GBTV - Where the Truth Lives

Election Season 2014

And it has brought us to this trainwreck called ObamaCare and we have bankrupted our kids and grandkids!

We are now headed into the 2014 Election Season and common sense and conservatism are on the rise. Please stand-up and be counted!

Reading Collusion: How the Media Stole the 2012 Election is a great place to start!

The Founding Father's Real Reason for the Second Amendment

And remember the words of Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." See Video of Suzanna Gratia-Hupp’s Congressional Testimony: What the Second Amendment is REALLY For, below (u-tube HERE).

The Leaders Are Here... Palin, Cruz, Lee, Paul, Chaffetz....

T'S A WONDERFUL LIFE

Can You Really Still Believe That None of These People Would Have Done a Better Job???

Bloggers' Rights at EFF

SIGN THE PETITION TODAY...

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Are You Wondering … What Should I Be Doing… During These Uncertain Times? Part I

As Americans are becoming more and more aware that we are going in the wrong direction, they are experiencing feelings of uncertainty, fear, and anger while developing a hunger for knowledge and guidance of what to do next. The books below are a good place to start…

The most common questions people are asking:

What should I be doing to help?

What books should I be reading?

What should I be doing to be prepared for the worst… just in case?

We will be addressing all those issues over the next few days.  But to start with, below is a list of books that you (everyone) should start with and we will be posting an expanded list.

Not knowing history is one of the greatest mistakes we, as Americans, have made.  If you don’t know history… it will repeat itself!

Revelations from three books, linked as a 'trilogy'… written by friends

(Thinking Our of the Box)

The Age of the Unthinkable: Why the New World Disorder Constantly Surprises Us And What We Can Do About It

(How to Survive)

The Survivors Club: The Secrets and Science that Could Save Your Life

(God and link to America)

America's Prophet: Moses and the American Story

Plus…


(A Great and Accurate Overview of American History not being taught in our schools)

A Patriot's History of the United States: From Columbus's Great Discovery to the War on Terror

And to Understand What your children, grandchildren and the younger generation are thinking and why… or if you are under 30:

New Book: Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation

And Some Other Must Reads:

The 5000 Year Leap

Arguing with Idiots

Glenn Beck's Common Sense

Liberal Fascism

Liberty and Tyranny

Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History

The Constitution (only 20 pages) and the Bible (or your spiritual book)

Related:

83% of American Adults Could Not Pass the Basic History Test… What Will Happen With Our Kids?

“An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens.” …Thomas Jefferson

(However, public schools are the greatest way to control the next generation if used in the wrong way… See: The Dumbing Down of America Series)

Then add to your list:

Rules for Radicals

Culture of Corruption

Intellectuals and Society

…to begin understanding the playbook of the Obama Administration and the Progressive Movement, which is being used by the party now in power, who follow the theories and blueprints of  Saul Alinsky and Cloward & Piven, leaders of the American Progressive Movement… which includes creating over-whelming chaos to wear the opposition down and accusing the opposition of exactly what they themselves are doing and then spinning with the help of the media, which  is exactly what is happening now in our Country.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

President Obama Heading to California to Campaign for Barbara Boxer

Three Republicans that are fighting to get into the "ring" with Boxer are closing in and Boxer now finds herself facing her toughest re-election “bout” yet.

Considering the rise of incumbent unpopularity and the fact that Senator Barbara Boxer –– the three-term Democratic senator –– is confronting her own unfavorable rating, which has recently shot up to 51 percent; Boxer is now facing what is expected to be her toughest re-election “bout” yet. However, President Obama has decided to step in as “promoter in chief” and will be making a trip to California next month to help raise money for Boxer and the Democratic National Committee: a fundraiser event that is set to take place in Los Angeles.

Boxer, a staunch progressive, needs a jolt to her campaign because Republican hopefuls are closing in. The latest Rasmussen poll puts Boxer in a virtual dead heat with Tom Campbell in California’s U.S. Senate race and Carly Fiorina and Chuck DeVore remain within striking distance.

The three Republican candidates, who are in a match of their own fighting to get into the "ring" with Boxer, are aggressively stepping up their strategies and snatching strong “ringside” support. Carly Fiorina, the wealthy former Chief Executive of Hewlett-Packard, just last week secured a very high profile endorsement by former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice. Tom Campbell, on the other hand, is a former member of Congress, who seems to fit the moderate Republican profile, has the backing of Conservative GOP politician Bill Simon. Meanwhile, Chuck DeVore, a Republican Assemblyman, has just snaggedthe support of the Tea Party Express, which will be announced today (Saturday - March 27, 2010) at a mega rally –– located in Senator Harry Reid's hometown of Searchlight, Nevada and headlined by former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.


So far it looks like Fiorina has a slight lead over Campbell, while DeVore trails behind. The Republican California primary coming up in June will be fascinating to watch and its outcome will decide who will get into the much anticipated political bout with Boxer. And with such an important midterm election coming up in November, that looming question arises: will Boxer get “knocked out” of the California senate seat, marking a predominately liberal state into the “red?"

With "dope" now on the 2010 California November ballot, which has the possibility of turning California "brown," coupled with an unpredictable political climate, it is safe to assume anything can happen!

