. The Posse Comitatus Act precludes military personnel from exercising police functions in a civilian setting, and legislative relief might be difficult to get. Even if such relief were forthcoming, it is unclear where and how routine police skills might be honed.
Creation of a civilian SPF would not affect the roles that other elements of the U.S. government would play. Rather, it would complement other agencies such as the departments of Defense and State. But the SPF would provide a necessary capability, and the U.S. Army should support its creation."
----------
For the text of EO 13524 giving the International Police Force Privileges, Exemptions and Immunities on US soil:http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-30413.pdf
For an analysis of EO 12425, go to: http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=630
To understand how Obama's Executive Orders and PDD-51 (put in place by Bush) give him DICTATOR POWER:http://www.prisonplanet.com/pdd-51-new-executive-order-give-obama-d...
HR 4453 is currently in committee (House Foreign Affairs), so these are the committee members we need to pressure most in order to ensure they move the bill forward: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/committee.xpd?id=HSFA
Thank you so much!
Nancy Jacques
Related:
Of Executive Orders and Trojan Horses – Updated
-U.S. Forces Plan Direct Action Against American Citizens
Nancy's Sample Letter:
Dear Honorable Congress Member,
I urge you to please co-sponsor H.R. 4453, sponsored by Congressman Michael Rogers (R-MI), to revoke Executive Order 13524.
It is urgent that I let you know that Two days after the President was sworn in, he began putting other dangerous legislative mechanisms in place; hence, it is critical to revoke EO 13524 as a first step. Please review this, and you will understand the framework that is being put into place.
DoD Directive 1404.10: “DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce” dated Jan 23, 2009 which builds and authorizes a civilian 'Force' to operate within the DoD. The 1992 directive mentions the term “overseas” no fewer than 33 times. The 2009 directive does not mention the term “overseas” even once.” http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140410p.pdf
Soros-supported RAND Corp Report: “A Stability Police Force for the United States” 2009 (heavily redacted) which describes the feasibility, methods and cost associated with creating the ‘Force’ to circumvent the Posse Comitatus Act http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9432/
H.R. 675: “TO AMEND TITLE 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms.” introduced Jan 26, 2009 (in committee) to expand the DoD ‘Force’.http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-675
H.R. 645: "National Emergency Centers Establishment Act" introduced Jan 22, 2009 (in committee) which creates facilities to house people under the direct control of DHS (not FEMA) http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645
EO 12425 on Dec 16, 2009, whereby an international police ‘Force’ is authorized to act within the U.S. that is no longer subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure (expanding the ‘Force’). http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending...
President Obama, during the campaign - which no one, and I mean NO ONE asked him to explain.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s
DHS' 2009 report defines who the 'terrorists' are http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf [DHS basically deems patriotic Americans as terrorists]
RAND Corp Report - A Stability Police Force for the U.S. [text excerpt: “CONCLUSIONS”]
Conclusions
"Weighing all considerations, the researchers concluded that the best option would be a 6,000-person hybrid force headquartered in the U.S. Marshals Service. The personnel in reserve status could be employed in state and local police forces so they would be able to exercise police functions in a civilian population daily and could be called up as needed. The Marshals Service was deemed to have many of the requisite skills. However, its training and management capabilities would need to be expanded to take on this large mission, and it would have to recruit additional personnel as well. The annual cost, $637 million, is reasonable given the capability it buys. The cost savings in relieving military forces of these duties could be greater than required to create the SPF.
The Military Police option was attractive for a number of reasons, especially its capacity, training, and logistical capabilities, but its inability to engage in policing activities when not deployed was a major stumbling block. The Posse Comitatus Act precludes military personnel from exercising police functions in a civilian setting, and legislative relief might be difficult to get. Even if such relief were forthcoming, it is unclear where and how routine police skills might be honed.
Creation of a civilian SPF would not affect the roles that other elements of the U.S. government would play. Rather, it would complement other agencies such as the departments of Defense and State. But the SPF would provide a necessary capability, and the U.S. Army should support its creation."
I am so hopeful that you will co-sponsor H.R. 4453, and that you will reverse/revoke the dangerous legislative instruments that this administration is putting in place. I'll await your response to this URGENT matter.
Thank you so much,
[YOUR NAME]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR CONTACT INFO]
No comments:
Post a Comment