Author: Christine Lakatos — Published: Mar 27, 2010 at 5:02 pm

NEWS in Politics: BlogCritics

You can hear the first Devore vs Fiorina vs Tom Campbell Debate here in Full

Chuck Devore was the clear winner, but judge for yourself.  But either way, Boxer is on her way out if we (California Conservatives) stay focused and get out the word and the vote!!

Related:

Heard a panel talking about the fact the Meg Whitman has the same philosophy as Barack Obama on Amnesty and Immigration.  That is a major problem for California and for her candidacy!!

Also, Please Visit:  Please visit:   RepealBoxer.com  &  FirePelosi.com

Seems Stupak Planned to Betray Pro-Lifers Over A Year Ago – Now Group Getting $3.4B in Earmarks

Video:  Stupak Speaking in Cheboygan, MI – Very Telling

Pro-Life Democrats Who Switched Vote for Health Bill Request Billions in Earmarks

FOXNews.com

The 11 House Democrats led by Rep. Bart Stupak who dropped their opposition to health care reform mere hours before the final vote have requested $3.4 billion in earmarks -- and one watchdog group wants to know whether the money represents business as usual, or a political payoff.

Rep. Bart Stupak announces he will vote to pass the health care reform bill at the U.S. Capitol in Washington March 21. (AP Photo)

The 11 House Democrats led by Rep. Bart Stupak who dropped their opposition to health care reform legislation mere hours before the final vote have requested $3.4 billion in earmarks -- and one watchdog group wants to know whether the money represents business as usual or political payoffs.

The Sunlight Foundation says it plans to track the earmark requests, which were put in one day after health care reform cleared Congress, to see whether they're approved and whether it appears lawmakers are being rewarded for their vote.

"We know that in Congress one of the ways that leadership tries to influence members is through earmarks," said Bill Allison, editorial director at the nonpartisan organization. "So this seemed to us something good to follow."

Stupak and the 10 other Democrats were critical to the success of the health care bill. They were holding out over concerns about funding for abortion coverage but announced the president had assuaged their worries -- with an executive order restricting abortion funding -- the morning of the big vote.

Stupak's office said there's absolutely no link between the earmarks and the health care bill's passage.

"The congressman's vote for health care has no connection to annual appropriations requests," spokeswoman Michelle Benoche said. "Appropriations requests were submitted on Monday, March 22, because that is the deadline of the Appropriations Committee."

She also said his earmark requests this year are in line with prior years, in number and in total amount.

But watchdogs want to know whether there's more to the story.

Since the health care reform push hit its final stretch, numerous sweeteners for lawmakers' districts and states have been found inside the package. Earmark requests are made outside of the health care bill, making them a bit more difficult to link to any vote-trading. But it is precisely that kind of tricky-to-catch deal-making that Republican Sen. Tom Coburn said he and other GOP senators would be monitoring for months to come.

"If you think you can cut a deal now and it not come out until after the election, I want to tell you that isn't going to happen," Coburn said a few days before the bill passed.

Lawmakers like Stupak have since been heavily scrutinized. Allison said the lawmakers who stood with him will find out if those earmarks are approved when the Appropriations Committee's bills come out in June or July.

The individual earmarks requests from each of those lawmakers range from $20 million to $1.4 billion. Of the eight lawmakers whose 2010 requests were available for comparison, five requested more money than they did a year ago. Stupak requested $579 million.

Here are the earmark amounts requested by the 11 House Democrats in the 2011 bill:

Rep. Jerry Costello of Illinois.: $1,418.7 million ($256.4 million in 2010)

Rep. Solomon Ortiz of Texas: $618 million ($726.1 million in 2010)

Stupak of Michigan: $578.9 million

Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio: $294 million ($305.7 million in 2010)

Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper of Pennsylvania: $236.8 million ($54 million in 2010)

Rep. James Oberstar of Minnesota.: $207 million ($226 million in 2010)

Rep. Brad Ellsworth of Indiana.: $115.4 million ($82.3 million in 2010)

Rep. Charles Wilson of Ohio: $84 million ($62.3 million in 2010)

Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania.: $67.1 million

Rep. Steve Driehaus of Ohio: $33.2 million

Rep. Joseph Donnelly of Indiana: $19.8 million ($11.65 million in 2010)

The Sunlight Foundation also says it is going to look at Republican earmarks. House Republicans say they are not requesting any earmarks for the next fiscal year, but Allison said the Sunlight Foundation will watch GOP senators to see if they appear to be putting in earmark requests for their House colleagues.

Fox News' Molly Henneberg contributed to this report.

Vote the Bums out in November… or start a recall or impeachment movement now!!  And fight to overturn ObamaCare!!

Related:

Excellent ObamaCare Article by Mark Steyn

Obama’s Medicare pick urges ‘radical transfer of power’

A Must Read Letter from Austrian Born American, Kitty Wirthmann

A must listen to/read – Please take the Time to Hear Kitty Wirthmann…

Video (Audio):  Alex Jones talking with Kitty Wirthmann – Austrian Born American who was a child under Hitler

And if you haven’t read her article: America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don’t Let Freedom Slip Away please take the time to now~

This article may be long, but it is worth it because if we won't learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it.  Praise God for those who are willing to teach us from their experiences.  This is a story by Kitty Werthmann, a woman from Austria who believes America is truly the greatest country in the world, and does not want us to lose our freedoms the way other people lost theirs.

The full 63-minute story is available on CD for $15 or $12 with purchase of another item at Realityzone.com


What I am about to tell you is something you’ve probably never heard or will ever read in history books.

I believe that I am an eyewitness to history. I cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history. We elected him by a landslide – 98% of the vote. I’ve never read that in any American publications. Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force.  In 1938, Austria was in deep Depression. Nearly one-third of our workforce was unemployed. We had 25% inflation and 25% bank loan interest rates.

Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily. Young people were going from house to house begging for food. Not that they didn’t want to work; there simply weren’t any jobs. My mother was a Christian woman and believed in helping people in need. Every day we cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry people – about 30 daily.

The Communist Party and the National Socialist Party were fighting each other. Blocks and blocks of cities like Vienna, Linz, and Graz were destroyed. The people became desperate and petitioned the government to let them decide what kind of government they wanted.

We looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany, where Hitler had been in power since 1933. We had been told that they didn’t have unemployment or crime, and they had a high standard of living. Nothing was ever said about persecution of any group -- Jewish or otherwise. We were led to believe that everyone was happy. We wanted the same way of life in Austria . We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of unemployment and help for the family. Hitler also said that businesses would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back. Ninety-eight percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have Hitler for our ruler.

We were overjoyed, and for three days we danced in the streets and had candlelight parades. The new government opened up big field kitchens and everyone was fed.

After the election, German officials were appointed, and like a miracle, we suddenly had law and order. Three or four weeks later, everyone was employed. The government made sure that a lot of work was created through the Public Work Service.

Hitler decided we should have equal rights for women. Before this, it was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home. An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldn’t support his family. Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for marriage.

Hitler Targets Education – Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children:

Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang “Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,” and had physical education.

Sunday became National Youth Day with compulsory attendance. Parents were not pleased about the sudden change in curriculum. They were told that if they did not send us, they would receive a stiff letter of warning the first time. The second time they would be fined the equivalent of $300, and the third time they would be subject to jail. The first two hours consisted of political indoctrination. The rest of the day we had sports. As time went along, we loved it. Oh, we had so much fun and got our sports equipment free. We would go home and gleefully tell our parents about the wonderful time we had.

My mother was very unhappy. When the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldn’t do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful. There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun – no sports, and no political indoctrination. I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing. Their loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler. It seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn’t exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.

Equal Rights Hits Home:

In 1939, the war started and a food bank was established. All food was rationed and could only be purchased using food stamps. At the same time, a full-employment law was passed which meant if you didn’t work, you didn’t get a ration card, and if you didn’t have a card, you starved to death. Women who stayed home to raise their families didn’t have any marketable skills and often had to take jobs more suited for men.

Soon after this, the draft was implemented. It was compulsory for young people, male and female, to give one year to the labor corps. During the day, the girls worked on the farms, and at night they returned to their barracks for military training just like the boys. They were trained to be anti-aircraft gunners and participated in the signal corps. After the labor corps, they were not discharged but were used in the front lines. When I go back to Austria to visit my family and friends, most of these women are emotional cripples because they just were not equipped to handle the horrors of combat. Three months before I turned 18, I was severely injured in an air raid attack. I nearly had a leg amputated, so I was spared having to go into the labor corps and into military service.

Hitler Restructured the Family Through Daycare:

When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers. You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole generation of children. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology. By this time, no one talked about equal rights. We knew we had been had.
Health Care and Small Business Suffer Under Government Controls:

Before Hitler, we had very good medical care. Many American doctors trained at the University of Vienna . After Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government. The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full. If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn. There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries.

As for healthcare, our tax rates went up to 80% of our income. Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household. We had big programs for families. All day care and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing.

We had another agency designed to monitor business. My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables. Government officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar. He couldn’t meet all the demands. Soon, he went out of business. If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control.

We had consumer protection. We were told how to shop and what to buy. Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it.

“Mercy Killing” Redefined:

In 1944, I was a student teacher in a small village in the Alps . The villagers were surrounded by mountain passes which, in the winter, were closed off with snow, causing people to be isolated. So people intermarried and offspring were sometimes retarded. When I arrived, I was told there were 15 mentally retarded adults, but they were all useful and did good manual work. I knew one, named Vincent, very well. He was a janitor of the school. One day I looked out the window and saw Vincent and others getting into a van. I asked my superior where they were going. She said to an institution where the State Health Department would teach them a trade, and to read and write. The families were required to sign papers with a little clause that they could not visit for 6 months. They were told visits would interfere with the program and might cause homesickness.

As time passed, letters started to dribble back saying these people died a natural, merciful death. The villagers were not fooled. We suspected what was happening. Those people left in excellent physical health and all died within 6 months. We called this euthanasia.

The Final Steps - Gun Laws:

Next came gun registration. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily.
No more freedom of speech. Anyone who said something against the government was taken away. We knew many people who were arrested, not only Jews, but also priests and ministers who spoke up.

Totalitarianism didn’t come quickly, it took 5 years from 1938 until 1943, to realize full dictatorship in Austria . Had it happened overnight, my countrymen would have fought to the last breath. Instead, we had creeping gradualism. Now, our only weapons were broom handles. The whole idea sounds almost unbelievable that the state, little by little eroded our freedom.

After World War II, Russian troops occupied Austria. Women were raped, preteen to elderly. The press never wrote about this either. When the Soviets left in 1955, they took everything that they could, dismantling whole factories in the process. They sawed down whole orchards of fruit, and what they couldn’t destroy, they burned. We called it The Burned Earth. Most of the population barricaded themselves in their houses. Women hid in their cellars for 6 weeks as the troops mobilized. Those who couldn’t, paid the price. There is a monument in Vienna today, dedicated to those women who were massacred by the Russians. This is an eye witness account.

It’s true….those of us who sailed past the Statue of Liberty came to a country of unbelievable freedom and opportunity.  America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World.  Don’t Let Freedom Slip Away.

After America, There is No Place to Run.

Hitler and Obama’s Health-Enabling Acts

“There are too many similarities to keep ignoring the obvious…!”

Big Brother Becomes Big Bully

And if you are still not sure that this is a possibility…

Watch this special: The Revolutionary Holocust: Live Free or Die

Full Documentary:  Full Documentary of 20th Century Dictators – History We Cannot Forget and Connections We Need to Make

Only by understanding History can we stop it from repeating…

“An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens.” …Thomas Jefferson

(However, public schools are the greatest way to control the next generation if used in the wrong way… See: The Dumbing Down of America Series)

The opposite of Marxism, Socialism, and Communism is not Fascism (they, as well as Progressivism, are all on the same left side of the scale)… It is Anarchy. Capitalism, Democracy and Freedom are in the Middle. Our Founding Father’s gave us a Republic and armed us with the Bill of Rights and the Constitution to keep it.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” --Ronald Reagan

If any of this strikes a chord… interests you… scares you… or just makes you wonder please do some research and pass it on…

Sunday, March 28, 2010

New Tea Party Protocol, Nullification and Judge Andrew Napolitano

NEW PROTOCOL FOR TEA PARTY EVENTS - PLEASE READ AND PASS ALONG
  For anyone not aware… The Dems spent a good part of last week creating unsubstantiated incidents in an attempt to make the tea partiers and conservatives look bad after healthcare was passed, and in minds of many create an illusory sentiment of fear of violence, giving the Feds a reason to declare a National State of Emergency and/or help them with arguments to take more second amendment rights from Americans.  This photos shows the brazen attitude that the Democratic members of Congress had as they walked through the crowd of tea partiers, almost daring them to some sort of confrontation.  When non came other than waving signs and chanting, the left decided to create an incident (that nobody conveniently heard, saw or took photos of) and then they followed it up with a week of the same.

Great idea! Just posted on Resistnet. Pass it along to everyone you know far and wide:






This was posted earlier today on Resistnet and I wanted to share it with you...  

In order to combat the tactics of the liberals, tea party activist need to do something so radical and so simple that the opposition cannot combat against it. Starting today; all tea party activist need to follow simple protocols when they are interacting with democratic, liberal or progressive members who engage with the public.

Like last Sunday, House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi and other key democrats tried (unsuccessfully) to instigate a reaction when they marched into a crowd of demonstrators. What tea party members and other patriots need to do is voice loudly your concerns until they opposing members are in sight.

Then they need to become very silent, no out cries, no outbursts of any type. Dead quiet. As the opposition moves toward the crowd, the crowd gives total right away to them. Do not block them from getting to their goal, no matter what it is.

Then as they pass by an individual member and everyone behind that person; they turn their back, in silent, on them. Therefore as they move through this very silent crowd, people are turning their back in shame on them and they keep their back turned until they reach their destination. The crowd should remain silent for 90 seconds after they leave the area.

If you do this, the opposition cannot react to this walk of shame. They cannot claim someone did something. Because the crowd was silent and as they walked among them, the crowd had their back behind them.

Do these protocols for all functions this will completely take them by surprise and there they will not be able to mount any offense to combat this practice.



Blacks and Jews have traditionally voted Democratic and now they are courting the Hispanic vote, even though these groups values tend to be me much closer to Republicans or Conservatives!  So why do they do it.  The Democrats are excellent at spinning the truth convincing there and other minorities (as a group) that they support them, when in reality the Dems fight for their votes and then hold them down or sell the out. 

This week’s series of incidents between Obama and Netanyahu are a perfect example.  63% of blacks poll in-line with Christian values and the Dems have done a great job of changing history so that most Americans forget that Abraham Lincoln was a Republican, Martin Luther King was a Republican, and the social legislation passed in 1964 had been introduced by Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower or his appointees in 1954 and 1957, but  took 10-years to get it passed.

Democrats and Progressives are looking at Amnesty not to help Hispanics or to deal with the problem of securing our borders our of safety and security concerns.  They are concerned with passing Amnesty to use the Hispanic vote to get re-elected in a climate where all their political careers are on the line and then will continue to hold Hispanics down instead of furthering a true immigration and assimilation process to help any new immigrants.







Judge Napolitano at 912 Project in Ft Worth 


President Barack Obama is one of the worst presidents ever in terms of respecting constitutional limitations on government, and the states suing the federal government over healthcare reform "have a pretty strong case" and are likely to prevail, according to Fox News judicial analyst Judge Andrew P. Napolitano.  Read the Full Story -- Go Here Now

We better hope that Judge Napolitano is right!!


The Process of Nullification – What is it???

Far from being a discredited political doctrine, nullification is, in actuality, a constitutionally consistent principle whereby sovereign states can defend their reserved rights and powers from federal acts of usurpation, most of which are motivated by partisan politics and power scheming. It is in every way consistent with the Constitution's fundamental principles, most notably the concepts of delegated powers and the separation of powers. Indeed, it should be recognized that it is not so much a state that nullifies a federal law or act, as it is the Constitution that does so, in that the Constitution limits what the federal government may rightfully do. Viewed in that light, nullification is really nothing more than a state saying to the federal government, "The Constitution does not authorize you to do this, therefore, we are not obligated to submit to you in this matter, and are choosing not to do so."

The REAL ID Act of 2005 is plainly and simply unconstitutional, and therefore an act of usurpation. The Constitution does not grant the federal government power to dictate state driver licensing requirements, nor does it allow Washington to force Americans to carry 'papers'. If the State of Montana decides to nullify this so-called 'law', it will have every right to do so. I would even go so far as to argue that it would have the duty to do so, given that Montana's elected officials are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, of which the REAL ID Act is a naked violation.

Consequently, to Hal Harper and others who may have their doubts, I would say, stand up for yourselves with pride and assert your rights. Far too often these days, the federal government forgets that it is a servant tasked with certain limited duties, not an omnipotent master; and it is high time that it was put in its place -- while such is still possible. Benjamin Franklin once said, "We have given you a Republic, if you can keep it." Simply put, nullification is all about "keeping it".

Join the Patriotic Resistance... Here are a few places to start:








Scary Quote from 1944

Socialist Party Candidate:  1944
clip_image001

Nakita Khrushchev, Communist and Premier of the USSR, said very the same when he spoke at the United Nations… taking off his shoe to pound on the platform, he said:  “We will bury you without ever firing a shot!”

Video (Hannity): Obama Is A Socialist


In one week… last week, Obama and the Progressives in our government have taken over 1/6 of our economy, the student loan industry, and the healthcare industry; have insulted our best ally in the Middle East and have entered into a new questionable arms deal with Russia, reducing our strength at a time when Iran is telling us, Israel, and the world that they are going nuclear (while working with Russia) as the particulars are leaking out (for those who didn’t read it) about what all is in the HC plan, its actual cost and what is planned next (Amnesty; attack on the second amendment; attack on conservative radio, tv and Internet free speech; and revamping of the Cap and Trade legislation… but nothing substantial for jobs), should not leave much doubt for anyone that this man, Norman Mattoon Thomas, was right.

Judge Napolitano at 912 Project in Ft Worth

Judge Napolitano: Supreme Court Will Strike Down Obamacare

President Barack Obama is one of the worst presidents ever in terms of respecting constitutional limitations on government, and the states suing the federal government over healthcare reform "have a pretty strong case" and are likely to prevail, according to Fox News judicial analyst Judge Andrew P. Napolitano.  Read the Full Story -- Go Here Now

We better hope that Judge Napolitano is right!!

Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History

Nullification – What is it???

Far from being a discredited political doctrine, nullification is, in actuality, a constitutionally consistent principle whereby sovereign states can defend their reserved rights and powers from federal acts of usurpation, most of which are motivated by partisan politics and power scheming. It is in every way consistent with the Constitution's fundamental principles, most notably the concepts of delegated powers and the separation of powers. Indeed, it should be recognized that it is not so much a state that nullifies a federal law or act, as it is the Constitution that does so, in that the Constitution limits what the federal government may rightfully do. Viewed in that light, nullification is really nothing more than a state saying to the federal government, "The Constitution does not authorize you to do this, therefore, we are not obligated to submit to you in this matter, and are choosing not to do so."


The REAL ID Act of 2005 is plainly and simply unconstitutional, and therefore an act of usurpation. The Constitution does not grant the federal government power to dictate state driver licensing requirements, nor does it allow Washington to force Americans to carry 'papers'. If the State of Montana decides to nullify this so-called 'law', it will have every right to do so. I would even go so far as to argue that it would have the duty to do so, given that Montana's elected officials are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States, of which the REAL ID Act is a naked violation.

Consequently, to Hal Harper and others who may have their doubts, I would say, stand up for yourselves with pride and assert your rights. Far too often these days, the federal government forgets that it is a servant tasked with certain limited duties, not an omnipotent master; and it is high time that it was put in its place -- while such is still possible. Benjamin Franklin once said, "We have given you a Republic, if you can keep it." Simply put, nullification is all about "keeping it".

Jefferson – Nullification – Render Void Acts Contrary to the Constitution

Saturday, March 27, 2010

BO's Civilian Army in HC Bill

Remember Obama's statement "I want a private, civilian force as well armed and funded as the military"?? Keep asking yourself... WHY DOES HE NEED SUCH A THING, WHEN WE HAVE THE MOST POWERFUL MILITARY ON EARTH"???

He got the funding & it's in the HC Bill....FOUND IT!!!

Read this VERY carefully. # 4 is interesting...the Surgeon General is in charge, even in non health emergencies?

This is a copy of the Senate bill that was approved Sunday night. Pg 1312 is the forces.

SEC. 430. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS. 

Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time
of national emergency.

(2) REQUIREMENT.—All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended.

(3) APPOINTMENT.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(4) ACTIVE DUTY.—Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training.

(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.—Warrant officers may be appointed to the Service for the purpose of providing support to the health and delivery systems maintained by the Service and any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be considered for purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code, to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corps of the Service.

(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULAR CORPS.—Effective on the date of enactment of the Affordable Health Choices Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the
Regular Corps.

(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY
RESERVE.—

In HC Bill:

(1) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel
available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve
program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions.

(2) USES.—The Ready Reserve Corps shall—

(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;

(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;

(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and (D) be available for service assignment in
isolated, hardship, and medically underserved communities (as defined in section 399SS) to improve access to health services.

(d) FUNDING.—For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to the Office of the Surgeon General for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014. Funds appropriated under this subsection shall be used for recruitment and training of Commissioned Corps Officers.

Now I ask you.......what in the world is THIS doing in the HC BILL & WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH INSURING AMERICANS?!?!?!?!

ObamaCare Prescription:  ‘Emergency health army’

The Vat Cometh

WASHINGTON -- As the night follows the day, the VAT cometh.

With the passage of Obamacare, creating a vast new middle-class entitlement, a national sales tax of the kind near-universal in Europe is inevitable.

We are now $8 trillion in debt. The Congressional Budget Office projects that another $12 trillion will be added over the next decade. Obamacare, when stripped of its budgetary gimmicks -- the unfunded $200 billion-plus doctor fix, the double counting of Medicare cuts, the 10-6 sleight-of-hand (counting 10 years of revenue and only 6 years of outflows) -- is at minimum a $2 trillion new entitlement.

It will vastly increase the debt. But even if it were revenue-neutral, Obamacare pre-empts and appropriates for itself the best and easiest means of reducing the existing deficit. Obamacare's $500 billion of cuts in Medicare and $600 billion in tax hikes are no longer available for deficit reduction. They are siphoned off for the new entitlement of insuring the uninsured.

This is fiscally disastrous because, as President Obama himself explained last year in unveiling his grand transformational policies, our unsustainable fiscal path requires control of entitlement spending, the most ruinous of which is out-of-control health care costs.

Obamacare was sold on the premise that, as Nancy Pelosi put it, "health care reform is entitlement reform. Our budget cannot take this upward spiral of cost." But the bill enacted on Tuesday accelerates the spiral: It radically expands Medicaid (adding 15 million new recipients/dependents) and shamelessly raids Medicare by spending on a new entitlement the $500 billion in cuts and the yield from the Medicare tax hikes.

Obama knows that the debt bomb is looming, that Moody's is warning that the Treasury's AAA rating is in jeopardy, that we are headed for a run on the dollar and/or hyperinflation if nothing is done.

Hence his deficit reduction commission. It will report (surprise!) after the November elections.

What will it recommend? What can it recommend? Sure, Social Security can be trimmed by raising the retirement age, introducing means testing and changing the indexing formula from wage growth to price inflation.

But this won't be nearly enough. As Obama has repeatedly insisted, the real money is in health care costs -- which are now locked in place by the new Obamacare mandates.

That's where the value-added tax comes in. For the politician, it has the virtue of expediency: People are used to sales taxes, and this one produces a river of revenue. Every 1 percent of VAT would yield up to $1 trillion a decade (depending on what you exclude -- if you exempt food, for example, the yield would be more like $900 billion).

It's the ultimate cash cow. Obama will need it. By introducing universal health care, he has pulled off the largest expansion of the welfare state in four decades. And the most expensive. Which is why all of the European Union has the VAT. Huge VATs. Germany: 19 percent. France and Italy: 20 percent. Most of Scandinavia: 25 percent.

American liberals have long complained that ours is the only advanced industrial country without universal health care. Well, now we shall have it. And as we approach European levels of entitlements, we will need European levels of taxation.

Obama set out to be a consequential president, on the order of Ronald Reagan. With the VAT, Obama's triumph will be complete. He will have succeeded in reversing Reaganism. Liberals have long complained that Reagan's strategy was to starve the (governmental) beast in order to shrink it: First, cut taxes -- then ultimately you have to reduce government spending.

Obama's strategy is exactly the opposite: Expand the beast, and then feed it. Spend first -- which then forces taxation. Now that, with the institution of universal health care, we are becoming the full entitlement state, the beast will have to be fed.

And the VAT is the only trough in creation large enough.

As a substitute for the income tax, the VAT would be a splendid idea. Taxing consumption makes infinitely more sense than taxing work. But to feed the liberal social-democratic project, the VAT must be added on top of the income tax.

Ultimately, even that won't be enough. As the population ages and health care becomes increasingly expensive, the only way to avoid fiscal ruin (as Britain, for example, has discovered) is health care rationing.

It will take a while to break the American populace to that idea. In the meantime, get ready for the VAT. Or start fighting it.

Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com ColumnistBy Charles Krauthammer - a 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner, 1984 National Magazine Award winner, and a columnist for The Washington Post since 1985.

Friday, March 26, 2010

83% of American Adults Could Not Pass the Basic History Test… What Will Happen to Our Kids?

U.S. History For Dummies

A recent national survey commissioned by The American Revolution Center revealed an alarming lack of knowledge of our nation's founding history. An astonishing83 percent of American adults failed the test.
Among results that reveal the depth of ignorance among our fellow citizens:

You can download a copy of the survey report here. And remember to teach your children and grandchildren American history. Government-run schools obviously do not.

SOURCE: RESIST TYRANNY

Related:

The Dumbing Down of America Series – A must read and watch series if you haven’t seen it!!

New Book: Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation

A Patriot's History of the United St...

The 5000 Year Leap

Arguing with Idiots

Glenn Beck's Common Sense

Voting in America: Who is Voting… And What Is the Plan??

SO DO YOU KNOW WHO NOW VOTES IN YOUR COUNTRY? ALMOST ANYBODY WHO CAN GET IN. HOW'S THAT WORKING FOR YOU?

Video: Newt Gingrich – Impeach Judges…

March 26, 2010 Engineering the New Electorate By Jon N. Hall - http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/engineering_the_new_electorate.html

Voting is so central to the American system that three of the last five amendments to our Constitution deal with it (Amendments 23, 24 and 26). Amendment 26, for instance, extends the vote to eighteen-year-olds.

But the American political Left (a.k.a. progressives) wants to extend the vote well beyond American teenage citizens. In the hope of creating instant Democrat voters, Al Gore's Citizenship USA program rammed through grants of citizenship by waiving qualifications. At WorldNetDaily in 2001, Kenneth R. Timmerman reported:

Citizenship USA was an initiative of Vice President Al Gore that was ostensibly part of his National Performance Review to "reinvent" government. Internal White House memos, obtained by the House Judiciary Committee in 1997, showed that the vice president was well aware that the effort could be perceived as a "pro-Democrat voter mill."

On March 28, 1996, White House aide Doug Farbrother e-mailed Gore detailing his efforts to get INS to waive fingerprinting and background checks "to make me confident they could produce a million new citizens before Election Day."

Gore then wrote Clinton: "You asked us to expedite the naturalization of nearly a million legal aliens who have applied to become citizens." The risk, Gore warned, was that "we might be publicly criticized for running a pro-Democrat voter mill and even risk having Congress stop us."

But why bother with granting aliens citizenship? In the Republic of California, San Franciscans want illegal aliens to have the vote. (Somewhere down the line, expect to see the argument that if they can vote for office, shouldn't illegals be allowed to run for office, too?) In "The Threat of Non-Citizen Voting," Hans A. von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation notes:

Florida is not unique. Thousands of non-citizens are registered to vote in some states, and tens if not hundreds of thousands in total may be present on the voter rolls nationwide. These numbers are significant: Local elections are often decided by only a handful of votes, and even national elections have likely been within the margin of the number of non-citizens illegally registered to vote.
Yet there is no reliable method to determine the number of non-citizens registered or actually voting because most laws to ensure that only citizens vote are ignored, are inadequate, or are systematically undermined by government officials. Those who ignore the implications of non-citizen registration and voting either are willfully blind to the problem or may actually favor this form of illegal voting.

On January 5, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (the most reversed circuit in the nation) ruled: "Incarcerated felons should be allowed to vote in Washington to ensure that racial minorities are protected under the Voting Rights Act." The plaintiff was one Muhammad Shabazz Farrakhan.

On July 1, 2008 in The Nation, left-wing commentator Katrina vanden Heuvel expressed her sympathies:

In the twenty-first century, the other America is behind bars, literally and figuratively: with one of every 100 Americans in prison, we are establishing a perverse parallel America--a predominantly nonwhite one--and making it permanent by stripping those consigned there of the right to vote. It's a hopeful sign that a growing number of states are re-enfranchising ex-felons. Vermont, Maine and Puerto Rico never deny citizens the right to vote and even allow prisoners to vote from jail, while sixteen other states as well as the District of Columbia allow citizens to vote who are on probation or parole or who have been released from prison. Recognizing the right of ex-felons to vote would grant them the power to contest this status for others and help reintegrate them into society.

Ms. Vanden Heuvel never explained the necessity of allowing psychopaths, rapists, murderers, domestic terrorists, and their like to take part in democracy. Do they have special insights on, say, the public option that the law-abiding don't?

Rachel La Corte of the AP reports that an estimated 5.3 million felons nationwide are ineligible to vote. This cohort is a potential treasure trove of support for Democrats, as John Lott demonstrates that felons overwhelmingly vote Democrat. (What can we conclude about Democrat politicians from this fact?) From the Timmerman link above: "[M]ore than 80,000 aliens had fingerprint checks that generated criminal records, but they were naturalized anyway."
The Left sold your birthright for a mess of votes and never batted an eye. Everything the Left has done vis-à-vis elections has been to expand the electorate; they couldn't care less about the integrity of our elections. In Ohio, a judge has ruled that a park bench can be used to fulfill the residency requirement for voter registration. The Left's latest assault on electoral integrity is universal voter registration, which would trample all over states' rights and create voter registration chaos.

The "new electorate" consists of convicted felons, illegal aliens, and citizens who should never have been naturalized, but were. The "new electorate" also consists of citizens who commit election fraud. What does this mean for democracy in America?
(If the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vexes you, watch this video.)

Jon N. Hall is a programmer/analyst from Kansas City.

Related:

How Obama and Pelosi Are Planning to Steal the Elections!

The Student Loan Industry Takeover

The Student Loan Industry Takeover…

Although the ultimate attack on the youth of America will be much greater than what probably occurs to most students, initially after some thought, they will realize that the taking over of the Student Loan Industry (Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009) has nothing to do with lowering their costs or helping them financially.

The takeover and inclusion thereof in the ObamaCare Bill initially seems like an odd pairing. But the reasoning behind and plan for this double economic and power dip has always been part of the ObamaCare plan so that the interest on the student loans, which will be higher than it has previously been under private administration, will be used to feed the behemoth government healthcare takeover, as well as other Obama initiatives.

It is estimated that the average student will be paying approximately $1,800 to $2,000 more in interest for their loans than they would have under the old system. Add this to the requirement of ObamaCare that everyone carry expensive health insurance after these students leave their parent's policies at age 26 or pay fines to the federal government will leave these students strapped as they begin their careers and possibly marriages and families.

At that point they will probably be offered the exchange of some loan forgiveness for service in Obama Youth programs of some type pushing social justice and other Progressive ideas and edicts.

As time passes it is expected that loans and rates (and who receives them) could very well be tied to the families' and students' political affiliations, religion, school choices and choices of majors. Increased federal control of courses and class curriculum will certainly be in our and our children's futures if this change is not repealed.

There is nothing positive in the government's takeover of student loans for anyone but the government.

Please call your Senators and Congressman and urge a repeal of this process and takeover; regardless of what is happening with the ObamaCare challenges.

Should this legislation stand, it could leave a bitter taste in the mouth of many students... who are not yet a product of the coming Progressive indoctrination programs. We can only hope that it opens their eyes before the next election and into the future.

Ask Marion~

(If you stop to think about the amount of money now available to the Obama administration with four years of funds for healthcare coming in while no HC is being delivered and the interest on student loans, the possibilities for misuse are staggering. It certainly points to another reason they were so focused on forcing this legislation on the American people.)

How Obama and Pelosi Are Planning to Steal the Elections!

New Book: Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generationclip_image003

Newest News Nuggets (03.26.10)

clip_image001

Dems Creating False Storyline to Distract From What They've Done? 

Watch: Baucus Says Obamacare Helps Redistribute the Wealth

U.N.'s Endorsement of Obamacare Will Backfire

Spectacularly Dissent Is Noble Until Aimed at Democrats 

Castro Praises Obamacare 

Doctor:  I’ll Quit When (So-Called) Reform Kicks In 

Companies Already Stating They Can't Afford Obamacare 

Today’s Hidden Tidbit in ObamaCare: (Found Thanks to As A Mom member)

HEALTHCARE BILL ESTABLISHES OBAMA'S ARMY

Since the Health Care Reform Bill is supposed to be about health care...improving it....and the people are supposed to love it so, maybe someone can explain to me:

1. Why it authorizes the formation of an army and

2. What that has to do with health care that anyone wants?

This is a copy of the Senate bill that was approved Sunday night. Pg 1312 is the forces (LINE 13).

http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-ca... 

IT LOOKS LIKE B.O. JUST GOT HIS OWN PRIVATE ARMY

clip_image002

Obama Leaves Israeli Prime Minister Alone To Go Eat 

Union Pensions Looking For A Taxpayer Bailout  - Hello???

New Book: Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generationclip_image003

At the center of the theories of Saul Alinsky and Cloward & Piven, leaders of the American Progressive Movement, is creating over-whelming chaos to wear the opposition down

This is exactly what is happening now in our Country.  These Nugget Links are designed to help you at see what is our there and wade through…

Please take a few moments daily to peruse what is not being covered by much of the mainstream media~

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation

Tonight on Hannity (9pm ET)  and yesterday on the Ed Morrissey Show (3 pm ET), we welcome back Jason Mattera of Young America’s Foundation, this time to talk about his new book, Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation, which is already at #111 on Amazon’s chart. Afterward, Jim Geraghty of Campaign Spot returns to talk through the politics of ObamaCare and the perpetual campaign!



Now you can join the conversation in the chat room! Be sure to register at Ustream to participate in our raucous live-chat sessions. (And if the log-in prompt doesn’t come up in the chat box below, use this link instead.) Jazz Shaw of The Moderate Voice and The Monster moderate the chat, and they have Troll Gun Trivia Contest running before the show, for those who get there early — and are registered!